Epstein Files: Key Figures Named in DOJ Document Release 
Federal Judge Dismisses DOJ Lawsuit Attempting to Block Hawaii's Climate Case Against Oil Giants 
SpaceX Eyes $60B Cursor Deal to Boost AI Power Ahead of IPO 
LG Innotek Stock Hits Record High on $68M Automotive Wi-Fi 7 Deal 
Intel Stock Surges as AI Chip Demand Drives Strong Q2 Forecast 
Dollar Gains as Middle East Tensions and Rising Oil Prices Support Safe-Haven Demand 
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit 
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles 
Annie Altman Amends Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman 
Iran-Pakistan Diplomacy and Strait of Hormuz Tensions Push Oil Prices Above $100 
Florida Launches Criminal Probe Into OpenAI Over FSU Shooting Incident 
RFK Jr. Expands CDC Vaccine Advisory Panel's Scope Amid Legal Battles 
U.S. Disrupts Russian Military Hackers' Global DNS Hijacking Network 
Argentina Court Upholds Cristina Kirchner Asset Seizure in Corruption Case 
SK Hynix Reports Record Q1 Profit Surge Driven by AI Memory Chip Demand 
Fonterra Admits Anchor Butter "Grass-Fed" Label Misled Consumers After Greenpeace Lawsuit 
U.S. Raises Alarm Over Chinese AI Firms’ Alleged IP Theft Through Model Distillation 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
