Detroit’s high property taxes are driving a housing affordability crisis – how can city leaders bring down costs? 
Trump Administration Threatens Newark Airport International Travel Shutdown Over Immigration Dispute 
Takeda Hit With $885M Verdict Over Amitiza Generic Drug Delay Scheme 
YouTube and Snap Settle School District Mental Health Lawsuit Ahead of Major Social Media Trial 
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice 
Kentucky School District Secures $27 Million in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Settlements 
DOJ Pushes to Resume Trump White House Ballroom Project After Security Incident 
Trump Signs Executive Order to Expand Access to Federal Lands in the U.S. 
DOJ Investigates Group Linked to Reid Hoffman Over E. Jean Carroll Lawsuit Funding 
U.S.-China Taiwan Conflict Could Trigger Nuclear Escalation, IISS Warns 
Poland Considers Revoking Zelensky’s Top Honor Over Controversial UPA Army Unit Recognition 
Flavio Bolsonaro Meets Trump, JD Vance, and Marco Rubio Amid Brazil Political Crisis 
US Expands Criminal Investigation Into Nicolas Maduro With New Florida Probe 
US-Iran Ceasefire Extension Near as Strait of Hormuz Shipping Deal Advances 
US Condemns Russia’s Oreshnik Missile Strike, Warns Against New Attacks on Kyiv 
U.S. Lawmakers Back Ukraine’s Request for More Patriot Missiles Amid Rising Russian Attacks 
U.S. Reinstates Sanctions on U.N. Expert Francesca Albanese Amid Legal Battle 
The Trump administration has filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, urging judges to lift a court-ordered halt on the construction of a new White House ballroom. Officials argue that the pause creates serious national security vulnerabilities, leaving the White House "open and exposed" to potential threats against the president, his family, and White House staff.
The legal battle stems from a ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, who this week ordered construction to stop pending the outcome of a lawsuit filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The organization argues that the $400 million renovation project requires explicit congressional approval before moving forward. Judge Leon granted a 14-day window for the administration to challenge his decision, which it acted on swiftly by filing the emergency appeal.
The administration has strongly dismissed the preservation group's legal challenge as "legally baseless," maintaining that the president holds full constitutional authority to oversee renovations to the White House. Officials also raised questions about whether the plaintiffs have the legal standing necessary to bring such a case to court in the first place.
The controversial project came after the demolition of the historic East Wing, a structure originally constructed in 1902 and later expanded under President Franklin D. Roosevelt during World War II. The ballroom is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to redesign and modernize several prominent landmarks across Washington, D.C.
As the legal dispute works its way through the courts, debate continues over the balance between presidential authority, congressional oversight, and the preservation of historically significant government buildings. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for future White House renovation projects and the limits of executive power in managing federal properties.
