Meta Acquires AI Startup Manus to Expand Advanced AI Capabilities Across Platforms 
Lockheed Martin Secures Nearly $500 Million in U.S. and Allied Defense Contracts 
California Drops Lawsuit Over Federal Funding Cuts to High-Speed Rail Project 
Bolsonaro Endorses Son Flavio for Brazil’s 2026 Presidential Election From Hospital 
European Markets Mixed as Pound Weakens and Major Corporate Deals Emerge 
Gold Prices Rebound in Europe as Geopolitical Tensions and Fed Outlook Support Bullion 
Citigroup to Exit Russia With Sale of AO Citibank to Renaissance Capital 
Applied Digital Stock Rises on AI Cloud Spinoff Plan and ChronoScale Launch 
Bolsonaro Undergoes Second Medical Procedure for Persistent Hiccups While Hospitalized in Brasilia 
Asian Markets Slip as Precious Metals Cool, Geopolitical Tensions Weigh on Sentiment 
Federal Judge Declines to Immediately Halt Trump’s $300 Million White House Ballroom Project 
China Manufacturing PMI Rebounds in December, Offering Boost to Economic Growth Outlook 
Royalty Pharma Stock Rises After Acquiring Full Evrysdi Royalty Rights from PTC Therapeutics 
Najib Razak Awaits Court Rulings in 1MDB Case as Malaysia’s Anti-Graft Drive Faces Test 
Justice Department Restores Trump Photo in Epstein Files After Review Clears Image 
South Korea Inflation Rises to 2.3% in December, Matching Market Expectations 
Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly Cut Obesity Drug Prices in China, Boosting Access to Wegovy and Mounjaro 
Nike and Converse have settled a custom-sneaker lawsuit against its former employee Jeffrey Waskowiak and his company KickRich LLC over a case involving trademark infringement, dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
The brands sued Waskowiak and KickRich on July 19, 2021, in the District of Oregon due to their alleged practice of reselling materially altered Nike and Converse products that they have never approved or authorized.”
According to Nike and Converse, the defendants acquired genuine Nike and Converse footwear and then altered the uppers to create custom footwear products that still display their brand logos.
The plaintiffs alleged that the unauthorized customizations limit their abilities to control their brands, business reputations, and associated goodwill.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the altered footwear falsely affiliated them with other brands, such as Amazon by mashing up an authentic Nike Air Jordan 1 shoe, adding Amazon Prime branding in multiple locations, including next to the signature Nike Swoosh design.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the defendants “make and sell laser cut and digital download ‘shoe patterns' that let others fake several of Nike's iconic and trade-dress protected footwear styles, including the Air Force 1, the Dunk, and the Air Jordan 1”.
Lastly, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have created confusion in the marketplace by including the plaintiffs' vintage logos and slogans, as well as references to Waskowiak's prior employment as a Nike footwear developer, which suggests authorization. The plaintiffs not only sought monetary damages but also injunctive relief.
In December, the parties filed a proposed judgment that emphasized Nike and Converse as the “exclusive owners” of several trademarks and trade dress.
The proposal also included a permanent injunction against KickRich for infringing and diluting the trademarks and for using false designations of origin through its practice of promoting, offering for sale, and selling the products.
Interestingly, KickRich may offer and promote customization services of genuine Nike and Converse products, according to the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement.
As the settlement agreement is confidential, it is unknown what KickRich is permitted to do when providing said customization services.
