Japan Finance Minister Defends PM Takaichi’s Remarks on Weak Yen Benefits 
EU Recovery Fund Faces Bottlenecks Despite Driving Digital and Green Projects 
Federal Reserve Faces Subpoena Delay Amid Investigation Into Chair Jerome Powell 
SoftBank and Intel Partner to Develop Next-Generation Memory Chips for AI Data Centers 
Nvidia’s $100 Billion OpenAI Investment Faces Internal Doubts, Report Says 
South Korea Inflation Hits Five-Month Low as CPI Reaches Central Bank Target 
Asian Currencies Strengthen as Indian Rupee and Australian Dollar Rally 
Palantir Stock Jumps After Strong Q4 Earnings Beat and Upbeat 2026 Revenue Forecast 
Starmer’s China Visit Highlights Western Balancing Act Amid U.S.-China Rivalry 
Trump Administration Appeals Judge’s Order Limiting ICE Tactics in Minneapolis 
Oracle Plans $45–$50 Billion Funding Push in 2026 to Expand Cloud and AI Infrastructure 
Brazil Supreme Court Orders Asset Freeze of Nelson Tanure Amid Banco Master Investigation 
Disney Board Nears CEO Decision as Josh D’Amaro Emerges as Leading Candidate 
Gold and Asian Stocks Rebound as Market Volatility Eases and Global Sentiment Improves 
Jensen Huang Urges Taiwan Suppliers to Boost AI Chip Production Amid Surging Demand 
American Airlines Plans Return to Venezuela Flights After U.S. Lifts Ban 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
