NHS shakeup: if it sounds like we’ve been here before, it’s because we have 
CTOC Goes Live on Bitget Wallet Trading, Expanding Global Access to AI-Powered Healthcare Data Ecosystem 
Salesforce Q1 FY2027 Earnings Beat Expectations Despite Soft Q2 Revenue Outlook 
Puerto Rico Economic Development Chief Resigns Amid Government Shake-Up 
PDG Explores $1 Billion Sale of China Data Center Assets 
Elon Musk Explores Possible Tesla-SpaceX Merger Amid Growing AI Investments 
Samsung to Invest $1.5 Billion in Vietnam Semiconductor Testing Plant by 2027 
Dollar Slips as Iran Peace Hopes Ease Rate Hike Fears 
Gold Prices Slip as Stronger Dollar and Iran Peace Talk Uncertainty Weigh on Market 
Asian Stocks Slip as U.S.-Iran Tensions Weigh on Markets; South Korea’s KOSPI Hits Record High 
Ferrari Luce: How Ferrari Evolved From Hybrid Supercars to Its First Fully Electric Vehicle 
Goldman Sachs to Pay $500M in 1MDB Shareholder Fraud Settlement 
Dollar Gains Slightly as U.S.-Iran Tensions Keep Forex Markets on Edge 
Yen Stays Near Intervention Zone as Iran Conflict Supports U.S. Dollar 
SK Hynix Joins $1 Trillion Club as AI Chip Demand Fuels Stock Surge 
Lam Research Expands AI-Powered Semiconductor Tools and Arizona Operations 
BOJ Signals Possible Rate Hike as Middle East Tensions Fuel Inflation Concerns 
Subway has been placed in a difficult situation after The New York Times released its lab test report on the sandwich chain’s Subway tuna product. It was said that the publication initiated the lab test due to the company’s lawsuits.
As per Fox Business, a 60-inch Subway tuna sandwich was tested at a lab and the result stated that “no amplifiable tuna DNA was present” in the food item. This means that the lab analysis failed to find or identify any tuna DNA in the food.
The tuna sandwich test
Subway has been wrapped up in some lawsuits regarding its sandwiches. Customers have different complaints but there was a customer who said that the tuna in the tuna sandwich is not the fish that everyone knows. In simpler words, it was claimed that the tuna could not be real tuna meat.
In any case, in The New York Times report, it said that it brought sandwiches from three different Subway outlets around Los Angeles for testing. This was done after a customer filed a lawsuit earlier this year, claiming the tuna fish is made from "a mixture of various concoctions."
For the lab test, the tuna was frozen and was brought to the lab. It was mentioned that a PCR test was done to determine if the tuna from Subway’s sandwiches is one of the five tuna species. However, the lab could not identify which species because it did not find tuna DNA at all.
It is fake tuna?
Then again, it cannot be assumed that Subway is using fake tuna in its sandwiches. In fact, this may not be the truth because it was explained that there are two possible reasons why the tuna DNA was not detected.
"One, it’s so heavily processed that whatever we could pull out, we couldn’t make an identification,” the lab’s spokesman told The New York Times. “Or we got some and there’s just nothing there that’s tuna."
On the other hand, some experts said that it is also possible that the DNA disappeared when tuna was cooked. Because in this process, the protein breaks down and this makes it difficult to spot the DNA.
