Uber is set to shell out $1.1 million after an arbitrator determined some of the company’s drivers refused to give a ride to a blind woman and her guide dog. It was reported that this happened to the said woman not once but 14 times on different occasions.
As per Fox Business, Lisa Irving who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area brought up her complaint against Uber in 2018. She said that the taxi-hailing company drivers either denied her a ride or she was harassed by them as they don’t want to transport her with her guide dog.
Lisa’s complaints against Uber
In her narration, Irving said that Uber drivers often refused to serve her because of the guide dog that is really important to her. She was also verbally abused and these incidents happened to her more than a dozen times from 2016 to 2018.
"I felt demeaned, humiliated, devalued, embarrassed, angered, frustrated and violated," Irving said in a video statement posted by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane & Conway law firm. She is being represented by Atty. Adam Wolf.
The blind woman alleged that since drivers denied her a ride, she was left stranded at night late for work. She explained her tardiness may have been a factor why she was fired. Her lawyers added that Irving suffered from intimidation and verbal abuse that did not stop even after she voiced out her complaints to Uber.
"Of all Americans who should be liberated by the rideshare revolution, the blind and visually impaired are among those who stand to benefit the most,” Atty. Catherine Cabalo, one of Irving's lawyers, told the BBC News. “However, the track record of major rideshare services has been spotty at best and openly discriminatory at worst."
The lawyer went on to say that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a guide dog should be allowed to go anywhere with a blind person. Thus, the drivers may have violated this rule too.
Uber’s response to the ruling
After the ruling was released, Uber issued a statement through its spokesperson. The ride-sharing company said it is proud of the help it usually offers to its blind passengers.
"Drivers using the Uber app are expected to serve riders with service animals and comply with accessibility and other laws, and we regularly provide education to drivers on that responsibility,” Uber’s spokesman said. "Our dedicated team looks into each complaint and takes appropriate action."
Despite this, the arbitrator ruled that Uber is liable for violations in the ADA as it failed to prevent discrimination by training its drivers concerning servicing people with disabilities. The law also bars firms from refusing to transport a person with a guide dog.


UBS Upgrades L’Oréal to Buy, Sees Strong Sales Momentum and 20% Upside
Johnson & Johnson Secures Tariff Exemption by Agreeing to Lower Drug Prices in the U.S.
Nvidia Appoints Former Google Executive Alison Wagonfeld as First Chief Marketing Officer
Stellantis to End Plug-In Hybrid Sales in the U.S. as Demand Shifts Toward Traditional Hybrids
AustralianSuper Backs BlueScope Steel’s Rejection of $9 Billion Takeover Bid
Allegiant to Acquire Sun Country Airlines in $1.5 Billion Deal to Expand U.S. Leisure Travel Network
Hanwha Ocean Shares Rise on Plans to Expand U.S. Shipbuilding Capacity
Rio Tinto–Glencore Merger Talks Spark Investor Debate Over Value, Strategy and Coal Exposure
GM Takes $6 Billion EV Write-Down as Electric Vehicle Demand Slows in the U.S.
Boeing 737 MAX 10 Advances in FAA Testing as Certification Delays Continue
Aktis Oncology Prices Upsized IPO at $18, Raising $318 Million in Major Biotech Debut
EU Orders Elon Musk’s X to Preserve Grok AI Data Amid Probe Into Illegal Content
Trump Calls for 10% Credit Card Interest Rate Cap Starting 2026
FTC Blocks Edwards Lifesciences’ JenaValve Acquisition in Major Antitrust Ruling
Anthropic Launches HIPAA-Compliant Healthcare Tools for Claude AI Amid Growing Competition
China’s AI Sector Pushes to Close U.S. Tech Gap Amid Chipmaking Challenges
xAI Cash Burn Highlights the High Cost of Competing in Generative AI 



