Asian Stocks Fall as Oil Tops $100, Yields Rise 
Optus Apologises After Network Outage Disrupts Emergency Calls 
US Bans Canadian Alcohol, Motorcycles as Trade War Escalates 
Google Revamps EU Search Results to Meet DMA Rules 
OpenAI Targets Specialized Industries as Enterprise AI Demand Grows 
Central Banks Could Buy 20,000 Tonnes of Gold: BofA 
OpenAI Agents Used Websites for Unauthorized Communications 
Brent Oil Tops $100 as Middle East Conflict Threatens Supply 
SEC Sues Former Tricolor Executives Over $1.9 Billion Investor Fraud Scheme 
China Buys 1 Million Tons of U.S. Soybeans Ahead of Xi Visit 
TikTok, DOJ Reach $400 Million Children’s Privacy Settlement 
Apple Unveils $1,999 Foldable iPhone Duo 
Meta Agrees to $18 Billion Settlement, Tightens Teen Social Media Rules 
Novartis Shares Plunge After Muscle Drug Fails Phase III Trial 
OpenAI Rules Out 2026 IPO as Altman Prioritizes AI Safety 
Nvidia Plans 2GW Australia AI Data Center Expansion by 2027 
US Treasury Yields Near 5% as Oil Fuels Inflation Fears 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Nike and Converse have settled a custom-sneaker lawsuit against its former employee Jeffrey Waskowiak and his company KickRich LLC over a case involving trademark infringement, dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
The brands sued Waskowiak and KickRich on July 19, 2021, in the District of Oregon due to their alleged practice of reselling materially altered Nike and Converse products that they have never approved or authorized.”
According to Nike and Converse, the defendants acquired genuine Nike and Converse footwear and then altered the uppers to create custom footwear products that still display their brand logos.
The plaintiffs alleged that the unauthorized customizations limit their abilities to control their brands, business reputations, and associated goodwill.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the altered footwear falsely affiliated them with other brands, such as Amazon by mashing up an authentic Nike Air Jordan 1 shoe, adding Amazon Prime branding in multiple locations, including next to the signature Nike Swoosh design.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the defendants “make and sell laser cut and digital download ‘shoe patterns' that let others fake several of Nike's iconic and trade-dress protected footwear styles, including the Air Force 1, the Dunk, and the Air Jordan 1”.
Lastly, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have created confusion in the marketplace by including the plaintiffs' vintage logos and slogans, as well as references to Waskowiak's prior employment as a Nike footwear developer, which suggests authorization. The plaintiffs not only sought monetary damages but also injunctive relief.
In December, the parties filed a proposed judgment that emphasized Nike and Converse as the “exclusive owners” of several trademarks and trade dress.
The proposal also included a permanent injunction against KickRich for infringing and diluting the trademarks and for using false designations of origin through its practice of promoting, offering for sale, and selling the products.
Interestingly, KickRich may offer and promote customization services of genuine Nike and Converse products, according to the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement.
As the settlement agreement is confidential, it is unknown what KickRich is permitted to do when providing said customization services.
