California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday vetoed a closely-watched AI safety bill, expressing concerns that the bill’s broad scope could negatively affect innovation and AI development in the state. The bill, authored by State Senator Scott Wiener, aimed to regulate high-risk AI systems but faced strong opposition from major tech companies and some federal lawmakers.
Governor’s Concerns and Industry Opposition
Newsom criticized the bill for not considering the risk levels or the sensitivity of data involved in AI applications. He argued it would impose “stringent standards” on even the most basic AI functions deployed by large systems. To address the risks of AI while fostering innovation, Newsom called on leading experts to help develop "workable guardrails" informed by scientific analysis and directed state agencies to assess potential AI-related catastrophic risks. The Chamber of Progress, a tech industry coalition, supported Newsom's veto, stating that California's tech economy benefits from competition and openness.
Proponents Push for AI Regulation
Senator Wiener contended that the legislation was necessary to implement proactive safeguards before AI systems became too advanced to control. Following the veto, he expressed concern that California would be left less protected, as companies developing powerful AI face no binding safety restrictions. He criticized the reliance on voluntary commitments from AI developers, arguing these are rarely effective in protecting the public interest.
Legislation and Infrastructure Safeguards
The proposed bill focused on generative AI, which can produce content like text, photos, and videos in response to prompts. It mandated safety testing for advanced AI models costing over $100 million to develop or requiring significant computing power and would have created a state body to oversee "Frontier Models" exceeding current AI capabilities. Newsom’s veto reflects the challenges in balancing regulation with innovation, especially as federal AI oversight legislation stalls in Congress. However, he signed a separate measure requiring risk assessments of AI threats to California's critical infrastructure, including the energy and water sectors.
Tech Industry's Mixed Response
Major tech companies like Google, OpenAI, and Meta, who are developing generative AI models, opposed the bill, citing concerns over its potential to stifle innovation. Some federal lawmakers, including Rep. Nancy Pelosi, also opposed it. However, proponents included Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk, who runs the AI firm xAI, and Amazon-backed Anthropic, which supported the bill while noting concerns about certain provisions.


Asian Currencies Hold Steady Amid U.S.-Israel-Iran Tensions and BOJ Signals
Bank of Korea Nominee Shin Hyun-song Calls for Flexible Monetary Policy Amid Iran War Risks
U.S. Stock Futures Surge After WSJ Report on Trump's Iran War Exit Strategy
Asian Stocks Mixed in March 2026 Amid Iran War Fears and Tech Selloff
Oil Prices Surge to Record Monthly Highs as Middle East War Rattles Global Markets
South Korea's Exports Hit Record High in March on AI-Driven Chip Demand
Bessent: Global Oil Market Well Supplied as U.S. Eyes Hormuz Navigation Control
Oil Prices Climb as Middle East Conflict Keeps Supply Risks Elevated
WTO Ministerial Collapse Leaves Global Digital Trade Rules in Limbo
Canada's Economy Grows Modestly in January 2025, Driven by Energy and Construction
Gold Prices Rebound in Asia Amid Iran War Ceasefire Hopes
Dollar Surges to Nine-Month High as Middle East Tensions Drive Safe-Haven Demand
Goldman Sachs Sees Value in European Real Estate Stocks Despite Sharp Selloff
U.S. Trade Rep Dismisses WTO's Future Role After Failed Cameroon Summit
U.S. Stocks Surge on Iran War De-escalation Hopes
U.S. Dollar Posts Strong Monthly Gain Amid Middle East Conflict Despite Late Dip
RBC Capital: European Medtech Firms Show Minimal Middle East and Energy Risk Exposure 



