Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico 
Gold Prices Rise as Weak US Data and Hormuz Risks Boost Safe-Haven Demand 
Schott Pharma Stock Rises as Barclays Upgrades Rating on Growth Outlook 
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Bid to Reinstate $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee 
US Stock Futures Steady as Cooling Inflation and Strong Earnings Support Markets 
BofA Sees Micron EPS Topping $230 by 2030, Backs Major Stock Upside 
Hermès Stock Downgraded by RBC as Luxury Growth Premium Narrows 
US Eyes Refinery Boost as Trump Seeks Relief From High Gas Prices 
Oil Prices Steady as Strait of Hormuz Traffic Slows Amid US-Iran Conflict 
Barclays Warns U.S. Stock Rally May Be Detached From Fundamentals 
China Automakers Accelerate Global Expansion as Domestic Car Sales Slump 
Maduro, U.S. Prosecutors Propose June 2027 Trial Date in Drug Trafficking Case 
Peru Court Frees Former President Ollanta Humala After Conviction Overturned 
Juan Orlando Hernandez Seeks Dismissal of Honduras Charges After Trump Pardon 
Sun Pharma Wins U.S. Appeal in Pfizer Lipitor Antitrust Case 
Goldman Sachs Eyes Investors for Nvidia’s $500 Billion AI Financing Plan 
J.P. Morgan Upgrades SanDisk, Sets $2,250 Price Target on AI NAND Growth 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
