Uber has agreed to pay A$271.8 million ($178 million) to settle a lawsuit brought by Australian taxi operators and drivers. They claimed to have lost income due to the ride-hailing company's entry into the country.
Reuters noted that the settlement, announced by Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, marks Australia's fifth-largest legal agreement.
Class Action Suit Filed
The class action suit, initiated in the Supreme Court of Victoria State in 2019, represents over 8,000 taxi and hire car owners and drivers. The lawsuit accuses Uber of violating laws that mandate taxis and hire cars to be licensed. Uber's arrival in 2012 disrupted the revenue streams of licensed taxi drivers and devalued the licenses they had invested in.
Uber's Response and Settlement
According to Yahoo, Uber has consistently denied any deliberate breaches of the law. Maurice Blackburn Principal Michael Donelly highlighted the company's strenuous defense throughout the legal process.
However, after years of contention, Uber has opted to settle the matter, according to Donelly. Uber mentioned its contributions to state-level taxi compensation schemes since 2018 and stated that the proposed settlement closes this chapter.
Former Lawmaker's Perspective
Former lawmaker and taxi driver Rod Barton, part of the class action, believes the settlement validates Uber's disregard for the country's taxi licensing regulations. Barton emphasized Uber's conscious avoidance of the licensing rules to gain a competitive edge over the taxi industry. He underscored the significance of the lawsuit in holding Uber accountable for its actions.
Impact of Legislative Changes
In 2015, legislative amendments allowed Uber to operate without taxi licenses, prompting state governments to establish compensation schemes for taxi drivers and license owners. This shift in regulations played a pivotal role in shaping the competitive landscape between traditional taxi services and app-based ride-hailing companies.
The settlement has elicited mixed reactions from various stakeholders. Members of the public and users of ride-sharing services have expressed concerns about potential increases in fares as a result of the settlement. On the other hand, taxi and rental car owners see the settlement as a bittersweet victory. It provides some level of compensation for their losses but does not fully address the long-term impact on their livelihoods.
Industry analysts believe this case sets a significant precedent for how disruptive technologies are integrated into traditional industries, highlighting the need for regulations that protect existing businesses while encouraging innovation.
Photo: Uber Newsroom


Democratic Attorneys General Sue Trump Administration Over Proposed Limits on Gender-Affirming Care for Youth
John Carreyrou Sues Major AI Firms Over Alleged Copyrighted Book Use in AI Training
South Korean Court Clears Korea Zinc’s $7.4 Billion U.S. Smelter Project, Shares Surge
Texas App Store Age Verification Law Blocked by Federal Judge in First Amendment Ruling
Elon Musk Wins Reinstatement of Historic Tesla Pay Package After Delaware Supreme Court Ruling
Bolsonaro Endorses Son Flavio for Brazil’s 2026 Presidential Election From Hospital
ByteDance Plans Massive AI Investment in 2026 to Close Gap With U.S. Tech Giants
Sanofi to Acquire Dynavax in $2.2 Billion Deal to Strengthen Vaccines Portfolio
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial
New Epstein Photos Surface Showing Trump as Lawmakers Near Document Release Deadline
Italy Fines Apple €98.6 Million Over App Store Dominance
Tunisia Protests Grow as Opposition Unites Against President Kais Saied’s Rule
California, 18 States Sue to Block Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
FDA Approves Mitapivat for Anemia in Thalassemia Patients
BlackRock-Backed Global Ports Deal Faces Uncertainty Amid Cosco Demands
DOJ Reaches Settlement With Blackstone’s LivCor Over Alleged Rent Price-Fixing 



