US companies that will cover travel costs for employees getting abortions could be exposed to criminal liability, according to legal experts.
Last Friday, the US Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion and upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks.
Amazon.com Inc, Apple Inc, Lyft Inc, Microsoft Corp, and JPMorgan Chase & Co were among companies that announced plans to provide those benefits through their health insurance plans.
Conde Nast, Walt Disney Co, Cigna Corp, Paypal Holdings Inc, Alaska Airlines Inc, and Dick's Sporting Goods Inc announced reimbursement policies.
If businesses adopt policies that support employees getting abortions, they will have to navigate the patchwork of state laws and risk angering anti-abortion organizations and Republican-led states.
Texas state legislators have already threatened legal action against Lyft and Citigroup Inc, both of which had previously announced travel reimbursement policies.
The lawmakers also presented a number of abortion-related bills, one of which would prevent businesses from operating in Texas if they pay for women living there to have abortions elsewhere.
Companies will probably soon be sued by states or anti-abortion activists who claim that payments related to abortions violate state laws prohibiting the facilitation or aiding and abetting of abortions, says University of Illinois law professor and expert on healthcare law, Robin Fretwell Wilson.
States are not allowed to enact regulations prohibiting to employer-sponsored health plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). That language has been interpreted by courts for decades to preclude state regulations that specify what health plans must and must not cover.
Any company sued over an abortion travel reimbursement requirement will likely cite ERISA as a defense, according to Katy Johnson, senior counsel for health policy at the American Benefits Council, a trade group.
However, fully-insured health plans, in which employers purchase coverage through a commercial insurer, are regulated by state law and not ERISA.
Furthermore, ERISA does not preclude states from enforcing criminal laws, such as the laws in a number of states that make it illegal to aid and abet abortions.


Palantir Stock Jumps After Strong Q4 Earnings Beat and Upbeat 2026 Revenue Forecast
Japan’s Agricultural, Forestry and Fishery Exports Hit Record High in 2025 Despite Tariffs
Trump Administration Appeals Judge’s Order Limiting ICE Tactics in Minneapolis
Nvidia Confirms Major OpenAI Investment Amid AI Funding Race
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Starmer’s China Visit Highlights Western Balancing Act Amid U.S.-China Rivalry
SpaceX Updates Starlink Privacy Policy to Allow AI Training as xAI Merger Talks and IPO Loom
JPMorgan Lifts Gold Price Forecast to $6,300 by End-2026 on Strong Central Bank and Investor Demand
SpaceX Reports $8 Billion Profit as IPO Plans and Starlink Growth Fuel Valuation Buzz
Saks Global to End Saks on Amazon Partnership Amid Bankruptcy Restructuring
Sanofi Reports Positive Late-Stage Results for Amlitelimab in Eczema Treatment
Hyundai Motor Lets Russia Plant Buyback Option Expire Amid Ongoing Ukraine War
Trump Threatens Aircraft Tariffs as U.S.-Canada Jet Certification Dispute Escalates
Philippines Manufacturing PMI Hits Nine-Month High Despite Weak Confidence Outlook
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Novo Nordisk Stock Surges After FDA Approves Wegovy Pill for Weight Loss 



