Glastonbury is as popular than ever, but complaints about the lineup reveal its generational challenge 
What’s the difference between baking powder and baking soda? It’s subtle, but significant 
6 simple questions to tell if a ‘finfluencer’ is more flash than cash 
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding 
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal 
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
Youth are charting new freshwater futures by learning from the water on the water 
Stuck in a creativity slump at work? Here are some surprising ways to get your spark back 
The ghost of Robodebt – Federal Court rules billions of dollars in welfare debts must be recalculated 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
An Australian court has ruled that pop superstar Katy Perry infringed the trademark of a Sydney-based fashion designer, Katie Taylor, who has been selling her products locally under the "Katie Perry" label
Katie Taylor, whose birth name is Katie Perry, alleged in her 2019 lawsuit that the singer ignored the trademark and sold Katy Perry clothing to Australian customers in 2014 and 2018 during her concert tours in the country through retailers and websites.
According to Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic's ruling, Katy Perry's company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by promoting the singer's products through posts on social media.
Damages are due to decided at a later date.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the Katie Perry trademark.
Taylor called the verdict a "David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move, Taylor said.
