Oil Prices Recover Slightly as U.S. Crude Inventories Fall, But Iran Deal Caps Gains 
US Appeals Court Allows Trump Military Enlistment Ban on Transgender Recruits, Protects Current Service Members 
What’s the difference between baking powder and baking soda? It’s subtle, but significant 
Asian Stocks Advance as Nikkei Nears Record High Ahead of Fed Decision 
Britain has almost 1 million young people not in work or education – here’s what evidence shows can change that 
Jio IPO Filing Nears as Reliance Targets $4 Billion Market Debut 
Myanmar Economic Outlook Hit by Fuel Price Shock as World Bank Cuts Growth Forecast 
Gold Prices Rebound on U.S.-Iran Peace Deal Optimism Despite Fed Rate Hike Signals 
Why have so few atrocities ever been recognised as genocide? 
US Appeals Court Keeps Trump’s 10% Global Tariff in Effect During Ongoing Legal Battle 
Want to cut your energy bills? Here’s how five experts are doing it 
SpaceX Stock Gets $175 Target as Analysts See Massive Growth Ahead 
Saudi Aramco Explores Sulphur Business Stake Sale to Raise Billions 
Trump Administration Closes Delta Air Lines Investigation Over 2024 CrowdStrike Outage 
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder 
DOJ Pushes to Resume Trump White House Ballroom Project After Security Incident 
Yes, government influences wages – but not just in the way you might think 
An Australian court has ruled that pop superstar Katy Perry infringed the trademark of a Sydney-based fashion designer, Katie Taylor, who has been selling her products locally under the "Katie Perry" label
Katie Taylor, whose birth name is Katie Perry, alleged in her 2019 lawsuit that the singer ignored the trademark and sold Katy Perry clothing to Australian customers in 2014 and 2018 during her concert tours in the country through retailers and websites.
According to Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic's ruling, Katy Perry's company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by promoting the singer's products through posts on social media.
Damages are due to decided at a later date.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the Katie Perry trademark.
Taylor called the verdict a "David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move, Taylor said.
