US companies that will cover travel costs for employees getting abortions could be exposed to criminal liability, according to legal experts.
Last Friday, the US Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion and upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks.
Amazon.com Inc, Apple Inc, Lyft Inc, Microsoft Corp, and JPMorgan Chase & Co were among companies that announced plans to provide those benefits through their health insurance plans.
Conde Nast, Walt Disney Co, Cigna Corp, Paypal Holdings Inc, Alaska Airlines Inc, and Dick's Sporting Goods Inc announced reimbursement policies.
If businesses adopt policies that support employees getting abortions, they will have to navigate the patchwork of state laws and risk angering anti-abortion organizations and Republican-led states.
Texas state legislators have already threatened legal action against Lyft and Citigroup Inc, both of which had previously announced travel reimbursement policies.
The lawmakers also presented a number of abortion-related bills, one of which would prevent businesses from operating in Texas if they pay for women living there to have abortions elsewhere.
Companies will probably soon be sued by states or anti-abortion activists who claim that payments related to abortions violate state laws prohibiting the facilitation or aiding and abetting of abortions, says University of Illinois law professor and expert on healthcare law, Robin Fretwell Wilson.
States are not allowed to enact regulations prohibiting to employer-sponsored health plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). That language has been interpreted by courts for decades to preclude state regulations that specify what health plans must and must not cover.
Any company sued over an abortion travel reimbursement requirement will likely cite ERISA as a defense, according to Katy Johnson, senior counsel for health policy at the American Benefits Council, a trade group.
However, fully-insured health plans, in which employers purchase coverage through a commercial insurer, are regulated by state law and not ERISA.
Furthermore, ERISA does not preclude states from enforcing criminal laws, such as the laws in a number of states that make it illegal to aid and abet abortions.


Why Global Web3 Projects Can't Afford to Skip South Korea: TokenPost Unveils Data-Driven Entry Solutions
Foreign Investors Drive Surge in Japanese Stocks Amid AI Rally and Improved Risk Sentiment
Is dark chocolate healthier than milk chocolate? 2 dietitians explain
Justice Jackson Slams Supreme Court's Growing Use of Shadow Docket
Bank of Japan Signals Potential Rate Hike as Inflation Risks Rise Amid Energy Shock
Florida Investigates OpenAI and ChatGPT Over Alleged Role in FSU Shooting
FDA Biologics Chief Vinay Prasad to Leave Agency in April Amid Policy Disputes
Argentina Court Upholds Cristina Kirchner Asset Seizure in Corruption Case
FDA Warns Novo Nordisk Over Misleading Ozempic Ad Claims
Novartis’ Vanrafia Shows Strong Phase 3 Results in IgA Nephropathy, Paving Way for Full Approval
Mercedes-Benz Faces Rising Competition in China but Rejects Price War Strategy
SK Hynix Reports Record Q1 Profit Surge Driven by AI Memory Chip Demand
U.S. Disrupts Russian Military Hackers' Global DNS Hijacking Network
RFK Jr. Expands CDC Vaccine Advisory Panel's Scope Amid Legal Battles
Asian Markets Mixed as Oil Prices Rise Amid Middle East Tensions and Ceasefire Uncertainty
Canadian Dollar Outlook: Resilient Performance Driven by Oil Prices and Market Dynamics 



