Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Delayed Until 2027 Amid Antitrust Lawsuit 
Japan Government Backs Earlier BOJ Rate Hike as Inflation Pressures Build 
Goldman Sachs Eyes Investors for Nvidia’s $500 Billion AI Financing Plan 
Australia’s Corporate Leaders Face Parliament Over KPMG Client Data Scandal 
Peru Court Frees Former President Ollanta Humala After Conviction Overturned 
Thyssenkrupp Raises 2026 Profit Outlook as Steel and Materials Units Strengthen 
Gold Prices Slip From 10-Week High as Fed and Hormuz Risks Shape Outlook 
European Stocks Rise as U.S. Inflation Data Eases Fed Rate Hike Fears 
US Dollar Slips as Weak Retail Sales Reduce Fed Rate Hike Bets 
France Inflation Rises 2.4% in July as Consumer Prices Increase 
Stripe, Advent Reportedly Pursue $53 Billion PayPal Takeover 
Google Pushes Gemini AI Overhaul as Sergey Brin Targets Model Supremacy 
China Automakers Accelerate Global Expansion as Domestic Car Sales Slump 
Asian Stocks Rally as Cooling US Inflation Boosts Fed Rate Outlook 
Super Micro Stock Jumps 19% as AI Server Demand Drives Strong 2027 Outlook 
Micron Stock Upgraded to Buy as New Street Sees $2 Trillion Valuation Potential 
Anthropic Eyes $6B Decart AI Acquisition Ahead of Mega IPO 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The US Supreme Court will examine the effects of a law known as Section 230, which has protected tech companies from lawsuits related to their platforms’ content since 1996, to a case related to the November 2015 attacks in Paris.
The top court in the U.S. will continue its consideration of a very similar case, but this time asking if platforms should be subject to anti-terrorism laws.
The relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, one of the 130 victims of the attacks in the French capital, blamed Google-owned YouTube for having recommended videos from the jihadist group to users, helping along the call to violence.
According to the relatives, Google assisted ISIS in spreading its message and thus providing material support by recommending the terrorist’s videos to users.
The complaint was dismissed by the federal courts on behalf of a law,
Section 230 states that in the US internet companies cannot be considered publishers and have legal immunity for the content posted on their platforms.
But the complainants insist that the highly complex recommendation systems perfected by big platforms fall out of the scope of Section 230.
The nine justices will examine and their ruling, expected by June 30, could have huge repercussions for the future of the internet.
