The U.S. Senate has approved a war powers resolution directing President Donald Trump to halt U.S. military involvement in Iran, marking a significant congressional challenge to the administration’s foreign policy. The measure passed the Senate in a 50-48 vote after previously clearing the House of Representatives, reflecting growing concern among lawmakers about the ongoing U.S.-Iran conflict.
The resolution follows the military campaign that began on February 28, when the United States and Israel launched attacks against Iran. While the measure is largely symbolic and faces uncertain legal standing, it represents the first time since the War Powers Act of 1973 that both chambers of Congress have passed legislation seeking to remove U.S. armed forces from active hostilities.
The vote highlighted increasing divisions within the Republican Party. Four Republican senators—Susan Collins, Rand Paul, Bill Cassidy, and Lisa Murkowski—joined nearly all Democrats in supporting the resolution. Democratic Senator John Fetterman voted against the measure, while two Republican senators were absent.
President Trump dismissed the resolution as “poorly timed and meaningless,” arguing that it complicates ongoing efforts to negotiate peace with Iran. The White House maintains that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional and insists the resolution carries no legal force because it does not require presidential approval. Administration officials also argue that hostilities effectively ended with a ceasefire reached on April 7.
Legal experts remain divided over the resolution’s enforceability. A 1983 Supreme Court ruling suggested that congressional measures require presidential signature or veto to become legally binding, creating uncertainty over the authority of war powers resolutions. Many analysts believe the issue could ultimately be decided in federal courts.
The Senate vote comes amid declining public support for the conflict. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll found that only one-quarter of Americans believe the war with Iran was worth its cost, while most respondents expressed concern that any ceasefire agreement may not endure.
Lawmakers are also preparing to review future peace negotiations with Tehran, particularly if they involve Iran’s nuclear program. Congressional leaders have indicated that any major Iran peace agreement is likely to face formal review and a vote in Congress, ensuring continued debate over U.S. policy toward Iran.


Bill Gates Warns Governments Are Unprepared for AI Disruption
What is Zionism? The different meanings of a contested term
Ukraine Races to Counter Russia’s Faster Jet-Powered Drones
US Confirms Weapons in Orbit as Space Tensions Rise
Houthis Escalate Saudi Attacks as Red Sea Oil Risks Grow
Mahmoud Khalil Sues Columbia Over Alleged Pro-Palestinian Harassment
Banking scandal rocks Brazil’s politics and the country’s presidential election in October
Lula, Flavio Bolsonaro Deadlocked in Brazil Election Polls
Judge Blocks Trump Rule Limiting Foreign Student Visas
Kim Jong Un Pledges Deeper Russia Cooperation
U.S. Imposes New Visa Restrictions Over South Africa Policies
Trump Rejects Calls for Tougher AI Regulation
Trump Touts $5,000 Checks if Republicans Win Congress
Guterres Urges Stronger Global AI Safeguards Ahead of UN Assembly
UK PM Andy Burnham Set for First Trump Meeting in New York
Sweden Election: Centre-Left Holds Narrow Lead 



