California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday vetoed a closely-watched AI safety bill, expressing concerns that the bill’s broad scope could negatively affect innovation and AI development in the state. The bill, authored by State Senator Scott Wiener, aimed to regulate high-risk AI systems but faced strong opposition from major tech companies and some federal lawmakers.
Governor’s Concerns and Industry Opposition
Newsom criticized the bill for not considering the risk levels or the sensitivity of data involved in AI applications. He argued it would impose “stringent standards” on even the most basic AI functions deployed by large systems. To address the risks of AI while fostering innovation, Newsom called on leading experts to help develop "workable guardrails" informed by scientific analysis and directed state agencies to assess potential AI-related catastrophic risks. The Chamber of Progress, a tech industry coalition, supported Newsom's veto, stating that California's tech economy benefits from competition and openness.
Proponents Push for AI Regulation
Senator Wiener contended that the legislation was necessary to implement proactive safeguards before AI systems became too advanced to control. Following the veto, he expressed concern that California would be left less protected, as companies developing powerful AI face no binding safety restrictions. He criticized the reliance on voluntary commitments from AI developers, arguing these are rarely effective in protecting the public interest.
Legislation and Infrastructure Safeguards
The proposed bill focused on generative AI, which can produce content like text, photos, and videos in response to prompts. It mandated safety testing for advanced AI models costing over $100 million to develop or requiring significant computing power and would have created a state body to oversee "Frontier Models" exceeding current AI capabilities. Newsom’s veto reflects the challenges in balancing regulation with innovation, especially as federal AI oversight legislation stalls in Congress. However, he signed a separate measure requiring risk assessments of AI threats to California's critical infrastructure, including the energy and water sectors.
Tech Industry's Mixed Response
Major tech companies like Google, OpenAI, and Meta, who are developing generative AI models, opposed the bill, citing concerns over its potential to stifle innovation. Some federal lawmakers, including Rep. Nancy Pelosi, also opposed it. However, proponents included Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk, who runs the AI firm xAI, and Amazon-backed Anthropic, which supported the bill while noting concerns about certain provisions.


Oil Prices Rally as Brent Nears $100 on U.S.-Iran Escalation
U.S. Stock Futures Steady as Oil Tops $100 Ahead of Inflation Data
China Exports Surge 25% in August as Trade Surplus Hits $119 Billion
Asian Stocks Mixed as AI Chip Rally Meets Oil Surge
Gold Prices Steady Ahead of U.S. Inflation Data and Fed Decision
ECB Rate Hike in Focus as Oil Tops $100
China Buys 1 Million Tons of U.S. Soybeans Ahead of Xi Visit
Asian Stocks Mixed as Korean Chipmakers Rally
Asian Stocks Fall as Oil Tops $100, Yields Rise
Brent Oil Tops $100 as Middle East Conflict Threatens Supply
Oil Prices Hold Near Highs as U.S.-Iran Conflict Escalates
Gold Prices Rise as Yen Rally Weakens Dollar
Japan GDP Growth Beats Forecast, Boosting BOJ Rate Hike Bets
Hormuz Shipping Slows as Iran Threats Lift Oil Risks
Iraq Seeks 6 Million Bpd OPEC+ Oil Quota
Iran Threatens Gulf Energy Assets as U.S. Tensions Escalate
US Bans Canadian Alcohol, Motorcycles as Trade War Escalates 



