Menu

Search

  |   Business

Menu

  |   Business

Search

Audited Financial Statements Vs Reviewed Financial Statements [A Detailed Discussion]

Do you need to audit or review your business every fiscal year? Undoubtedly, it is a buzz in business everywhere. The answer is here in today’s article, with a clear comparison between audited and reviewed financial statements.

Of course, it matters your business size and yearly growth to determine the way of analysis. Both financial interpretations follow particular terms, conditions, principles, scopes, and limitations.

You must also consider the core competencies to choose the best one between audited financial statements and reviewed financial statements. Here, the way is to differentiate and decide on the best approach.

Read on more!

Definition: Audited Financial Statements Vs Reviewed Financial Statements

Here is the distinctive difference between audited financial statements and financial statements by definition.

Audited Financial Statements

Reviewed Financial Statements

An audited financial statement is the most assured report prepared by an expert independent CPA.

It represents the maximum credibility of a business entity with no more material errors.

A responsible CPA must understand management’s internal controls, risk assessments, growth plans, amounts, and disclosures to develop a credible audited financial statement.

A reviewed financial statement describes businesses with limited assurances of no more material modifications.

A CPA usually doesn’t verify management’s amounts and disclosures to develop a financial review.

Moreover, understanding a business entity’s internal controls, business risks, and prospects isn’t mandatory for a CPA to prepare a reviewed financial statement.

So, I hope you have understood the distinctive definitions of an audited or reviewed financial statement.

Purpose: Audited Financial Statements Vs Reviewed Financial Statements

An independent CPA prepares an entity’s audit or review report with specific goals of the business. Let’s check how an audited financial statement differs from a reviewed financial statement in purposes.

Audited Financial Statement

Reviewed Financial Statement

  • Obtaining reasonable assurance of financial statements.

  • Analyzing business with no material misstatements.

  • Understanding all material aspects of businesses compliant with financial reporting frameworks.

  • Growing credibility with regulators, directors, managers, investors, and other stakeholders

  • Finding strengths and weaknesses of a business entity with relevant recommendations.

  • Obtaining moderate assurance of financial statements.

  • Assessing the accounting framework adopted by business management.

  • Evaluating the overall financial presentation prepared by a business or NPO entity.

  • Understanding outside investors, trade creditors, and stakeholders compliant with AICPA financial standards

  • Analyzing a business within a short time and with less investment.

The core differences between an audited financial statement and reviewed financial statement’s purposes are accuracy and stakeholders. An audit report is more extensive, whereas a review is relatively smaller.

Scope: Audited Financial Statements Vs Reviewed Financial Statements

In financial analysis, an audited statement encompasses a larger area of study than a reviewed statement. It represents the impact of state rules, regulations, business terms, and conditions to justify the scope.

Audited Financial Statement

Reviewed Financial Statement

Area of Aspects: An audited financial statement includes all aspects of a business entity: internal controls, management, investments, sales, profits, losses, threats, and prospects.

Legal Bindings: audited statements are driven and regulated by the relevant state rules and framework. It must be in line with legal procedures.

Dependable Data: An independent and registered CPA looks for dependable data to make the audited report credible to investors, lenders, creditors, banks, and state regulators.

Reliable Records: An auditor must compare and disclose an audited financial statement with all reliable records to gain maximum accuracy. It requires rigorous tests and evaluations of financial records and management policies.

Verification: Ascertaining proper nature, timing, and the procedure is crucial to verify all transactions and recordings in an audited financial report. It must be comprehensive to ensure the authenticity and validity of the statement.

Statement Aspects: A reviewed financial statement determines the plausibility of businesses based on financial records. However, it provides limited assurance, unlike an audited report.

Legal Justifications: Unlike an audited statement, the reviewed statement is free from rigid state rules and regulations. It is enough to go with the companies’ policies and interests.

Reasonable Evidence: An accountant must go through the related documents to point out the assurance of the statement. For example, engagement letters and management representation letters.

Review Engagement: There is no scope for material modification in the reviewed financial statement. It engages generally accepted accounting principles to present the statement.

Further Authentication: A reviewed financial statement may lead to a further audit if any business entity wants it. However, it is not a common phenomenon.


So, an audited financial statement encompasses a wider study area than a reviewed financial statement. However, both play vital roles in demonstrating and presenting businesses to the targeted stakeholders.

Reporting Principles: Audited Financial Statements Vs Reviewed Financial Statements

An auditor or accountant follows core accounting principles to prepare an audited or reviewed financial statement. Find the frameworks that prove the credibility and plausibility of the financial reports.

Audited Financial Statement

Reviewed Financial Statement

  • An auditor must move with integrity and objectivity to prepare an audited financial statement.

  • A business entity will offer enough freedom to an auditor to conduct the auditing job by justifying every aspect.

  • Keeping confidentiality of sensitive business data is crucial here. None can breach business terms and conditions while auditing any business.

  • Auditing financial statement requires expert knowledge and skill. Therefore, an auditor must be adept at dealing with fundamental frameworks like GAAP or IFRS.

  • Planning is one of the core principles of a successful audit. And it must be a shared plan between an auditor and business management.

  • Documentation denotes the depth of an audited financial statement that represents the strengths and weaknesses of a company or non-profit organization.

  • Gathering audit evidence justifies the credibility and validity of an audited statement. Therefore, an auditor must gather enough evidence against internal and external data presented in the report.

  • An auditor should care about the company’s deadline to prepare the auditing statement in response to maintaining the publishing date.

  • An audited statement must be aligned with auditing rules and regulations adopted by the state authorities.

  • Finally, an audited financial statement will demonstrate the maximum assurance of a business entity with recommendations for further improvement in weak areas.

  • An accountant needs an engagement letter to develop a reviewed financial statement for a business entity.

  • A management representation letter is mandatory for reviewing a company’s or non-financial organization’s financial statement.

  • A review report must include a balance sheet and income statement of business management.

  • Reviewing the statement of cash flow and note of disclosures is also important for a reviewed financial statement.

  • An accountant will signify historical evidence and financial forecasts to prepare a reviewed financial statement for a business.

  • Confidentiality is crucial for reviewing the financial statement of an entity.

  • Data analysis must comply with the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) set by the financial accounting standard board (FASB).

  • Communication is essential with the management to avoid any misstatements.

  • No material modification is a core principle for a reviewed financial statement.

  • Accountants will deter themselves from adding personal opinions to the reviewed financial statement of a business entity.

  • No biasness is acceptable in data interpretation and representation.

  • A reviewed financial statement may turn into an audited report in some cases.


Both reporting methods must be per the generally accepted accounting principles and international financial reporting standards. Here, auditing is more sophisticated than reviewing a financial statement.

Audited Financial Statements: Benefits & Drawbacks!

Auditing is a recognized method of understanding a business through data interpretation. It authenticates a company’s financial figures to investors, lenders, banks, corporates, and public authorities.

Benefits

Drawbacks

  1. Highest level of assurance

  1. Larger in scope

  1. Verified by ever-accepted standards

  1. Highly valid and credible

  1. No more errors and misstatements

  1. Authentic financial insights

  1. Representation of risks and potentials

  1. Improvement of internal controls

  1. Promotion of confidence

  1. Expensive for small businesses

  1. Legal bindings

  1. Time-consuming

  1. Unavailable expertise

  1. Laborious


Though an audited financial statement involves some relative drawbacks, big business owners should apply the approach for accountability and credibility. It offers more accuracy than any other method.

Reviewed Financial Statements: Benefits & Drawbacks!

An accountant justifies business plausibility in the reviewed financial statement. It offers companies or financial entities extra security and confidence to deal with their yearly targets, clients, and creditors.

Benefits

Drawbacks

  • Understanding business plausibility

  • Cost-effective

  • Target-oriented

  • Investigating significant transactions

  • Less laborious

  • No legal bindings in most states

  • Limited accuracy

  • Issues of credibility

  • Not suitable for big businesses

  • Less responsive

  • Not accepted everywhere


A reviewed statement can be enough for interpreting small businesses with mid-level accountants. It saves both time and money to understand the business insights of any company or non-profit organization.

Draw Decision in Conclusion!

“Audited financial statements vs reviewed financial statements”-what should I prefer to analyze and represent my business to investors, lenders, and clients? Hope, you have already got the answer above.

However, an audited financial statement is a pretty pick for the businesses in those states where state authorities emphasize auditing over reviewing. However, it is the right choice when investment is an issue.

On the other hand, a reviewed statement is appropriate enough for the business where limited accuracy isn’t an issue. And the management wants to save money and time on performance analysis purposes.

Now, it’s entirely your choice!

This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes

  • Market Data
Close

Welcome to EconoTimes

Sign up for daily updates for the most important
stories unfolding in the global economy.