KOSPI Rebounds 20% as Samsung, SK Hynix Lead South Korea Stock Rally 
Asian Currencies Steady as Markets Await U.S. Inflation Data 
EEOC Drops Penn Subpoena in Antisemitism Probe, Investigation Continues 
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts 
Lenovo Revenue Surges 43% as AI Demand Drives Record First-Quarter Growth 
Cisco Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Growth as AI Networking Demand Surges 
California ICE Detention Center Found to Have Inadequate Medical Care, Court Monitor Says 
Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for Austal US Business 
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief 
Singapore Raises 2026 GDP Growth Forecast to 4.5%-5.5% as AI Boom Fuels Economy 
Australia Sets New Minimum Pay, Insurance Rules for Gig Workers 
Oil Prices Rise as Hormuz Tensions Threaten Global Supply 
Dollar Steady as Markets Await U.S. Inflation Data 
Nvidia Secures $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Push With Wall Street Giants 
Gold Prices Retreat From Two-Month High as Softer Inflation Eases Fed Rate Hike Bets 
Bank of America to Buy Up to 49.9% Stake in Jio Credit for $1.92 Billion 
ASX Faces Legal Action Over Failed Blockchain CHESS Project 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Nike and Converse have settled a custom-sneaker lawsuit against its former employee Jeffrey Waskowiak and his company KickRich LLC over a case involving trademark infringement, dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
The brands sued Waskowiak and KickRich on July 19, 2021, in the District of Oregon due to their alleged practice of reselling materially altered Nike and Converse products that they have never approved or authorized.”
According to Nike and Converse, the defendants acquired genuine Nike and Converse footwear and then altered the uppers to create custom footwear products that still display their brand logos.
The plaintiffs alleged that the unauthorized customizations limit their abilities to control their brands, business reputations, and associated goodwill.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the altered footwear falsely affiliated them with other brands, such as Amazon by mashing up an authentic Nike Air Jordan 1 shoe, adding Amazon Prime branding in multiple locations, including next to the signature Nike Swoosh design.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the defendants “make and sell laser cut and digital download ‘shoe patterns' that let others fake several of Nike's iconic and trade-dress protected footwear styles, including the Air Force 1, the Dunk, and the Air Jordan 1”.
Lastly, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have created confusion in the marketplace by including the plaintiffs' vintage logos and slogans, as well as references to Waskowiak's prior employment as a Nike footwear developer, which suggests authorization. The plaintiffs not only sought monetary damages but also injunctive relief.
In December, the parties filed a proposed judgment that emphasized Nike and Converse as the “exclusive owners” of several trademarks and trade dress.
The proposal also included a permanent injunction against KickRich for infringing and diluting the trademarks and for using false designations of origin through its practice of promoting, offering for sale, and selling the products.
Interestingly, KickRich may offer and promote customization services of genuine Nike and Converse products, according to the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement.
As the settlement agreement is confidential, it is unknown what KickRich is permitted to do when providing said customization services.
