Chalco Shares Jump as Chinalco Plans Up to $300 Million Stake Increase 
Super Micro Computer Stock Jumps 20% After Record AI Orders and Margin Surge 
Domino’s Weighs Appeal After Australian Court Rules Workers Were Misled on Pay 
Wistron Opens $700M Texas AI Factory to Build Nvidia GB300 Superchips 
GE Vernova Q2 Revenue Tops Estimates as Earnings Miss, Shares Slide Despite Higher 2026 Outlook 
SpaceX Q2 Earnings on Aug. 4 Set Stage for Historic Insider Share Unlock 
OpenAI Australia Data Center Switches Cooling Strategy After Recycled Water Plan Fails 
GM Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates as General Motors Raises 2026 Profit Outlook 
Alphabet Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates as AI Spending, Google Cloud Growth Fuel Outlook 
Macquarie Names Greg Ward as CEO, Signaling Stability and Strategic Continuity 
Scandinavian Tobacco Group Sells BREAK and Moro Brands to Japan Tobacco for €176 Million 
Australia ASIC Tightens Auditor Oversight After KPMG Leak Scandal 
Samsung Cuts U.S. Consumer Electronics Jobs as Headquarters Moves to Texas 
Belimo H1 Sales Surge as AI Data Center Cooling Drives More Than Half of Growth 
IBM Q2 Earnings Miss Estimates as Software Growth Offsets Infrastructure Weakness 
Nvidia Reveals 9.3% Stake in AI Cloud Firm Nebius Following $2 Billion Investment 
Exxon Mobil Corp has brought Macquarie Energy to court due to missed deliveries in the midst of a cold winter snap in the U.S. last month. The gas and oil company filed for an $11.7 billion lawsuit in the tribunal in Texas.
The billion-dollar lawsuit
As per Reuters, the issue between Exxon Mobil and Macquarie Energy began during the massive storm in February. Based on the filing, the former is suing the latter because the state declarations of emergencies and the storm prevented it from delivering its supply commitment to Macquarie, which is the U.S.'s second-largest gas marketer.
Exxon Mobil wants the court to rule that the heavy storm that swept over the central U.S. was a natural disaster. This is because Macquarie Energy has been demanding for Exxon to pay $11.7 million in damages for not being able to deliver the goods.
If the Texas court really declares that the storm was a natural disaster, his ruling will allow Exxon Mobil to break off its contract without the need to pay the penalty for the non-fulfillment of order delivery to Macquarie.
Based on the lawsuit documents, Exxon Mobil made its own declaration that the storm was a natural disaster, but Macquarie did not agree and immediately rejected this pronouncement. Despite its rejection, the Australian company that is headquartered in Texas, U.S.A., issued its own declaration later and called the incident force majeure too.
“We are confident we complied with all our obligations under terms of the contract,” Fox Business quoted Exxon spokesperson Casey Norton as saying with regards to the legal filing.
Exxon facing another lawsuit
Meanwhile, aside from this new legal battle, Exxon Mobil is also involved in another case. This time, the gas and oil conglomerate is fighting against an environmental advocacy group that accused Exxon of polluting the air.
ABC News reported that the company had been slapped with a $14.25 million fine after District Judge David Hittner of Houston sided with the group and upheld his first ruling. He initially asked for a $20 million penalty in 2017, but Exxon made an appeal to the court, and the new decision was announced this week. The oil firm is expected to file for another appeal, so the case is likely to drag once again.
