Exxon Mobil Corp has brought Macquarie Energy to court due to missed deliveries in the midst of a cold winter snap in the U.S. last month. The gas and oil company filed for an $11.7 billion lawsuit in the tribunal in Texas.
The billion-dollar lawsuit
As per Reuters, the issue between Exxon Mobil and Macquarie Energy began during the massive storm in February. Based on the filing, the former is suing the latter because the state declarations of emergencies and the storm prevented it from delivering its supply commitment to Macquarie, which is the U.S.'s second-largest gas marketer.
Exxon Mobil wants the court to rule that the heavy storm that swept over the central U.S. was a natural disaster. This is because Macquarie Energy has been demanding for Exxon to pay $11.7 million in damages for not being able to deliver the goods.
If the Texas court really declares that the storm was a natural disaster, his ruling will allow Exxon Mobil to break off its contract without the need to pay the penalty for the non-fulfillment of order delivery to Macquarie.
Based on the lawsuit documents, Exxon Mobil made its own declaration that the storm was a natural disaster, but Macquarie did not agree and immediately rejected this pronouncement. Despite its rejection, the Australian company that is headquartered in Texas, U.S.A., issued its own declaration later and called the incident force majeure too.
“We are confident we complied with all our obligations under terms of the contract,” Fox Business quoted Exxon spokesperson Casey Norton as saying with regards to the legal filing.
Exxon facing another lawsuit
Meanwhile, aside from this new legal battle, Exxon Mobil is also involved in another case. This time, the gas and oil conglomerate is fighting against an environmental advocacy group that accused Exxon of polluting the air.
ABC News reported that the company had been slapped with a $14.25 million fine after District Judge David Hittner of Houston sided with the group and upheld his first ruling. He initially asked for a $20 million penalty in 2017, but Exxon made an appeal to the court, and the new decision was announced this week. The oil firm is expected to file for another appeal, so the case is likely to drag once again.


MATCH Act: How New U.S. Chip Legislation Could Freeze China's Semiconductor Ambitions
SanDisk Joins Nasdaq-100, Replacing Atlassian on April 20
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Posts Strong Q3 Earnings, Announces AI-Driven Job Cuts
BHP's Incoming CEO Visits China Amid Pricing Dispute with CMRG
Chinese Brands Are Taking Over Brazil — And It's Just Getting Started
Goldman Sachs, ANZ Cut Oil Forecasts Amid U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Hopes
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy
Lumentum Holdings Rides AI Wave With Order Book Filled Through 2028
Bill Ackman Eyes New Fund to Bet Against Market Complacency
San Francisco Suspect Arrested After Molotov Cocktail Attack on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's Home
Chinese Cars in Europe: Consumer Trust Is Shifting Fast
Disney Plans to Cut 1,000 Jobs Amid Ongoing Restructuring Efforts
FedEx Pilots and Union Reach Tentative Agreement on 40% Pay Increase
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis
Bank of America Identifies Top Asia-Pacific Semiconductor Stocks Poised for AI-Driven Growth
Rio Tinto's California Boron Assets Attract Over a Dozen Bidders, Valued at Up to $2 Billion
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict 



