Chinese Universities with PLA Ties Found Purchasing Restricted U.S. AI Chips Through Super Micro Servers 
Valero Port Arthur Refinery Explosion Prompts $1M Lawsuit Over Worker Safety Negligence 
Estée Lauder Sues Jo Malone Over Trademark Dispute Involving Zara 
EU and CPTPP Nations Push for Landmark Digital Trade Agreement 
Jefferies Upgrades Sodexo to Buy With €55 Target After Historic CEO Appointment 
Lynas Rare Earths Signs Vietnam Deal with LS Eco Energy to Boost Magnet Metal Production 
Brown-Forman and Pernod Ricard in Merger Talks to Create World's Largest Spirits Giant 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Move to End Temporary Protected Status for Somali Immigrants 
KPMG UK Cuts 440 Audit Jobs Amid Low Attrition and Cooling Professional Services Demand 
Brazil Meat Exports Weather Iran War Disruptions With Rerouted Shipments 
Federal Reserve Hires Robert Hur to Fight DOJ Subpoenas Targeting Jerome Powell 
Aluminum Prices Surge Toward Four-Year Highs After Gulf Smelter Strikes 
Bank of America's $72.5M Epstein Settlement: What You Need to Know 
Federal Judge Blocks Pentagon's Blacklisting of AI Company Anthropic 
Jerome Powell May Stay on Fed Board Amid Criminal Investigation, Court Documents Reveal 
McDonald's and Restaurant Brands International Face Headwinds Amid Iran Conflict and Rising Costs 
Europe's Aviation Sector on Track to Meet 2025 Green Fuel Mandate 
Nike and Converse have settled a custom-sneaker lawsuit against its former employee Jeffrey Waskowiak and his company KickRich LLC over a case involving trademark infringement, dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
The brands sued Waskowiak and KickRich on July 19, 2021, in the District of Oregon due to their alleged practice of reselling materially altered Nike and Converse products that they have never approved or authorized.”
According to Nike and Converse, the defendants acquired genuine Nike and Converse footwear and then altered the uppers to create custom footwear products that still display their brand logos.
The plaintiffs alleged that the unauthorized customizations limit their abilities to control their brands, business reputations, and associated goodwill.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the altered footwear falsely affiliated them with other brands, such as Amazon by mashing up an authentic Nike Air Jordan 1 shoe, adding Amazon Prime branding in multiple locations, including next to the signature Nike Swoosh design.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the defendants “make and sell laser cut and digital download ‘shoe patterns' that let others fake several of Nike's iconic and trade-dress protected footwear styles, including the Air Force 1, the Dunk, and the Air Jordan 1”.
Lastly, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have created confusion in the marketplace by including the plaintiffs' vintage logos and slogans, as well as references to Waskowiak's prior employment as a Nike footwear developer, which suggests authorization. The plaintiffs not only sought monetary damages but also injunctive relief.
In December, the parties filed a proposed judgment that emphasized Nike and Converse as the “exclusive owners” of several trademarks and trade dress.
The proposal also included a permanent injunction against KickRich for infringing and diluting the trademarks and for using false designations of origin through its practice of promoting, offering for sale, and selling the products.
Interestingly, KickRich may offer and promote customization services of genuine Nike and Converse products, according to the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement.
As the settlement agreement is confidential, it is unknown what KickRich is permitted to do when providing said customization services.
