Hanmi Semicon Shares Surge After $33 Million SpaceX Investment 
Adobe Beats Q2 2026 Estimates, Raises Full-Year Outlook as AI Revenue Surges Despite Stock Drop 
Coupang Hit With Record $409 Million Fine Over Data Breach Affecting 33 Million Users 
Meta Partners With Reliance to Launch First AI-Powered Data Center in India 
oOh!media Takeover Battle Intensifies as Bain Capital Joins Competing Bids 
Wizz Air Beats Profit Forecast as Cost Controls Offset Industry Challenges 
Changchun Targets EV Growth as China’s Auto Industry Consolidation Accelerates 
Frasers Group Launches €2 Billion Hugo Boss Takeover Offer Amid Control Speculation 
GSK Reportedly Nears $9 Billion Acquisition of Cancer Drug Developer Nuvalent 
Meta AI Strategy Faces Challenges as Zuckerberg Admits Mistakes in Internal Memo 
OpenAI Eyes Massive 10GW Ohio Data Center Campus in Potential $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Deal 
Asics Considers Onitsuka Tiger Spinoff as Luxury Sneaker Brand Expands Globally 
GM and Peak Energy Partner to Advance Sodium-Ion Battery Technology for Grid Storage 
Trump Administration Defends Anthropic AI Restrictions in Ongoing Federal Lawsuit 
SpaceX IPO Demand Surges Past $250 Billion Ahead of Historic Market Debut 
Astera Labs and Rocket Lab Surge After Nasdaq-100 Inclusion Announcement 
Sigma Healthcare Shares Slide Amid Preliminary Boots Acquisition Talks 
Exxon Mobil Corp has brought Macquarie Energy to court due to missed deliveries in the midst of a cold winter snap in the U.S. last month. The gas and oil company filed for an $11.7 billion lawsuit in the tribunal in Texas.
The billion-dollar lawsuit
As per Reuters, the issue between Exxon Mobil and Macquarie Energy began during the massive storm in February. Based on the filing, the former is suing the latter because the state declarations of emergencies and the storm prevented it from delivering its supply commitment to Macquarie, which is the U.S.'s second-largest gas marketer.
Exxon Mobil wants the court to rule that the heavy storm that swept over the central U.S. was a natural disaster. This is because Macquarie Energy has been demanding for Exxon to pay $11.7 million in damages for not being able to deliver the goods.
If the Texas court really declares that the storm was a natural disaster, his ruling will allow Exxon Mobil to break off its contract without the need to pay the penalty for the non-fulfillment of order delivery to Macquarie.
Based on the lawsuit documents, Exxon Mobil made its own declaration that the storm was a natural disaster, but Macquarie did not agree and immediately rejected this pronouncement. Despite its rejection, the Australian company that is headquartered in Texas, U.S.A., issued its own declaration later and called the incident force majeure too.
“We are confident we complied with all our obligations under terms of the contract,” Fox Business quoted Exxon spokesperson Casey Norton as saying with regards to the legal filing.
Exxon facing another lawsuit
Meanwhile, aside from this new legal battle, Exxon Mobil is also involved in another case. This time, the gas and oil conglomerate is fighting against an environmental advocacy group that accused Exxon of polluting the air.
ABC News reported that the company had been slapped with a $14.25 million fine after District Judge David Hittner of Houston sided with the group and upheld his first ruling. He initially asked for a $20 million penalty in 2017, but Exxon made an appeal to the court, and the new decision was announced this week. The oil firm is expected to file for another appeal, so the case is likely to drag once again.
