Trump Claims Pardon for Tina Peters Despite No Legal Authority 
Jimmy Lai Convicted Under Hong Kong National Security Law in Landmark Case 
DOJ Sues Loudoun County School Board Over Transgender Locker Room Policy 
Silver Prices Hit Record High as Safe-Haven Demand Surges Amid U.S. Economic Uncertainty 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Pause on New Wind-Energy Permits 
Asian Stocks Slide as AI Valuation Fears and BOJ Uncertainty Weigh on Markets 
Gold and Silver Surge as Safe Haven Demand Rises on U.S. Economic Uncertainty 
Bolivia’s Ex-President Luis Arce Detained in Embezzlement Probe 
noyb Files GDPR Complaints Against TikTok, Grindr, and AppsFlyer Over Alleged Illegal Data Tracking. 
Korea Zinc Plans $6.78 Billion U.S. Smelter Investment With Government Partnership 
RBA Unlikely to Cut Interest Rates in 2026 as Inflation Pressures Persist, Says Westpac 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial 
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe 
Shell M&A Chief Exits After BP Takeover Proposal Rejected 
Chinese Robotaxi Stocks Rally as Tesla Boosts Autonomous Driving Optimism 
Broadcom Inc. faces a $14.3 million penalty from South Korea's regulator over allegations of unfair business practices towards Samsung Electronics. The firm is poised to appeal in the Seoul High Court.
Expressing disappointment in a statement, the U.S. wireless chipmaker intended to appeal the case to the Seoul High Court, citing disagreement with the Fair Trade Commission's (FTC) ruling. According to the FTC, Broadcom resorted to unlawful tactics, leveraging its market dominance to force Samsung into signing a long-term agreement in 2020. These tactics included cutting off supply and technical support.
Under the agreement, Samsung Electronics was compelled by Broadcom to procure smartphone parts worth $760 million annually from 2021 to 2023. Additionally, Samsung was obligated to compensate for any purchasing amount shortfall below the agreed sum.
In its statement, Broadcom asserted its commitment to conducting business fairly and lawfully, emphasizing its significant contributions to the innovation and success of the Korean economy and its partnership with major Korean technology organizations.
Furthermore, Broadcom highlighted its collaboration with the KFTC (Korea Fair Trade Commission) staff, aiming to achieve a fair and mutually beneficial outcome for all involved parties. Despite these efforts, the FTC rejected Broadcom's proposal in June to voluntarily rectify its unfair business practices, offering a sum of 20 billion won.
The regulator reasoned that the proposed correction fell short of a suitable measure to restore the fair trade order and safeguard the interests of other industry players.
Broadcom's decision to seek an appeal signifies its willingness to challenge the ruling and defend its actions. As the legal battle unfolds in the Seoul High Court, the outcome will play a pivotal role in determining the implications for both Broadcom and Samsung.
It remains to be seen how this appeal will shape the landscape of trade practices in South Korea and the tech industry. With the fine imposed on Broadcom, the regulator has taken a firm stance against unfair business tactics, highlighting its commitment to maintaining a fair trade order.
As the legal proceedings progress, industry observers keenly await the ultimate decision of the Seoul High Court, which will have far-reaching ramifications on the business practices and competition within the Korean technology market.
Photo: Brooke Cagle/Unsplash
