In a controversial move, the Trump administration has agreed to permit the sale and ownership of forced-reset triggers—devices that can enable semiautomatic rifles to fire at speeds comparable to machine guns. The decision follows a settlement announced Friday by the Department of Justice (DOJ), ending lawsuits originally filed under former President Joe Biden, who had moved to ban the devices.
Attorney General Pamela Bondi defended the settlement, emphasizing Second Amendment rights. “This Department of Justice believes that the 2nd Amendment is not a second-class right,” Bondi stated, adding that the agreement ends unnecessary litigation while promoting public safety.
Forced-reset triggers, previously determined by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to fall under the National Firearms Act as illegal machine guns, were banned during the Biden administration. A key lawsuit filed by the DOJ in 2023 targeted Rare Breed Triggers, a company that sold such devices, resulting in a court order halting sales.
However, while the case was under appeal, the National Association for Gun Rights challenged the ban in Texas, where a judge ruled it unlawful. The new settlement ends these legal battles, mandates the return of seized or surrendered forced-reset triggers to owners, and prevents enforcement of the machine gun ban on these devices—provided they are not intended for use with handguns.
Gun control advocates, including Vanessa Gonzalez of Giffords, sharply criticized the move, warning it effectively legalizes machine guns and puts lives at risk. In contrast, Dudley Brown of the National Association for Gun Rights praised the outcome, framing it as a victory for firearm owners’ rights.
The settlement is expected to spark renewed national debate over gun control, firearm accessories, and the boundaries of Second Amendment protections.


California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit
Trump Sues BBC for Defamation Over Edited Capitol Riot Speech Clip
Trump Claims Pardon for Tina Peters Despite No Legal Authority
Lukashenko Urges Swift Ukraine Peace Deal, Backs Trump’s Push for Rapid Resolution
California, 18 States Sue to Block Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools
Federal Judge Declines to Immediately Halt Trump’s $300 Million White House Ballroom Project
Bolivia’s Ex-President Luis Arce Detained in Embezzlement Probe
Bolsonaro’s Defense Requests Hospital Transfer and Humanitarian House Arrest
Honduras Election Recount Delayed Amid Protests and Political Tensions
Trump Announces $1,776 Cash Bonus for U.S. Military Personnel Ahead of Christmas
Jimmy Lai Convicted Under Hong Kong National Security Law in Landmark Case
U.S. Pressures ICC to Limit Authority as Washington Threatens New Sanctions
U.S. Senators Move Toward Deal to Strengthen Military Helicopter Safety Rules
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Pause on New Wind-Energy Permits
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations 



