New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure 
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 
Dollar Steadies Ahead of ECB and BoE Decisions as Markets Turn Risk-Off 
South Korea’s Weak Won Struggles as Retail Investors Pour Money Into U.S. Stocks 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
U.S. Stock Futures Slide as Tech Rout Deepens on Amazon Capex Shock 
Dow Hits 50,000 as U.S. Stocks Stage Strong Rebound Amid AI Volatility 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate 
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action 
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
