Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project 
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock 
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Jensen Huang Urges Taiwan Suppliers to Boost AI Chip Production Amid Surging Demand 
Nvidia Nears $20 Billion OpenAI Investment as AI Funding Race Intensifies 
Oil Prices Slip as U.S.–Iran Talks Ease Supply Disruption Fears 
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines 
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer 
The US Supreme Court will examine the effects of a law known as Section 230, which has protected tech companies from lawsuits related to their platforms’ content since 1996, to a case related to the November 2015 attacks in Paris.
The top court in the U.S. will continue its consideration of a very similar case, but this time asking if platforms should be subject to anti-terrorism laws.
The relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, one of the 130 victims of the attacks in the French capital, blamed Google-owned YouTube for having recommended videos from the jihadist group to users, helping along the call to violence.
According to the relatives, Google assisted ISIS in spreading its message and thus providing material support by recommending the terrorist’s videos to users.
The complaint was dismissed by the federal courts on behalf of a law,
Section 230 states that in the US internet companies cannot be considered publishers and have legal immunity for the content posted on their platforms.
But the complainants insist that the highly complex recommendation systems perfected by big platforms fall out of the scope of Section 230.
The nine justices will examine and their ruling, expected by June 30, could have huge repercussions for the future of the internet.
