Xiaomi recently filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Treasury and Department of Defense in its bid to overturn the decision to blacklist the company. The Chinese smartphone manufacturer wants its name removed from the Communist Chinese military company list that was created during Donald Trump’s administration.
The ongoing U.S. and Xiaomi saga is escalating, and it seems that the end is nowhere in sight. Xiaomi was branded as the Chinese military company when Trump signed Executive Order 13959 in November 2019. The EO stated that Americans are prohibited from investing or working with Chinese companies due to threats to the nation’s security; thus, the brand was also pulled out from the U.S. market.
Why Xiaomi sued the U.S.
Xiaomi has now taken a step to reverse the decision against them and sued under Joe Biden’s administration. As per Reuters, the smartphone maker stated that its decision to file a complaint in the U.S. to protect its interest.
Xiaomi further said that the US’ move to list them as a “communist Chinese military company” was wrong and saying, it was “factually incorrect.” The company added that they were denied legal, due process, and this is another reason why they are asking the US court to declare the decision illegal.
The lawsuit was filed at a district court on Jan. 29. It has also named Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen as defendants.
"With a view to protecting the interests of the global users, partners, employees and shareholders of Xiaomi, the company has pleaded to the courts to declare the decision illegal and that it be reversed," The Daily Tribune quoted a statement from Xiaomi.
Xiaomi declares non-affiliation with the Chinese military
In any case, Xiaomi has been pointing out that the company is not affiliated or co-owned by any individual or group that has links with the Chinese military. It stated that 75% of the company’s voting rights were handled by co-founders Lei Jun and Lin Bin and not other persons or entities.
“Xiaomi is not owned or controlled or otherwise affiliated with the Chinese government or military, nor is it owned or controlled by any entity affiliated with the Chinese defense industrial base,” the firm reiterated in the filing.


Honda Leadership Crisis Deepens as Retired Executives Challenge CEO Toshihiro Mibe’s Strategy
OpenAI Eyes Massive 10GW Ohio Data Center Campus in Potential $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Deal
Frasers Group Launches €2 Billion Hugo Boss Takeover Offer Amid Control Speculation
Exxon Mobil Set to Appoint Alex Volkov as Global Trading Chief
GM and Peak Energy Partner to Advance Sodium-Ion Battery Technology for Grid Storage
Asics Considers Onitsuka Tiger Spinoff as Luxury Sneaker Brand Expands Globally
Meta AI Strategy Faces Challenges as Zuckerberg Admits Mistakes in Internal Memo
BHP Port Hedland Workers Back Strike Action Amid Pay Dispute
Changchun Targets EV Growth as China’s Auto Industry Consolidation Accelerates
EngineAI Files for Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising Demand for AI and Robotics Stocks
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions
Astera Labs and Rocket Lab Surge After Nasdaq-100 Inclusion Announcement
SpaceX IPO Demand Surges Past $250 Billion Ahead of Historic Market Debut
Roku Explores Sale Options as Interest Grows in Streaming and Ad Business
oOh!media Takeover Battle Intensifies as Bain Capital Joins Competing Bids
SK Hynix Stock Rebounds as AI Memory Chip Demand Fuels Expansion Plans
Adobe Beats Q2 2026 Estimates, Raises Full-Year Outlook as AI Revenue Surges Despite Stock Drop 



