Jared Isaacman Confirmed as NASA Administrator, Becomes 15th Leader of U.S. Space Agency 
Blue Origin’s New Glenn Achieves Breakthrough Success With First NASA Mission 
SpaceX Delays Starship V3 Launch Ahead of Potential Record IPO 
Neuralink Plans High-Volume Brain Implant Production and Fully Automated Surgery by 2026 
Trump Signs Executive Order to Boost AI Research in Childhood Cancer 
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision 
Eli Lilly’s Inluriyo Gains FDA Approval for Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment 
SpaceX’s Starship Completes 11th Test Flight, Paving Way for Moon and Mars Missions 
Is space worth the cost? Accounting experts say its value can’t be found in spreadsheets 
NASA Artemis II: First Crewed Moon Mission Since Apollo Takes Four Astronauts on 10-Day Lunar Journey 
Trump Administration Releases New UFO Files and Apollo Mission Records 
Blue Origin New Glenn Explosion Could Delay Launch Operations Until 2028 
Add as a preferred source on Google
It’s always the same story. Governments want to use science as a weapon of mass destruction, certain members of the scientific community speak up about the potential consequences, and the debates ensue. In the case of New Zealand, a plan to use genetic engineering to kill off invasive species such as rats and possums is being proposed. Experts, on the other hand, want to caution the public of the potential backlash of genetic weaponry going out of control.
What New Zealand wants to do is called “gene drive system,” Futurism report, and it essentially involves genetically modifying certain members of a species. When these subjects are released into the wild and mate, they will pass on genes that will have a certain effect. In the case of the pests plaguing the country, the effect is either the reduction of their numbers or the complete decimation of the species.
In an effort to clarify what the effects of such a move would be, the University of Otago’ Neil Gemmell Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Kevin Esvelt published a paper that looked at the potential consequences of this proposition. Gemmell also told Futurism that the point to the paper was not to oppose “gene drive system,” but rather, to encourage a discussion around it.
“I think it is important to point out that our piece is aimed at informing and provoking discussion about gene drives in a global context and that we are not against gene drive technology per se, or indeed opposed to the idea of exploring this technology as a component of the technical solutions that will enable New Zealand’s predator-free goal,” Gemmell said.
The biggest concern that geneticists have with regards to the concept of weaponizing gene-editing tools is the matter of control. Precisely targeting a specific set of genes in a targeted group of species is not easy. The consequences of engineering a gene that could wipe out entire species suddenly going after the wrong targets would be equivalent to introducing a new and even more devastating invasive species to the ecosystem.
