Tesla Roadster Reveal Could Feature SpaceX Thrusters in August 
China Automakers Accelerate Global Expansion as Domestic Car Sales Slump 
Juan Orlando Hernandez Seeks Dismissal of Honduras Charges After Trump Pardon 
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $5.5 Billion Talc Settlement to Resolve U.S. Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits 
Anthropic Eyes $6B Decart AI Acquisition Ahead of Mega IPO 
EEOC Drops Penn Subpoena in Antisemitism Probe, Investigation Continues 
SpaceX Shares Surge as Wall Street Backs AI Growth Potential 
Maduro U.S. Drug Trafficking Trial Set for June 2027 as Immunity Defense Looms 
California ICE Detention Center Found to Have Inadequate Medical Care, Court Monitor Says 
Maduro, U.S. Prosecutors Propose June 2027 Trial Date in Drug Trafficking Case 
Goldman Sachs Eyes Investors for Nvidia’s $500 Billion AI Financing Plan 
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief 
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight 
Trump Election Order Blocked Again as Appeals Court Rejects Mail-In Voting Push in 23 States 
Antofagasta Shares Drop 5% as Miner Cuts 2026 Copper Production Forecast 
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Freelancer Over North Korea Military Report 
Cisco Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Growth as AI Networking Demand Surges 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Tesla emerged victorious on Tuesday in the first U.S. trial concerning allegations that its Autopilot driver assistant feature resulted in a fatality. This verdict represents a significant triumph for Tesla as it faces multiple similar lawsuits nationwide.
Jury Verdict Marks Second Win for Tesla
This latest jury verdict marks Tesla's second major win this year, as juries have consistently declined to find the company's software defective, reports Reuters. Tesla has been actively testing and rolling out its Autopilot feature, as well as its more advanced Full Self-Driving (FSD) system.
The case, heard in a California state court, was filed by two passengers involved in a 2019 crash. They accused Tesla of being aware of Autopilot's defects at the time of sale, as per The Guardian. Tesla vehemently defended itself, attributing the crash to human error.
The 12-member jury unanimously announced that the vehicle involved in the crash did not possess a manufacturing defect. The final vote resulted in a 9-3 decision in Tesla's favor.
Riverside County Lawsuit Allegations
The civil lawsuit, filed in Riverside County Superior Court, asserted that the Autopilot system caused the owner's Model 3 to suddenly veer off the highway, striking a palm tree and resulting in a fiery crash, all within seconds.
Tesla steadfastly denied any liability, alleging that the owner, Micah Lee, had consumed alcohol before operating the vehicle. Tesla also contended that it was uncertain whether Autopilot was engaged at the time of the incident.
During the trial, the jury in Riverside was solely tasked with evaluating whether a manufacturing defect had influenced the steering mechanism.
Advocates for the plaintiffs presented a 2017 internal Tesla safety analysis, identifying an "incorrect steering command" as a potential defect involving an "excessive" steering wheel angle. However, Tesla's legal representation argued that the safety analysis was not indicative of a defect but rather aimed at addressing any hypothetical issues that might arise with the vehicle.
Tesla had previously won another trial in Los Angeles in April, arguing that their technology requires human monitoring despite the names "Autopilot" and "Full Self-Driving." Jurors believed that Tesla adequately warned drivers about the system and attributed the accident to driver distraction.
Photo: Paul Cuad/Unsplash
