Heritage, desire and diplomacy: why China still values scotch whisky 
25 Democratic-Led States Sue Trump Administration Over New Global Tariffs 
Asian Currencies Steady as Dollar Holds Firm After U.S. Inflation Data 
Pandora Shares Rise as Q2 Results Beat Forecasts, 2026 Outlook Raised 
UK Economy Posts Surprise June Growth as World Cup and Hot Weather Lift Activity 
Gold Prices Retreat From Two-Month High as Softer Inflation Eases Fed Rate Hike Bets 
Britain has almost 1 million young people not in work or education – here’s what evidence shows can change that 
Time to buy local: war fuel price shocks reveal the folly of a long food supply chain 
Aviva First-Half Operating Profit Jumps 24% as Direct Line Deal Boosts Growth 
Goldman Sachs Eyes Investors for Nvidia’s $500 Billion AI Financing Plan 
Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages 
Stuck in a creativity slump at work? Here are some surprising ways to get your spark back 
Gold Prices Slip From 10-Week High as Fed and Hormuz Risks Shape Outlook 
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief 
Bashar al-Assad Sentenced to Death by Syrian Court 
Office design isn’t keeping up with post-COVID work styles - here’s what workers really want 
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Bid to Reinstate $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee 
Add as a preferred source on Google
An Australian court has ruled that pop superstar Katy Perry infringed the trademark of a Sydney-based fashion designer, Katie Taylor, who has been selling her products locally under the "Katie Perry" label
Katie Taylor, whose birth name is Katie Perry, alleged in her 2019 lawsuit that the singer ignored the trademark and sold Katy Perry clothing to Australian customers in 2014 and 2018 during her concert tours in the country through retailers and websites.
According to Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic's ruling, Katy Perry's company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by promoting the singer's products through posts on social media.
Damages are due to decided at a later date.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the Katie Perry trademark.
Taylor called the verdict a "David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move, Taylor said.
