Gold Prices Surge as U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Talks Spark Market Optimism 
SoftwareONE Posts 22.5% Revenue Surge in 2025 on Crayon Acquisition 
FEMA Reinstates $1 Billion Disaster Prevention Grant Program After Court Order 
Trump's Iran War Speech Sparks Market Anxiety Over Extended Conflict 
Fonterra Admits Anchor Butter "Grass-Fed" Label Misled Consumers After Greenpeace Lawsuit 
Trump Administration Plans 100% Tariffs on Pharmaceutical Imports 
Microsoft Backs Anthropic in Legal Fight Against Pentagon's AI Blacklist 
DOJ Backs Jeanine Pirro-Led Investigation Into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell 
Stellantis Shareholder Fraud Lawsuit Dismissed by U.S. Judge 
Apple Turns 50: From Garage Startup to AI Crossroads 
RBC Capital: European Medtech Firms Show Minimal Middle East and Energy Risk Exposure 
Bank of America's $72.5M Epstein Settlement: What You Need to Know 
U.S. Stocks Surge on Iran War De-escalation Hopes 
Bolsonaro Hospitalized in ICU with Bronchopneumonia Amid Calls for House Arrest 
CTOC Adds 3,000 Doctors, 500 Hospitals Ahead of Liquidity Push 
Norma Group Posts Revenue Decline in 2025, Eyes Modest Recovery in 2026 
Judge Dismisses Sam Altman Sexual Abuse Lawsuit, But Sister Can Refile 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
