BHP Workers Approve New Labour Agreement at WA Iron Ore Operations 
New Zealand Consumer Confidence Rises in June as Inflation Expectations Ease 
OpenAI Proposes 5% U.S. Government Stake Amid AI Policy Talks 
Apple Expands iPhone Lineup, Boosts Foldable iPhone Production Plans Through 2027 
ShareChat Eyes 2027 IPO After Reaching Operational Profitability, Report Says 
Norway Offshore Oil Workers Reach Wage Deal, Averting Strike 
South Korean Stocks Tumble as AI Chip Selloff Hits Asian Markets 
Australia Trade Balance Swings to Surprise Deficit as Imports Outpace Exports in May 
SK Holdings, KKR Launch $1.3B Renewable Energy Venture in South Korea 
Mary Daly Says AI Uncertainty Clouds Fed Rate Outlook Despite Restrictive Policy 
Meta CEO Zuckerberg Says AI Agent Development Has Slowed Despite Massive AI Investment 
Chinese Copper Foil Maker Londian Files U.S. IPO as EV Battery Demand Grows 
South Korea Warns Won Is Undervalued, Boosts FX Coordination With Japan 
Turkey Vehicle Sales Fall 11.4% in June as Auto Market Weakens 
US Dollar Rises as Fed Rate Outlook Stays Hawkish, Euro Slips and Yen Near 40-Year Low 
Lockheed Martin Emerges as Frontrunner to Acquire Ultra Maritime in $3.5 Billion Defense Deal 
Kioxia Bets on AI Memory Boom With Next-Gen NAND Production in Japan 
Procter & Gamble recently signed a deal with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and it is for a partnership for humanitarian works. Based on the reports, they will be working with the company “to build more compassionate communities.”
The Daily Mail reported that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex previously announced that their Archwell Foundation signed a partnership deal with Procter & Gamble, a company that also manufactures cosmetic products including skin whitening creams and the likes.
The deal between P&G and the Sussexes
Then again, the team-up between the American multinational consumer goods firm headquartered in Ohio was not well-received. Despite the good intention of the partnership, it became a controversial topic as people started pointing out that Procter & Gamble makes “racist” skin whitening products and yet, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle still chose to have a deal with them.
It was reported that their campaigns were organized to stop P&G from manufacturing and selling such products because these only fuels the “toxic belief” that a person's worth is measured by his or her skin color. Often, it was assumed that light skin is better than dark skin tone.
Thus, the campaigners want P&G and other companies to stop selling skin-lightening creams, lotions and more. Now, the reason why people are calling for Prince Harry and Meghan to get rid of their deal with the company was because the latter talks about issues of racism but they are working with a company that produces such “racist” cosmetic products.
People slammed Prince Harry and Meghan for the deal with P&G
A former executive at P&G, Alex Malouf, said that the royals will come under pressure to say if they support the sale of skin whitening creams. “Meghan has talked a lot about the issue of race and racism, so this does stick out like a sore thumb,' he added.
Finally, Fox Business further reported that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are facing a backlash as the public was furious as they can’t scrap the deal with Procter & Gamble. They said that they have always said they are advocates of anti-racism but still landed a deal with the maker of skin-lightening creams. The couple has yet to respond to the criticisms.
