According to Supreme Court interpretation, the United States Constitution allows states to disenfranchise felons, whether they’re serving time or have been released. This is achieved by taking away their rights. For instance, with the exception of Maine and Vermont, you probably know inmates can’t vote. In most states, after being released, convicted felons need to go through a special process to reinstate their voting rights. Some states, like Mississippi, only restore voting rights to certain types of felons, and other states never restore voting rights at all.
Most people agree with banning inmates and convicted felons from voting. As Roger Clegg, president of the Center for Equal Opportunity says, “If you aren’t willing to follow the law, you can’t claim the right to make the law for everyone else.” However, this is only a glimpse of unnecessary angst directed at felons. The desire to punish inmates shows up in other areas, like the fact that they’re excluded from Medicaid unless hospitalized for 24 hours or longer. This puts the cost of inmate medical care on counties and states and makes it harder for them to access the same medical treatment as free citizens.
Many people don’t like knowing their tax dollars are paying for services received by inmates, period, even when it comes to medical care. Looking deeper into this issue, there might be a good reason taxpayers resist the idea of paying for an inmate’s medical care. Many taxpayers pay astronomical insurance premiums and still have high copays, high deductibles, and costly prescriptions. If someone can barely afford their own medical care, they’re not going approve of their tax dollars paying for a criminal’s healthcare.
Inmates don’t have options to cut medical costs
If an inmate has cancer, diabetes, asthma, or any other condition requiring ongoing treatment, it’s going to come at a significant cost. The average U.S. citizen can work around those costs in their own life by using a Canadian pharmacy to cut prescription costs, but an inmate can’t. Inmates don’t have a say in where their drugs come from, whether they’re brand-name drugs, or how much they cost. Sometimes prisons won’t administer certain drugs even when an inmate has a standing, valid prescription from a physician.
Since they’re behind bars, inmates are one of the easiest groups of people to take advantage of by denying them the same level of care a free person would be entitled to. For example, some states don’t allow inmates to treat addiction with methadone even when prescribed by a doctor. Addiction is a serious problem, and methadone has helped thousands of people recover.
The reason methadone is barred from prisons is understandable since it’s an opioid, but it’s easy to administer without allowing the inmate to take it back into the general population of the prison.
Some officials are starting to rule in favor of granting inmates more rights to medical treatment. Earlier this year, in November 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Denise Casper ruled in favor of an inmate requesting to continue his physician-prescribed methadone treatment plan while incarcerated.
Some inmates pay for their medical services
Inmates should have the same freedom as everyone else to choose treatment options that best work for them – especially since many inmates are required to pay for medical services they receive.
The Federal Bureau of Prisons allows inmates to be charged copayments for medical services they receive, including emergency treatment, hospitalization, and routine care. NPR reports at least 35 states require copayments and other fees at state prisons and county jails.
The unfortunate side effect of charging inmates copays for medical services is it can act as a deterrent to seeking necessary medical care. Inmates don’t have much money, and if they have to choose between buying soap or seeing a doctor, they’ll probably choose the soap.
About 80% of inmates don’t have much money in their commissary account, which means many of the inmates required to pay for medical care can’t afford to keep chronic conditions in check.
Rights to medical care shouldn’t be dependent on finances
It seems inmates are facing the same situation everyone else is. Access to healthcare is rough, unless you’ve got money. Hopefully the law banning inmates from receiving Medicaid will soon be repealed, as it’s starting to be scrutinized by officials in power.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.


Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools
Citi Appoints Ryan Ellis as Head of Markets Sales for Australia and New Zealand
LG Energy Solution Shares Slide After Ford Cancels EV Battery Supply Deal
ANZ New CEO Forgoes Bonus After Shareholders Reject Executive Pay Report
OpenAI Explores Massive Funding Round at $750 Billion Valuation
Instacart Stock Drops After FTC Probes AI-Based Price Discrimination Claims
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track
Union-Aligned Investors Question Amazon, Walmart and Alphabet on Trump Immigration Policies
Apple Explores India for iPhone Chip Assembly as Manufacturing Push Accelerates
Amazon in Talks to Invest $10 Billion in OpenAI as AI Firm Eyes $1 Trillion IPO Valuation
iRobot Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Rising Competition and Tariff Pressures
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Plunge on Earnings Warning Amid U.S. and China Weakness
Delta Air Lines President Glen Hauenstein to Retire, Leaving Legacy of Premium Strategy
noyb Files GDPR Complaints Against TikTok, Grindr, and AppsFlyer Over Alleged Illegal Data Tracking.
Blackstone Leads $400 Million Funding Round in Cyera at $9 Billion Valuation
Shell M&A Chief Exits After BP Takeover Proposal Rejected
Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law 



