US Appeals Court Limits ICE Detention Without Bond Hearings After 90 Days 
Japan Eyes Bigger GPIF Investment in Domestic Assets as BOJ Independence Concerns Grow 
US Back-to-School Spending Seen Falling as Families Focus on Essentials 
California Drivers Sue BP, Walmart, 7-Eleven Over Alleged AI Gas Price Fixing 
Gold Prices Slip as U.S.-Iran Conflict, Fed Rate Hike Bets Pressure Precious Metals 
SK Hynix Prices Record U.S. ADR Offering at $149 After $200 Billion Investor Demand 
In a rebuke to Trump, the Supreme Court rules that birthright citizenship is the law of the land 
ICC Judges Sue Trump Administration Over Sanctions, Calling Measures Unlawful 
DOJ Orders Crackdown on Birth Tourism After Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship 
Amy Coney Barrett Faces Conservative Backlash After Key Supreme Court Rulings Against Trump 
Japan Regional Bank Stocks Drop After Zentoshin Bankruptcy Sparks Credit Risk Concerns 
China Inflation Cools in June as Producer Prices Hit Four-Year High 
New Mexico AG Accuses DOJ of Delaying Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Investigation 
Wolfspeed Sues Navitas Over GaN and SiC Patent Infringement 
BHP Faces Port Hedland Strike Threat as Iron Ore Export Risks Grow 
Oppenheimer Sees CNH Industrial as Top 2026 Agriculture Stock Pick on Dealer Consolidation Strategy 
US Stock Futures Steady as US-Iran Tensions and Fed Inflation Concerns Weigh on Markets 
Nike and Converse have settled a custom-sneaker lawsuit against its former employee Jeffrey Waskowiak and his company KickRich LLC over a case involving trademark infringement, dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
The brands sued Waskowiak and KickRich on July 19, 2021, in the District of Oregon due to their alleged practice of reselling materially altered Nike and Converse products that they have never approved or authorized.”
According to Nike and Converse, the defendants acquired genuine Nike and Converse footwear and then altered the uppers to create custom footwear products that still display their brand logos.
The plaintiffs alleged that the unauthorized customizations limit their abilities to control their brands, business reputations, and associated goodwill.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the altered footwear falsely affiliated them with other brands, such as Amazon by mashing up an authentic Nike Air Jordan 1 shoe, adding Amazon Prime branding in multiple locations, including next to the signature Nike Swoosh design.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the defendants “make and sell laser cut and digital download ‘shoe patterns' that let others fake several of Nike's iconic and trade-dress protected footwear styles, including the Air Force 1, the Dunk, and the Air Jordan 1”.
Lastly, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have created confusion in the marketplace by including the plaintiffs' vintage logos and slogans, as well as references to Waskowiak's prior employment as a Nike footwear developer, which suggests authorization. The plaintiffs not only sought monetary damages but also injunctive relief.
In December, the parties filed a proposed judgment that emphasized Nike and Converse as the “exclusive owners” of several trademarks and trade dress.
The proposal also included a permanent injunction against KickRich for infringing and diluting the trademarks and for using false designations of origin through its practice of promoting, offering for sale, and selling the products.
Interestingly, KickRich may offer and promote customization services of genuine Nike and Converse products, according to the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement.
As the settlement agreement is confidential, it is unknown what KickRich is permitted to do when providing said customization services.
