STEVENSON, Md., Sept. 25, 2017 -- The securities litigation law firm of Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation, announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Sequans Communications S.A. (NYSE:SQNS) (“Sequans” or the “Company”) securities during the period between April 29, 2016 through July 31, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Investors who wish to become proactively involved in the litigation have until October 10, 2017 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff.
If you wish to choose counsel to represent you and the class, you must apply to be appointed lead plaintiff and be selected by the Court. The lead plaintiff will direct the litigation and participate in important decisions including whether to accept a settlement for the class in the action. The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in Sequans securities during the Class Period. Members of the class will be represented by the lead plaintiff and counsel chosen by the lead plaintiff. No class has yet been certified in the above action.
The complaint accuses the defendants of violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by virtue of the defendants’ failure to disclose during the Class Period that Sequans was improperly recognizing revenue.
According to the complaint, following an August 1, 2017 announcement that second quarter revenue was negatively affected after the Company had to take product back into their inventory from an early 2016 sale related to the tablet business, the value of Sequans shares declined significantly.
If you have suffered a loss in excess of $100,000 from investment in Sequans securities purchased on or after April 29, 2016 and held through the revelation of negative information during and/or at the end of the Class Period and would like to learn more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead plaintiff, without cost or obligation to you, please visit our website at http://www.browerpiven.com/currentsecuritiescases.html. You may also request more information by contacting Brower Piven either by email at [email protected] or by telephone at (410) 415-6616.
Attorneys at Brower Piven have extensive experience in litigating securities and other class action cases and have been advocating for the rights of shareholders since the 1980s. If you choose to retain counsel, you may retain Brower Piven without financial obligation or cost to you, or you may retain other counsel of your choice. You need take no action at this time to be a member of the class.
CONTACT: Charles J. Piven
Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation
1925 Old Valley Road
Stevenson, Maryland 21153
Telephone: 410-415-6616
[email protected]


SpaceX IPO: Retail Investors to Play Historic Role in Record-Breaking Public Offering
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs
China's AI Stocks Surge as Zhipu and MiniMax Hit Record Highs
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis
Tokyo Electric Power Attracts Major Investors Amid Billion-Dollar Restructuring Push
U.S. Automakers Push Back Against EU Rules Blocking American Trucks from European Market
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict
Samsung Electronics Posts Eightfold Profit Surge Driven by AI Chip Demand
Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses
Apple's Foldable iPhone Faces Engineering Setbacks, Mass Production Timeline at Risk
Pony.ai, Uber, and Verne Launch Europe's First Commercial Robotaxi Service in Zagreb
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Posts Strong Q3 Earnings, Announces AI-Driven Job Cuts
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy
Goldman Sachs, ANZ Cut Oil Forecasts Amid U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Hopes
Chalco Stock Surges as Q1 2025 Profit Forecast Jumps Up to 58%
Bill Ackman Eyes New Fund to Bet Against Market Complacency
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute 



