Apple Expands iPhone Lineup, Boosts Foldable iPhone Production Plans Through 2027 
DOJ Seeks Dismissal of Fraud Charges Against Gautam Adani in U.S. Court 
Anthropic Tightens AI Access Controls After Reports of China-Based Workarounds 
Meta Cloud Ambitions Could Challenge AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, Says Morgan Stanley 
Norway Offshore Oil Workers Reach Wage Deal, Averting Strike 
easyJet Agrees in Principle to £5.23 Billion Castlelake Takeover Offer 
Kioxia Bets on AI Memory Boom With Next-Gen NAND Production in Japan 
Chinese Copper Foil Maker Londian Files U.S. IPO as EV Battery Demand Grows 
Lockheed Martin Emerges as Frontrunner to Acquire Ultra Maritime in $3.5 Billion Defense Deal 
Sodexo Raises 2026 Revenue Outlook After Strong Q3 Sales Beat 
Tesla Q2 Deliveries Lift Chinese Auto Suppliers as EV Demand Improves 
AI Memory Chip Shortage Likely to Persist Despite Korea Investment Boom, Nomura Says 
BHP Workers Approve New Labour Agreement at WA Iron Ore Operations 
Switch Seeks $2 Billion Funding at Nearly $50 Billion Valuation Ahead of Potential IPO 
Citi Raises TSMC Price Target as AI Chip Demand Strengthens Growth Outlook 
Samsung to Invest $90 Billion in South Korea to Expand AI Chip, Display, and Battery Production 
Super Micro Employees Detained in Taiwan AI Server Export Investigation 
South Korea will present its objections this month to a ruling by the High Court of Justice in Britain in the failed takeover of Daewoo Electronics, granting Iran's Dayyani family an interim charging order against Dana Petroleum shares.
Dana Petroleum is a wholly-owned subsidiary of state-run Korea National Oil Corp.
A Financial Services Commission said that the South Korean government has been in talks with the Dayyani family over how to satisfy the 73 billion won obligation.
The dispute arose after South Korea's state-run Korea Asset Management Corp. (KAMCO) terminated a deal after picking Entekhab Industrial Group as the preferred bidder for a controlling stake in Daewoo Electronics, citing funding uncertainties.
Entekhab, represented by its Singapore-based firm D&A, had already paid 57.8 billion won, or 10 percent of the total value, after signing the deal.
The Dayyani family demanded that KAMCO return the paid amount.
However, the creditors of Daewoo Electronics declined, blaming D&A for the botched deal.
The Dayyani family then sought an investor-state dispute settlement against South Korea to recover the 57.8 billion-won payment and filed the complaint with the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), demanding 93.5 billion won.
In 2018, the ICSID ordered South Korea to pay the Iranian family 73 billion won as compensation, finding the creditors of Daewoo Electronics as responsible for the deal's breakdown.
South Korea sought to nullify the international ruling in the British court, which rules against it in December.
It was the first time for South Korea to get an unfavorable decision against a foreign firm in an Investor-State Dispute Settlement, a process where investors sue countries for unfair practices.
