U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson sparked controversy Tuesday by stating that Congress holds constitutional power to eliminate entire federal district courts. His remarks followed growing frustration among Republicans over federal judges blocking policies supported by President Donald Trump.
Johnson criticized the increasing use of nationwide injunctions by judges, calling it a “dangerous trend” that undermines the separation of powers. He argued that judges halting executive actions approved by voters overstep their authority. Johnson noted the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing next week to address what he described as judicial abuses and promote legislation restricting district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions.
“We do have authority over the federal courts,” Johnson said. “We can eliminate an entire district court. We have power over funding and structure.” He later clarified the statement was not a threat, but a reminder of congressional authority over the judiciary.
Nationwide injunctions have been used by judges from both parties in recent years to pause federal policies. However, Johnson’s proposed legislation would likely face significant resistance in the Democratic-controlled Senate.
The Speaker’s comments came amid calls from far-right Republicans to impeach six federal judges, including U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who blocked the deportation of Venezuelan migrants. Johnson deferred to the Judiciary Committee on the impeachment resolutions, which have little chance of advancing in the Senate.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare statement rebuking the impeachment calls, emphasizing that judicial decisions should be appealed, not punished.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer condemned Johnson’s remarks, calling the notion of defunding courts “outrageous.”
As judicial independence becomes a flashpoint in U.S. politics, Johnson’s remarks underscore a growing partisan battle over the courts and their role in shaping national policy.


Is Netanyahu’s star waning in Washington? His latest meeting with Trump suggests it may be
HRW Accuses Russia’s Africa Corps of Deadly Airstrike on Mali Civilians
Trump, Netanyahu Discuss Iran Nuclear Options as Tensions Escalate
Ukraine F-16 Fighter Jet Crashes During Mission, Pilot Ejects Safely
U.S. Launches Air Strikes on Iran After Alleged Missile Attack on American Forces
Spain Deploys Troops as Ceuta Faces Major Migrant Surge From Morocco
Trump Weighs Iran Strikes as U.S. Embassies Issue Emergency Security Alerts
Iran Warns of Retaliation as Trump Threatens New Strikes, Oil Risks Intensify
Oman Proposes Strait of Hormuz Plan as U.S. Rejects Iran Shipping Fee Idea
US Embassies Urge Americans to Leave Middle East as Iran Tensions Escalate
Ukraine Protests Grow Over Zelensky’s Dismissal of Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Freelancer Over North Korea Military Report
North Korea Warns U.S. Forces Japan Expansion Raises Korea Conflict Risk
White House: No Weaponized Drones Seized at FIFA World Cup Venues Despite 700 Recoveries
South Korea Reviews Border Drone Incident After Troops Mistake U.S. Aircraft for Potential Threat
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts
Brazil Supreme Court Approves Probe Into Lula’s Son Over Health Ministry Lobbying Claims 



