Lumentum Holdings Rides AI Wave With Order Book Filled Through 2028 
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles 
Bill Ackman Eyes New Fund to Bet Against Market Complacency 
OpenAI Addresses Security Vulnerability in macOS App Certification Process 
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs 
BHP's Incoming CEO Visits China Amid Pricing Dispute with CMRG 
SanDisk Joins Nasdaq-100, Replacing Atlassian on April 20 
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit 
TSMC Posts Strong Q1 2025 Revenue, Riding AI Chip Demand Wave 
Chinese Cars in Europe: Consumer Trust Is Shifting Fast 
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Posts Strong Q3 Earnings, Announces AI-Driven Job Cuts 
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization 
Pony.ai, Uber, and Verne Launch Europe's First Commercial Robotaxi Service in Zagreb 
Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses 
MATCH Act: How New U.S. Chip Legislation Could Freeze China's Semiconductor Ambitions 
Bank of America Identifies Top Asia-Pacific Semiconductor Stocks Poised for AI-Driven Growth 
Chalco Stock Surges as Q1 2025 Profit Forecast Jumps Up to 58% 
Exxon Mobil Corp has brought Macquarie Energy to court due to missed deliveries in the midst of a cold winter snap in the U.S. last month. The gas and oil company filed for an $11.7 billion lawsuit in the tribunal in Texas.
The billion-dollar lawsuit
As per Reuters, the issue between Exxon Mobil and Macquarie Energy began during the massive storm in February. Based on the filing, the former is suing the latter because the state declarations of emergencies and the storm prevented it from delivering its supply commitment to Macquarie, which is the U.S.'s second-largest gas marketer.
Exxon Mobil wants the court to rule that the heavy storm that swept over the central U.S. was a natural disaster. This is because Macquarie Energy has been demanding for Exxon to pay $11.7 million in damages for not being able to deliver the goods.
If the Texas court really declares that the storm was a natural disaster, his ruling will allow Exxon Mobil to break off its contract without the need to pay the penalty for the non-fulfillment of order delivery to Macquarie.
Based on the lawsuit documents, Exxon Mobil made its own declaration that the storm was a natural disaster, but Macquarie did not agree and immediately rejected this pronouncement. Despite its rejection, the Australian company that is headquartered in Texas, U.S.A., issued its own declaration later and called the incident force majeure too.
“We are confident we complied with all our obligations under terms of the contract,” Fox Business quoted Exxon spokesperson Casey Norton as saying with regards to the legal filing.
Exxon facing another lawsuit
Meanwhile, aside from this new legal battle, Exxon Mobil is also involved in another case. This time, the gas and oil conglomerate is fighting against an environmental advocacy group that accused Exxon of polluting the air.
ABC News reported that the company had been slapped with a $14.25 million fine after District Judge David Hittner of Houston sided with the group and upheld his first ruling. He initially asked for a $20 million penalty in 2017, but Exxon made an appeal to the court, and the new decision was announced this week. The oil firm is expected to file for another appeal, so the case is likely to drag once again.
