Nvidia and Groq Strike Strategic AI Inference Licensing Deal 
Waymo Plans Safety and Emergency Response Upgrades After San Francisco Robotaxi Disruptions 
South Korean Court Clears Korea Zinc’s $7.4 Billion U.S. Smelter Project, Shares Surge 
Amazon in Talks to Invest $10 Billion in OpenAI as AI Firm Eyes $1 Trillion IPO Valuation 
U.S. Stocks Hold Steady After Christmas as Trading Volumes Stay Light 
Texas App Store Age Verification Law Blocked by Federal Judge in First Amendment Ruling 
UBS Warns of Short-Term Risks as Precious Metals Rally to Record Highs 
Russian Stocks End Lower as Energy and Mining Shares Weigh on MOEX Index 
Hanwha Signals Readiness to Build Nuclear-Powered Submarines at Philly Shipyard for U.S. Navy 
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand 
Boeing Wins $2.04B U.S. Air Force Contract for B-52 Engine Replacement Program 
Saks Global Weighs Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Debt Pressures and Luxury Retail Slowdown 
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Slide Amid Report of Potential Paramount Skydance Lawsuit 
Winter Storm Devin Triggers Massive Flight Cancellations and Travel Disruptions Across the U.S. 
Dina Powell McCormick Resigns From Meta Board After Eight Months, May Take Advisory Role 
Gold and Silver Hit Record Highs as Safe-Haven Demand Surges Amid Global Uncertainty 
SUPERFORTUNE Launches AI-Powered Mobile App, Expanding Beyond Web3 Into $392 Billion Metaphysics Market 
The US Supreme Court will examine the effects of a law known as Section 230, which has protected tech companies from lawsuits related to their platforms’ content since 1996, to a case related to the November 2015 attacks in Paris.
The top court in the U.S. will continue its consideration of a very similar case, but this time asking if platforms should be subject to anti-terrorism laws.
The relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, one of the 130 victims of the attacks in the French capital, blamed Google-owned YouTube for having recommended videos from the jihadist group to users, helping along the call to violence.
According to the relatives, Google assisted ISIS in spreading its message and thus providing material support by recommending the terrorist’s videos to users.
The complaint was dismissed by the federal courts on behalf of a law,
Section 230 states that in the US internet companies cannot be considered publishers and have legal immunity for the content posted on their platforms.
But the complainants insist that the highly complex recommendation systems perfected by big platforms fall out of the scope of Section 230.
The nine justices will examine and their ruling, expected by June 30, could have huge repercussions for the future of the internet.
