Asian Currencies Trade Sideways as Dollar Weakens Ahead of Key U.S. Data 
Asian Fund Managers Turn More Optimistic on Growth but Curb Equity Return Expectations: BofA Survey 
U.S. House Advances GOP Healthcare Bill as ACA Subsidies Near Expiration 
Singapore Growth Outlook Brightens for 2025 as Economists Flag AI and Geopolitical Risks 
Oil Prices Steady in Asia but Headed for Weekly Loss on Supply Glut Concerns 
NSW to Recall Parliament for Urgent Gun and Protest Law Reforms After Bondi Beach Shooting 
Yen Near Lows as Markets Await Bank of Japan Rate Decision, Euro Slips After ECB Signals Caution 
Trump Orders Blockade of Sanctioned Oil Tankers, Raising Venezuela Tensions and Oil Prices 
U.S. Initiates $11.1 Billion Arms Sale to Taiwan Amid Rising China Tensions 
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy 
Jared Isaacman Confirmed as NASA Administrator, Becomes 15th Leader of U.S. Space Agency 
U.S.-Russia Talks in Miami Raise Hopes for Potential Ukraine War Deal 
Bank of Korea Downplays Liquidity’s Role in Weak Won and Housing Price Surge 
Gold and Silver Prices Dip as Markets Await Key U.S. Economic Data 
New Zealand Business Confidence Hits 30-Year High as Economic Outlook Improves 
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review 
Dan Bongino to Step Down as FBI Deputy Director After Brief, Controversial Tenure 
NATO defense ministers are meeting in Brussels to address U.S. President Donald Trump’s call for member states to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP, up from the current 2% target. The discussions come ahead of the NATO summit in The Hague on June 24–25, where the alliance is expected to unveil a new defense investment plan.
Trump’s demand for increased military funding is seen by many allies as a condition for maintaining U.S. support for European security. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte acknowledged the urgency, stating, “We have to go further and we have to go faster.”
In response, Rutte has proposed a compromise: 3.5% of GDP toward defense and an additional 1.5% for broader security spending, including areas like cybersecurity and infrastructure. However, this suggestion has sparked debate among members over feasibility and timelines.
Germany’s Defence Minister Boris Pistorius emphasized the need for a "realistic compromise" given national budget constraints and industrial capacity. Meanwhile, eastern European countries, including Lithuania, argue that the proposed 2032 deadline to reach 5% is too distant. Lithuania’s Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene is pushing for a 2030 target instead.
Further complicating talks is disagreement over what qualifies as "defense-related" expenditure. NATO diplomats are working to define criteria that balance precision with flexibility for national differences.
U.S. ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, warned that time is running out to finalize the deal. The final investment framework is likely to remain under negotiation until just before the summit.
As the alliance navigates these challenges, the outcome will signal NATO’s ability to adapt to shifting political demands while preserving unity and credibility on global security.
