AMP Shares Surge 13% After Strong Profit and A$150 Million Buyback 
Maduro U.S. Drug Trafficking Trial Set for June 2027 as Immunity Defense Looms 
Airbus Joins Air India A320 Altitude Drop Probe 
Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for Austal US Business 
Shein Scales Back Vietnam Operations as US Trade Rules Shift 
Brazil Supreme Court Approves Probe Into Lula’s Son Over Health Ministry Lobbying Claims 
Austal Shares Surge 16% as Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for U.S. Shipbuilding Business 
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight 
Civil Rights Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Childcare Funding Freeze and Influencer's Role 
Judge Approves Anthropic’s $1.5 Billion AI Copyright Settlement With Authors 
Berkshire Hathaway Cash Falls as Abel Boosts Stock Buybacks 
US Supreme Court Lets $655.5 Million Judgment Against Palestinian Authorities Stand During Appeal 
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief 
Natura Q2 Profit Plunges 92% as Financial Expenses Weigh on Earnings 
25 Democratic-Led States Sue Trump Administration Over New Global Tariffs 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Delayed Until 2027 Amid Antitrust Lawsuit 
Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico 
Apple has been ordered to pay $502 million to Texas-based Optis Cellular Technology LLC for using 4G-related patents in its iPhones and iPads, following a ruling by London’s Court of Appeal on Thursday. The decision marks the latest development in a years-long legal battle over standard-essential patents and fair licensing terms.
The dispute began in 2019 when Optis sued Apple in London, claiming the tech giant used its patents—essential to 4G wireless standards—without proper licensing. In 2023, London’s High Court initially awarded Optis $56.43 million plus interest for Apple’s past and future patent use. However, Optis challenged the amount, arguing it undervalued the global license Apple obtained.
In a partially redacted judgment, the appeals court sided with Optis, stating that Apple must pay a lump sum of $502 million, excluding interest, for the 2013–2027 licensing period. The ruling applies to a global license covering Optis’ portfolio of standard-essential patents.
An Apple spokesperson expressed disappointment and confirmed plans to appeal the decision. “Optis makes no products and their sole business is to sue companies using patents they buy,” the spokesperson said, accusing the company of seeking excessive compensation.
Optis, a non-practicing entity, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The case centers around the interpretation of FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) terms, which are supposed to govern licensing of essential technology patents.
The ruling could have broader implications for how multinational companies negotiate patent licenses and defend against litigation from firms that acquire patents solely for enforcement purposes. Apple has faced similar lawsuits globally, as regulators and courts continue to shape the boundaries of FRAND licensing in the tech industry.
