SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Exxon Mobil Corp has brought Macquarie Energy to court due to missed deliveries in the midst of a cold winter snap in the U.S. last month. The gas and oil company filed for an $11.7 billion lawsuit in the tribunal in Texas.
The billion-dollar lawsuit
As per Reuters, the issue between Exxon Mobil and Macquarie Energy began during the massive storm in February. Based on the filing, the former is suing the latter because the state declarations of emergencies and the storm prevented it from delivering its supply commitment to Macquarie, which is the U.S.'s second-largest gas marketer.
Exxon Mobil wants the court to rule that the heavy storm that swept over the central U.S. was a natural disaster. This is because Macquarie Energy has been demanding for Exxon to pay $11.7 million in damages for not being able to deliver the goods.
If the Texas court really declares that the storm was a natural disaster, his ruling will allow Exxon Mobil to break off its contract without the need to pay the penalty for the non-fulfillment of order delivery to Macquarie.
Based on the lawsuit documents, Exxon Mobil made its own declaration that the storm was a natural disaster, but Macquarie did not agree and immediately rejected this pronouncement. Despite its rejection, the Australian company that is headquartered in Texas, U.S.A., issued its own declaration later and called the incident force majeure too.
“We are confident we complied with all our obligations under terms of the contract,” Fox Business quoted Exxon spokesperson Casey Norton as saying with regards to the legal filing.
Exxon facing another lawsuit
Meanwhile, aside from this new legal battle, Exxon Mobil is also involved in another case. This time, the gas and oil conglomerate is fighting against an environmental advocacy group that accused Exxon of polluting the air.
ABC News reported that the company had been slapped with a $14.25 million fine after District Judge David Hittner of Houston sided with the group and upheld his first ruling. He initially asked for a $20 million penalty in 2017, but Exxon made an appeal to the court, and the new decision was announced this week. The oil firm is expected to file for another appeal, so the case is likely to drag once again.
