Anthropic Sues Pentagon Over AI Blacklist, Citing Free Speech Violations 
Cybersecurity Stocks Tumble After Anthropic's Claude Mythos AI Leak Sparks Market Fears 
Glastonbury is as popular than ever, but complaints about the lineup reveal its generational challenge 
Why a ‘rip-off’ degree might be worth the money after all – research study 
Brazil Meat Exports Weather Iran War Disruptions With Rerouted Shipments 
Heritage, desire and diplomacy: why China still values scotch whisky 
xAI Faces Federal Lawsuit Over Grok AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material 
Oil Prices Slip as Trump Extends Iran Ceasefire Deadline Amid Ongoing War Fears 
Asia Markets Tumble as Gulf Conflict Drives Oil Prices to Historic Highs 
ICE Arrests Colombian Journalist in Tennessee, Trump Administration Says She Will Receive Due Process 
Why have so few atrocities ever been recognised as genocide? 
What’s the difference between baking powder and baking soda? It’s subtle, but significant 
Luxury Car Sales in the Middle East Take a Hit Amid Iran War 
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder 
The pandemic is still disrupting young people’s careers 
Disaster or digital spectacle? The dangers of using floods to create social media content 
Lynas Rare Earths Signs Vietnam Deal with LS Eco Energy to Boost Magnet Metal Production 
An Australian court has ruled that pop superstar Katy Perry infringed the trademark of a Sydney-based fashion designer, Katie Taylor, who has been selling her products locally under the "Katie Perry" label
Katie Taylor, whose birth name is Katie Perry, alleged in her 2019 lawsuit that the singer ignored the trademark and sold Katy Perry clothing to Australian customers in 2014 and 2018 during her concert tours in the country through retailers and websites.
According to Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic's ruling, Katy Perry's company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by promoting the singer's products through posts on social media.
Damages are due to decided at a later date.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the Katie Perry trademark.
Taylor called the verdict a "David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move, Taylor said.
