Generative AI tools such as Midjourney, Stable Diffusion and DALL-E 2 have astounded us with their ability to produce remarkable images in a matter of seconds.
Despite their achievements, however, there remains a puzzling disparity between what AI image generators can produce and what we can. For instance, these tools often won’t deliver satisfactory results for seemingly simple tasks such as counting objects and producing accurate text.
If generative AI has reached such unprecedented heights in creative expression, why does it struggle with tasks even a primary school student could complete?
Exploring the underlying reasons helps sheds light on the complex numerical nature of AI, and the nuance of its capabilities.
AI’s limitations with writing
Humans can easily recognise text symbols (such as letters, numbers and characters) written in various different fonts and handwriting. We can also produce text in different contexts, and understand how context can change meaning.
Current AI image generators lack this inherent understanding. They have no true comprehension of what any text symbols mean. These generators are built on artificial neural networks trained on massive amounts of image data, from which they “learn” associations and make predictions.
Combinations of shapes in the training images are associated with various entities. For example, two inward-facing lines that meet might represent the tip of a pencil, or the roof of a house.
But when it comes to text and quantities, the associations must be incredibly accurate, since even minor imperfections are noticeable. Our brains can overlook slight deviations in a pencil’s tip, or a roof – but not as much when it comes to how a word is written, or the number of fingers on a hand.
As far as text-to-image models are concerned, text symbols are just combinations of lines and shapes. Since text comes in so many different styles – and since letters and numbers are used in seemingly endless arrangements – the model often won’t learn how to effectively reproduce text.
AI-generated image produced in response to the prompt ‘KFC logo’. Imagine AI
The main reason for this is insufficient training data. AI image generators require much more training data to accurately represent text and quantities than they do for other tasks.
The tragedy of AI hands
Issues also arise when dealing with smaller objects that require intricate details, such as hands.
Two AI-generated images produced in response to the prompt ‘young girl holding up ten fingers, realistic’. Shutterstock AI
In training images, hands are often small, holding objects, or partially obscured by other elements. It becomes challenging for AI to associate the term “hand” with the exact representation of a human hand with five fingers.
Consequently, AI-generated hands often look misshapen, have additional or fewer fingers, or have hands partially covered by objects such as sleeves or purses.
We see a similar issue when it comes to quantities. AI models lack a clear understanding of quantities, such as the abstract concept of “four”.
As such, an image generator may respond to a prompt for “four apples” by drawing on learning from myriad images featuring many quantities of apples – and return an output with the incorrect amount.
In other words, the huge diversity of associations within the training data impacts the accuracy of quantities in outputs.
Three AI-generated images produced in response to the prompt ‘5 soda cans on a table’. Shutterstock AI
Will AI ever be able to write and count?
It’s important to remember text-to-image and text-to-video conversion is a relatively new concept in AI. Current generative platforms are “low-resolution” versions of what we can expect in the future.
With advancements being made in training processes and AI technology, future AI image generators will likely be much more capable of producing accurate visualisations.
It’s also worth noting most publicly accessible AI platforms don’t offer the highest level of capability. Generating accurate text and quantities demands highly optimised and tailored networks, so paid subscriptions to more advanced platforms will likely deliver better results.


Texas App Store Age Verification Law Blocked by Federal Judge in First Amendment Ruling
ByteDance Plans Massive AI Investment in 2026 to Close Gap With U.S. Tech Giants
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track
Meta Acquires AI Startup Manus to Expand Advanced AI Capabilities Across Platforms
OpenAI Explores Massive Funding Round at $750 Billion Valuation
Moore Threads Unveils New GPUs, Fuels Optimism Around China’s AI Chip Ambitions
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy
Neuralink Plans Automated Brain Implant Surgeries and Mass Production by 2026
Samsung Electronics Secures Annual U.S. Licence for China Chip Equipment Imports in 2026
Trump Administration Lifts Sanctions on Three Intellexa-Linked Executives
John Carreyrou Sues Major AI Firms Over Alleged Copyrighted Book Use in AI Training
China’s LandSpace Takes Aim at SpaceX With Reusable Rocket Ambitions
Applied Digital Stock Rises on AI Cloud Spinoff Plan and ChronoScale Launch
Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law
Elon Musk’s xAI Expands Supercomputer Infrastructure With Third Data Center to Boost AI Training Power
Italy Fines Apple €98.6 Million Over App Store Dominance
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand 






