The United States has officially withdrawn from the World Health Organization (WHO), marking a significant shift in global health policy that experts warn could harm public health both domestically and worldwide. The decision follows a year of escalating warnings from health leaders and international officials who argued that leaving the United Nations health agency would weaken global disease surveillance and response systems.
President Donald Trump initiated the withdrawal on the first day of his presidency in 2025 through an executive order, citing what the administration described as the WHO’s failures in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. According to a joint press release from the U.S. Departments of Health and State, the United States will no longer participate fully in WHO activities and has no plans to rejoin or even serve as an observer. Instead, the U.S. intends to collaborate directly with individual countries on public health priorities, including disease monitoring and emergency response.
A key point of contention involves unpaid membership fees. Under U.S. law, the country was expected to provide one year’s notice and settle approximately $260 million in outstanding dues before exiting. However, State Department officials dispute that payment is a legal prerequisite for withdrawal, arguing that American taxpayers have already contributed sufficiently. The Department of Health and Human Services confirmed that all U.S. funding to the WHO has ended, stating the organization’s actions had cost the U.S. trillions of dollars.
The withdrawal has already triggered major consequences. The U.S. flag was removed from WHO headquarters in Geneva, and the agency has entered a financial crisis. As its largest donor, contributing about 18% of total funding, the U.S. exit has forced the WHO to cut its management team, reduce budgets, and plan to lay off roughly a quarter of its staff by mid-year.
Global health leaders, including WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Gates Foundation chair Bill Gates, have urged the U.S. to reconsider. While a quick return appears unlikely, experts stress that the absence of U.S. leadership could weaken international cooperation and increase risks to global health security.


FAA Proposes Inspections for Boeing 737 MAX Passenger Seats Over Installation Concern
UN Warns of Rising Israeli Settler Violence in West Bank as Palestinian Death Toll Grows
U.S., Saudi Forces Launch Precision Strikes on Iran-Backed Militants in Iraq
NTSB Leads Investigation Into Ryanair Boeing 737 Engine Failure Over Greece
EEOC Drops Penn Subpoena in Antisemitism Probe, Investigation Continues
Spain Deploys Troops as Ceuta Faces Major Migrant Surge From Morocco
Ukraine Drones Strike Russian Oil Refineries, Wildberries Warehouses as Cross-Border Attacks Escalate
FDA Investigates New Cyclospora Outbreak as U.S. Cases Continue to Rise
Is Netanyahu’s star waning in Washington? His latest meeting with Trump suggests it may be
Trump Announces Hamas Disarmament Deal Under Gaza Peace Plan
FCC Moves to Ban Imports of Foreign Military-Grade Drones Over Security Risks
Trump, Zelenskiy Discuss Patriot Missile Production and Ukraine Peace Talks
AI Avatar of Jair Bolsonaro Sparks Legal Battle Ahead of Brazil’s 2026 Presidential Election
X Challenges Australia’s Expanded Social Media Ban Enforcement Powers
Global Leaders Push Back as Trump Imposes New Forced Labor Tariffs
HRW Accuses Russia’s Africa Corps of Deadly Airstrike on Mali Civilians
Brazil Rejects Visas for Trump Officials Ahead of Presidential Election 



