U.S. Probes Apex Logistics Over Nvidia AI Chip Shipments to China 
OpenAI AI Agent Swarm Behind Hugging Face Hack 
Meta Agrees to $18 Billion Settlement, Tightens Teen Social Media Rules 
Nvidia Eyes Perplexity Investment at $30 Billion Valuation 
Xiaomi Unveils Xring O3 Chip for Flagship Foldable Phone 
New Zealand Moves to Ban Social Media for Children Under 16 
Countries Tighten Social Media Bans for Children 
Google Expands Gemini Enterprise With AI Tools for Legal Sector 
SK Hynix Shares Fall as Workers Reject Wage Deal 
Faraday Future Delivers First Robots in Middle East, Plans September Launches 
U.S. Disrupts China-Linked Hacking Campaign Targeting Government Agencies 
Trump Buys SpaceX Shares After Record IPO 
HP Stock Drops 9% Despite Q3 Earnings Beat and Raised 2026 Outlook 
SoftBank Plans Record $6.3 Billion Bond Sale to Fund OpenAI Investments 
Pinterest Stock Falls as CFO Julia Brau Donnelly Resigns 
PayPal Shares Sink as $50 Billion Takeover Bid Collapses 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Web browser Safari is currently under fire from advertising companies for its decision to protect its users from being tracked when surfing the internet. This is a matter that has been a hot-button issue for everyone involved, with tech firms usually siding with marketers in taking advantage of users. Now that a huge internet browser is finally taking a stand, ad companies are lashing out with a vengeance.
The new user-protection feature isn’t out yet. It will be coming with the Safari 11 update and the feature will be named Intelligent Tracking Prevention, CNET reports. As the name suggests, it basically stops outside entities from tracking what users do on the internet, which is why it’s no surprise that advertisers are absolutely livid over this development.
Several marketers actually banded together to send a letter to Apple, chastising the company for daring to put the needs of its users above that of corporations. Six ad groups are basically trying to convince the iPhone maker that it should change its mind lest the feature do great harm to the internet.
“The infrastructure of the modern internet depends on consistent and generally applicable standards for cookies, so digital companies can innovate to build content, services, and advertising that are personalized for users and remember their visits,” the letter reads. “Apple's Safari move breaks those standards and replaces them with an amorphous set of shifting rules that will hurt the user experience and sabotage the economic model for the internet.”
The gist of the advertising companies’ argument is that if they can no longer personalize ads, services like Facebook and YouTube are going to be in a lot of trouble. As Ad Week notes, Safari isn’t the first browser to impose user protection services since Google has been testing a new kind of ad blocker on Chrome. Then again, the Apple browser is likely the only one that’s actually capable of pissing off advertisers without any real consequences to it.
