Pierre Poilievre Retains Conservative Leadership After Election Defeat in Canada 
Russian Drone Strike Kills Miners as Ukraine Pushes for Peace Talks Amid Energy Crisis 
Trump Orders DHS to Avoid Protests in Democratic Cities Unless Federal Assets Are Threatened 
Japan Election Poll Signals Landslide Win for Sanae Takaichi, Raising Fiscal Policy Concerns 
Starmer’s China Visit Highlights Western Balancing Act Amid U.S.-China Rivalry 
Zelenskiy Awaits U.S. Details as Ukraine Prepares for Possible Peace Talks Next Week 
U.S. Government Enters Brief Shutdown as Congress Delays Funding Deal 
Putin Envoy Kirill Dmitriev to Visit Miami for Talks With Trump Administration Officials 
Christian Menefee Wins Texas Special Election, Narrowing GOP House Majority 
Why Trump’s new pick for Fed chair hit gold and silver markets – for good reasons 
Keir Starmer Urges Prince Andrew to Testify in U.S. Epstein Investigation 
U.S. and Israeli Military Leaders Hold Pentagon Talks as Tensions With Iran Escalate 
Syria Detains Group Over Rocket Attacks on Damascus Military Airport Amid Hezbollah Allegations 
Kevin Warsh’s Fed Nomination Raises Questions Over Corporate Ties and U.S.–South Korea Trade Tensions 
Venezuela Proposes Amnesty Law and Plans to Transform Helicoide Prison 
Syria-Kurdish Ceasefire Marks Historic Step Toward National Unity 
Jill Wine-Banks, a former Watergate prosecutor, has ignited a firestorm with her controversial suggestion that President Joe Biden issue preemptive pardons to himself and key figures, including Special Counsel Jack Smith. Her proposal, aired during a public discussion, comes amid growing concerns over potential retaliatory actions from the incoming Trump administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ).
Wine-Banks argued that proactive pardons could shield Biden and his allies from politically motivated prosecutions under President-elect Donald Trump. Her comments have divided opinion, with critics accusing her of undermining the rule of law while supporters claim such measures are necessary to protect democratic institutions.
Pardoning Himself: Legal and Ethical Quagmire
Wine-Banks’ suggestion that Biden preemptively pardon himself has stirred significant debate over the constitutional implications. Historically, no U.S. president has pardoned themselves, and legal scholars remain divided on whether such an action is even permissible. Critics argue that a self-pardon would set a dangerous precedent, potentially eroding public trust in the justice system.
Proponents, however, view the move as a defensive strategy against anticipated investigations and charges from a Trump-led DOJ. They cite Trump’s previous threats to prosecute political opponents as evidence of the risks Biden faces.
Extending Pardons to Allies
Wine-Banks also proposed pardoning Jack Smith, who led investigations into Trump’s actions during his presidency. This aspect of her suggestion has drawn accusations of partisanship, with opponents claiming it would politicize the pardon power. Yet supporters counter that it could prevent the weaponization of federal agencies against public servants simply doing their jobs.
Online Reactions Highlight Deep Divisions
The proposal has sparked a heated debate online, with netizens weighing in from across the political spectrum:
- @JusticeForAll: “If Trump can pardon his cronies, why can’t Biden protect those who uphold democracy? It’s only fair.”
- @LibertyFirst: “Biden pardoning himself? This is the kind of thing that makes people lose faith in government.”
- @BlueWave2024: “Jill Wine-Banks is absolutely right. We need to protect our leaders from Trump’s vendetta machine.”
- @PatriotGuard99: “This idea is insane. No one should be above the law, not Trump and definitely not Biden.”
- @DemocracyDefender: “If Biden pardons himself, he loses the moral high ground forever. Terrible idea.”
- @FreedomNow88: “Preemptive pardons? Sounds like something out of a dictatorship. America deserves better leadership than this.”
