California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday vetoed a closely-watched AI safety bill, expressing concerns that the bill’s broad scope could negatively affect innovation and AI development in the state. The bill, authored by State Senator Scott Wiener, aimed to regulate high-risk AI systems but faced strong opposition from major tech companies and some federal lawmakers.
Governor’s Concerns and Industry Opposition
Newsom criticized the bill for not considering the risk levels or the sensitivity of data involved in AI applications. He argued it would impose “stringent standards” on even the most basic AI functions deployed by large systems. To address the risks of AI while fostering innovation, Newsom called on leading experts to help develop "workable guardrails" informed by scientific analysis and directed state agencies to assess potential AI-related catastrophic risks. The Chamber of Progress, a tech industry coalition, supported Newsom's veto, stating that California's tech economy benefits from competition and openness.
Proponents Push for AI Regulation
Senator Wiener contended that the legislation was necessary to implement proactive safeguards before AI systems became too advanced to control. Following the veto, he expressed concern that California would be left less protected, as companies developing powerful AI face no binding safety restrictions. He criticized the reliance on voluntary commitments from AI developers, arguing these are rarely effective in protecting the public interest.
Legislation and Infrastructure Safeguards
The proposed bill focused on generative AI, which can produce content like text, photos, and videos in response to prompts. It mandated safety testing for advanced AI models costing over $100 million to develop or requiring significant computing power and would have created a state body to oversee "Frontier Models" exceeding current AI capabilities. Newsom’s veto reflects the challenges in balancing regulation with innovation, especially as federal AI oversight legislation stalls in Congress. However, he signed a separate measure requiring risk assessments of AI threats to California's critical infrastructure, including the energy and water sectors.
Tech Industry's Mixed Response
Major tech companies like Google, OpenAI, and Meta, who are developing generative AI models, opposed the bill, citing concerns over its potential to stifle innovation. Some federal lawmakers, including Rep. Nancy Pelosi, also opposed it. However, proponents included Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk, who runs the AI firm xAI, and Amazon-backed Anthropic, which supported the bill while noting concerns about certain provisions.


Asian Markets Rebound as Tech Rally Lifts Wall Street, Investors Brace for BOJ Rate Hike
Oil Prices Climb on Venezuela Blockade, Russia Sanctions Fears, and Supply Risks
U.S. Stock Futures Slip After CPI-Fueled Rally as Markets Weigh Economic Uncertainty
Yen Near Lows as Markets Await Bank of Japan Rate Decision, Euro Slips After ECB Signals Caution
New Zealand Business Confidence Hits 30-Year High as Economic Outlook Improves
Japan Inflation Holds Firm in November as BOJ Nears Key Rate Hike Decision
Trump Orders Blockade of Sanctioned Oil Tankers, Raising Venezuela Tensions and Oil Prices
Asian Fund Managers Turn More Optimistic on Growth but Curb Equity Return Expectations: BofA Survey
Gold and Silver Surge as Safe Haven Demand Rises on U.S. Economic Uncertainty
Silver Prices Hit Record High as Safe-Haven Demand Surges Amid U.S. Economic Uncertainty
BoE Set to Cut Rates as UK Inflation Slows, but Further Easing Likely Limited
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review
Asian Stocks Edge Higher as Tech Recovers, U.S. Economic Uncertainty Caps Gains
U.S. Dollar Steadies Near October Lows as Rate Cut Expectations Keep Markets on Edge
Asian Currencies Slip as Dollar Strengthens; Indian Rupee Rebounds on Intervention Hopes
South Korea Warns Weak Won Could Push Inflation Higher in 2025
U.S. Stock Futures Edge Higher as Micron Earnings Boost AI Sentiment Ahead of CPI Data 



