In 2010, a small study was conducted regarding certain poses that are supposed to exude confidence and power, which resulted in researchers trumpeting the merits of so-called “power poses.” Unfortunately, a new study suggests that this is not only ineffective, it can also backfire on the ones doing the poses.
The 2010 study failed to produce expected results when it was finally done on a large scale in 2015, Slate reports. At this point, the research was already hailed as a huge inspiration for those who are lacking in confidence, even getting 36 million views on YouTube when the findings were presented during a TED Talk.
As it turns out, the methodology used during the 2010 study were quite flawed and the scale of the research was far too limited to have been blown out of proportion as it was. Because of this, the lead author of the study, Dana Carney disavowed the research and its results.
Unfortunately, the misunderstandings caused by the publication and widespread misinformation regarding the research remains even today. Just to make the matter absolutely clear, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania conducted a study looking into power poses and concluded that it actually achieves the opposite of the desired effect.
One of the researchers behind the study is Coren Apicella, MedixalXpress reports, and she said that power posing for the sake of appearing strong has a negative effect on the hormones that provide such a state. Specifically, testosterone.
"We did find that if anything—and we're skeptical of these results because we'd want to replicate them—that, if you're a loser and you take a winner or high power pose, your testosterone decreases," Apicella said.
“Losers” is, of course, a coarse way of describing individuals who have limited self-esteem and self-confidence. Even so, the point still remains. If the subject does not naturally feel powerful, no amount of power-posing is going to help.


UBS Predicts Potential Fed Rate Cut Amid Strong US Economic Data
US Gas Market Poised for Supercycle: Bernstein Analysts
Yes, government influences wages – but not just in the way you might think
US Futures Rise as Investors Eye Earnings, Inflation Data, and Wildfire Impacts
AI is driving down the price of knowledge – universities have to rethink what they offer
Urban studies: Doing research when every city is different
S&P 500 Relies on Tech for Growth in Q4 2024, Says Barclays
Oil Prices Dip Slightly Amid Focus on Russian Sanctions and U.S. Inflation Data
European Stocks Rally on Chinese Growth and Mining Merger Speculation
Britain has almost 1 million young people not in work or education – here’s what evidence shows can change that
China’s Growth Faces Structural Challenges Amid Doubts Over Data
Disaster or digital spectacle? The dangers of using floods to create social media content
U.S. Stocks vs. Bonds: Are Diverging Valuations Signaling a Shift?
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder
Moldova Criticizes Russia Amid Transdniestria Energy Crisis
6 simple questions to tell if a ‘finfluencer’ is more flash than cash
The American mass exodus to Canada amid Trump 2.0 has yet to materialize 



