Japan Economy Poised for Q4 2025 Growth as Investment and Consumption Hold Firm 
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project 
Gold and Silver Prices Slide as Dollar Strength and Easing Tensions Weigh on Metals 
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality 
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action 
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions 
U.S. Stock Futures Slide as Tech Rout Deepens on Amazon Capex Shock 
Fed Governor Lisa Cook Warns Inflation Risks Remain as Rates Stay Steady 
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
Dollar Steadies Ahead of ECB and BoE Decisions as Markets Turn Risk-Off 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
