The House Committee has subpoenaed significant individuals to further find out the facts of what led to the Capitol insurrection in January. A far-right militia group linked to the twice-impeached former president's former national security adviser changed its name at the last minute before its leader was subpoenaed by the panel.
The Daily Beast reported over the weekend that the far-right militia group 1st Amendment Praetorian had undergone a rebranding. The group claims to be an "Intelligence, investigations, security, and support firm" called The Shepherd Group. The group is known to have provided bodyguards to Flynn and other conspiracy theorists loyal to Donald Trump.
"Between Nov 1 and Nov 19, multiple social media accounts associated with a California-based company calling itself 'The Shepherd Group' went live as did a website hawking its 'holistic, boutique approach' to digital forensics, physical security, surveillance/counter-surveillance, and corporate intelligence,'" according to the outlet.
"But a little digging reveals that the Shepherd Group is not entirely new: rather, it appears to be a front for another militant group 1st Amendment Praetorian, previously a volunteer nonprofit that has deployed its self-described force of former armed forces and police personnel as security for right-wing leaders and events."
This follows the news that the group's leader, Robert Patrick Lewis, was already subpoenaed by the House Committee on November 23. Lewis is listed as the CEO of the Shepherd Group on LinkedIn. The militant group accompanied a pro-Trump rally at the Freedom Plaza in DC, with Lewis reportedly communicating with Flynn and "Stop the Steal" rally organizer Ali Alexander before the insurrection occurred.
The former president has also sought to derail the House Committee by suing the National Archives in an attempt to block records of his White House from being turned over to the panel. Trump's attempts have been unsuccessful so far, with the DC Appeals court ruling in favor of the House Committee and the Archives. According to Washington Post reporter Carol Leonnig, the rejection of the Appeals Court to the former president is "pretty huge."
"They do not move with this kind of alacrity, which is essential in judicial speak, a smack back in the face of the plaintiffs in this case, against the president, former president, and his lawyers. They're basically saying, you've got nothing here. And legally, they don't," said Leonnig.


Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
Iran–U.S. Nuclear Talks in Oman Face Major Hurdles Amid Rising Regional Tensions
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
Japan Election 2026: Sanae Takaichi Poised for Landslide Win Despite Record Snowfall
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
New York Legalizes Medical Aid in Dying for Terminally Ill Patients
TrumpRx.gov Highlights GLP-1 Drug Discounts but Offers Limited Savings for Most Americans
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University
U.S. Announces Additional $6 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Cuba Amid Oil Sanctions and Fuel Shortages
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Nighttime Shelling Causes Serious Damage in Russia’s Belgorod Region Near Ukraine Border
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit 



