Samsung, the Benelux arm of the South Korean electronics company, was reportedly slapped with a hefty fine of $46.9 million or €40 million. Based on the reports, the penalty was imposed by the Authority for Consumers and Markets for price fixing in the Netherlands.
The Dutch competition regulator revealed about the fine on Wednesday, Sept. 29. It was learned that the price fixing issue is related to the prices of televisions in the said country.
According to Reuters, the Netherlands’ ACM said that for years, Samsung hiked up the prices of the TVs it sells in the country by urging local retailers to raise their prices. The Korean firm was said to have been persuading them to increase the price tags if they were selling televisions below Samsung’s preferred market price.
The ACM said that this action weakened the competition between seven of Netherland’s major online electronics stores. The regulator added that Samsung also told the retailers involved that their rivals will also observe its pricing policy, so this probably is one reason why they were convinced.
Moreover, the electronics company was also reported to have contacted the retailers if their rivals complained about the low prices of the televisions. This information was recorded on a document that was obtained by the ACM. “Samsung’s advice was not individual and not without consequences,” the Swiss regulator stated.
At any rate, Samsung Electronics Benelux denied the allegation that it pushed the retailers to use its preferred price. It said that it is disappointed with ACM’s decision to penalize them. The company said it never forced them, and they have always been free to decide and apply their own strategy for selling their products.
Finally, the Associated Press News reported that Samsung would file an appeal as it believes it did not violate any rules as alleged. Still, the Dutch watchdog said that the company should have known that its moves to influence the TV prices went far beyond the normal guidance. It said that the undue influence to the online retailers was damaging to a healthy competition atmosphere.
“Under the pretense of ‘price recommendations,’ Samsung made sure that retailers increased their prices to the market price that Samsung desired,” Martijn Snoep, ACM’s board chairman, said in a statement. “Samsung’s practices disrupted competition at the retail level, and resulted in higher prices for consumers.”


Natura Q2 Profit Plunges 92% as Financial Expenses Weigh on Earnings
South Korean Won Leads Asian FX Losses as Dollar Rises
Trump Media Says Truth API Draws 10+ Customers as Conflict Concerns Grow
Singapore Raises 2026 GDP Growth Forecast as AI Demand Fuels Economy
Deutsche Bank Upgrades Persimmon to Buy After Strong First-Half Results
Apple Tests China’s CXMT Memory Chips for iPhones and MacBooks Amid AI Supply Crunch
Alibaba Plans Revenue-Sharing Model for Qwen3.8-Max AI Commercial Users
Japan Executives Warn Weak Yen and Currency Volatility Threaten Economy
Gold Prices Rise as Fed Rate Hike Bets Ease
Airbus Joins Air India A320 Altitude Drop Probe
China Inflation Cools in July as CPI Misses Forecast, PPI Deflation Eases
UOB Q2 Net Profit Rises 10% as Wealth Management Growth Boosts Earnings
Yen Stabilizes After Intervention Slide as Australian Dollar Hits Eight-Week High
Gold Price Hits Two-Month High as Investors Await US Inflation Data
Asian Currencies Steady as Markets Await U.S. Inflation Data
Delta Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Atlanta After Cockpit Fumes Reported
Nvidia Secures $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Push With Wall Street Giants 



