Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action 
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal 
Asian Stocks Slip as Tech Rout Deepens, Japan Steadies Ahead of Election 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations 
Gold and Silver Prices Rebound After Volatile Week Triggered by Fed Nomination 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Broadcom Inc. faces a $14.3 million penalty from South Korea's regulator over allegations of unfair business practices towards Samsung Electronics. The firm is poised to appeal in the Seoul High Court.
Expressing disappointment in a statement, the U.S. wireless chipmaker intended to appeal the case to the Seoul High Court, citing disagreement with the Fair Trade Commission's (FTC) ruling. According to the FTC, Broadcom resorted to unlawful tactics, leveraging its market dominance to force Samsung into signing a long-term agreement in 2020. These tactics included cutting off supply and technical support.
Under the agreement, Samsung Electronics was compelled by Broadcom to procure smartphone parts worth $760 million annually from 2021 to 2023. Additionally, Samsung was obligated to compensate for any purchasing amount shortfall below the agreed sum.
In its statement, Broadcom asserted its commitment to conducting business fairly and lawfully, emphasizing its significant contributions to the innovation and success of the Korean economy and its partnership with major Korean technology organizations.
Furthermore, Broadcom highlighted its collaboration with the KFTC (Korea Fair Trade Commission) staff, aiming to achieve a fair and mutually beneficial outcome for all involved parties. Despite these efforts, the FTC rejected Broadcom's proposal in June to voluntarily rectify its unfair business practices, offering a sum of 20 billion won.
The regulator reasoned that the proposed correction fell short of a suitable measure to restore the fair trade order and safeguard the interests of other industry players.
Broadcom's decision to seek an appeal signifies its willingness to challenge the ruling and defend its actions. As the legal battle unfolds in the Seoul High Court, the outcome will play a pivotal role in determining the implications for both Broadcom and Samsung.
It remains to be seen how this appeal will shape the landscape of trade practices in South Korea and the tech industry. With the fine imposed on Broadcom, the regulator has taken a firm stance against unfair business tactics, highlighting its commitment to maintaining a fair trade order.
As the legal proceedings progress, industry observers keenly await the ultimate decision of the Seoul High Court, which will have far-reaching ramifications on the business practices and competition within the Korean technology market.
Photo: Brooke Cagle/Unsplash
