In a pivotal antitrust battle, Apple has requested a U.S. judge dismiss the DOJ lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of stifling competition in the smartphone market. The case is the latest in ongoing scrutiny of Big Tech practices.
Apple Moves to Dismiss DOJ Antitrust Case
On Wednesday, in the latest Big Tech antitrust clash, Apple requested that a federal judge dismiss the U.S. Department of Justice's complaint that accused the iPhone maker of unjustly controlling the smartphone market, Reuters reports
While arguing before U.S. District Judge Julien Neals in Newark, New Jersey, Apple's legal team cited many reasons why the government's case ought to be dismissed and urged the judge to restrict discovery. When those involved in a case share information with one another, it's called discovery.
Apple attorney Devora Allon stated, "The government has failed to plausibly allege that Apple has monopoly power."
By limiting the compatibility between the iPhone and third-party apps and gadgets, the prosecution is expected to claim that the business locks customers in and keeps competitors out.
Apple’s Defense: Protecting Innovation or Blocking Competition?
Apple is attempting to get the case dismissed on the grounds that it had good reasons to limit developers' access to its technology and that sharing its secrets with rivals would stifle innovation.
Filing antitrust lawsuits against large tech companies is becoming more common, and it's happening across party lines. The lawsuit against Apple was initiated under President Joe Biden's administration and continued during President Donald Trump's first term in office.
Also, Google, owned by Alphabet, was deemed to have an illegal monopoly on internet search; Meta Platforms is on trial for allegedly buying out competitors; and Amazon.com is embroiled in a dispute over its treatment of vendors and sellers.
Claims that were central to the Apple case, for example, did not succeed in the end, Yahoo Finance shares.
Antitrust Rulings That Could Shape the Apple Case
Meta, the social media platform, was found guilty by a judge of imposing unreasonable limitations on third-party app developers. The FTC had sued Meta for this reason.
A judge in the Google search lawsuit ruled against the search engine giant, saying it should have gone above and beyond to help out Bing ads.
In its own case, Apple referenced the ruling, arguing that it proves that denying access to technology is not anticompetitive.
The Department of Justice and a group of states sued Apple in March, claiming that the tech company was unfairly limiting competition from third-party products and services including smartwatches, digital wallets, and messaging apps.
The case can proceed if the judge thinks the allegations have any merit.


Moody’s Downgrades Mexico Credit Rating Amid Rising Debt and Fiscal Pressure
Dollar Slips as Risk Appetite Grows Amid Nvidia Rally and Iran Peace Hopes
PDG Explores $1 Billion Sale of China Data Center Assets
Gold Prices Slip as Iran Conflict and Fed Rate Hike Fears Weigh on Market Sentiment
Spying, Southampton and economic pressure cooker of the ‘richest match in football’
Japan Inflation Falls Below BOJ Target as Energy Subsidies Ease Consumer Pressure
Cuba needs a long-term solution to its energy crisis
China vs U.S. AI Race Shifts Toward Robotics and Manufacturing Power in 2026
SoftBank Shares Surge as OpenAI IPO Buzz and SB Energy Filing Boost AI Optimism
H.B. Fuller Eyes Advanced Medical Solutions in Potential £600M Takeover Deal
OpenAI Eyes IPO Filing as Early as This Week Amid Rising AI Competition
ECB Warns Euro Zone Inflation Will Keep Rising Despite Strait of Hormuz Reopening
Australia Regulator Flags Private Credit Risks Amid Global Market Uncertainty
X Corp Loses Legal Battle Over Australia Child Safety Fine
Intuit Raises Full-Year Forecast After Strong Q3 Earnings Despite Stock Drop
Texas Sues Meta Over WhatsApp Encryption Claims
Google Expands AI Partnership With Singapore Government 



