SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate 
WILMINGTON, Del., March 22, 2016 -- Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:
- Do you, or did you, own shares of Performance Sports Group Ltd. (NYSE:PSG)?
- Did you purchase your shares between August 27, 2015 and March 7, 2016, inclusive?
- Did you lose money in your investment?
Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. announces that a complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Performance Sports Group Ltd. (“PSG” or the “Company”) (NYSE:PSG) between August 27, 2015 and March 7, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”).
If you purchased shares of PSG during the Class Period, and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120, Wilmington, DE 19803 at (888) 969-4242; by e-mail to [email protected]; or at: http://rigrodskylong.com/investigations/performance-sports-group-ltd-psg.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and omitted materially adverse facts, about the Company’s business, operations and prospects. As a result of defendants’ alleged false and misleading statements, the Company’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.
According to the Complaint, on March 8, 2016, before the market opened, the Company issued a press release revising guidance for the year ending May 31, 2016. According to the release, The Company reduced its fiscal year 2016 Adjusted EPS guidance by approximately $0.55 per diluted share to approximately $0.12 to $0.14 per diluted share as compared to its prior publication of guidance ($0.66 to $0.69 per diluted share), primarily as a result of the following three factors: (i) a write down of the receivable balance from a U.S. national sporting goods retailer that has filed under chapter 11 and the related anticipated loss of sales from this retailer ($0.09 per share); (ii) an anticipated reduction in sales, particularly due to weakness in the baseball/softball market ($0.31 per share); and (iii) additional bad debt reserves primarily for certain U.S. hockey customers and the related anticipated loss of sales from such customers ($0.19 per share).
On this news, shares of PSG plummeted over 66%, closing at $2.91 per share on March 8, 2016, on heavy trading volume.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 17, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Any member of the proposed class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
CONTACT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire Peter Allocco (888) 969-4242 (516) 683-3516 Fax: (302) 654-7530 [email protected] http://www.rigrodskylong.com
