ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan Suspended as Member States Consider Removal 
SoftBank Shares Drop as OpenAI Losses and Rising Costs Spark Investor Concerns 
DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury 
US Stock Futures Jump on Reports of Preliminary US-Iran Peace Deal Despite Fed’s Hawkish Outlook 
Japan Signals Readiness to Intervene as USD/JPY Nears 161 Amid Yen Weakness 
Russia Stocks End Flat as MOEX Index Hits New 52-Week Low; Gold Falls and Oil Mixed 
DOJ Pushes to Resume Trump White House Ballroom Project After Security Incident 
Trump Says No Hormuz Strait Tolls During 60-Day Iran Ceasefire 
Saudi Aramco Explores Sulphur Business Stake Sale to Raise Billions 
HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures 
Trump Team Rejects BBC Financial Data Request in $10B Lawsuit 
Asian Currencies Stabilize as Dollar Holds Near Two-Month High After Fed Hawkish Signal 
US Raises Concerns Over Possible ASML EUV Machine Transfer to China 
Brazil Supreme Court Convicts Eduardo Bolsonaro Over U.S. Lobbying Efforts 
DOJ Sues UCLA Over Alleged Antisemitism and Hostile Campus Environment 
Canada Imposes 10% Tariff on Canned Vegetable Imports to Protect Domestic Industry 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
