Xiaomi may be allowed to do business again in the U.S. after the country’s federal court stopped the government from prohibiting the Americans from investing in the company. This means that the restrictions against the Chinese smartphone-maker have been lifted.
The root of the ban
Under Donald Trump’s administration, Xiaomi was added to the list of companies that allegedly have ties with the Chinese military. It was the state’s Defense Department that included the tech company in the list, and this resulted in the then-president’s decision to impose financial restrictions on the company.
This prohibited businesses in the U.S. from investing and doing business with Chinese companies, including Xiaomi. This effectively blocked the smartphone manufacturer from selling or supplying its goods to U.S. clients.
Xiaomi wins in its lawsuit
However, on Friday, March 12, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras of Washington temporarily blocked the Defense Department from disallowing U.S. investments in Xiaomi. The judge just canceled the ban and clearly sided with the Chinese company in its lawsuit that aims to have its name removed from the blacklisted firms.
In his decision, Judge Contreras said that the move was “arbitrary and capricious” and visibly stripped Xiaomi of its rights to due process. As per Bloomberg, the judge added that Xiaomi is also most likely to win in the lawsuit and fully reverse the ban so it can start doing business again in the U.S.
The decision was also said to have been placed to prevent the company from suffering from further irreparable harm. This is because when the prohibition was initially announced, Xiaomi was faced with the likelihood of being de-listed from the U.S. stock exchange, which in turn will lead to its removal from global benchmark indexes. When this happens, it will be a big business disaster for the company.
Finally, The Wall Street Journal reported that Judge Contreras pointed out that being a technology company doesn’t suggest a link to the Chinese military. He said that “investment in technology does not necessarily equate to military link.” He further reasoned that the U.S. was not able to convincingly show that there is such a connection between Xiaomi and the Chinese army.
“Xiaomi is a publicly-traded company that produces commercial products for civilian use, is controlled by its independent board and controlling shareholders, and is not effectively controlled or associated with others under the ownership or control of the PRC or its security services,” he said.


Sigma Healthcare Shares Slide Amid Preliminary Boots Acquisition Talks
Trump Administration Defends Anthropic AI Restrictions in Ongoing Federal Lawsuit
SpaceX IPO Demand Surges Past $250 Billion Ahead of Historic Market Debut
EngineAI Files for Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising Demand for AI and Robotics Stocks
Changchun Targets EV Growth as China’s Auto Industry Consolidation Accelerates
Coupang Hit With Record $409 Million Fine Over Data Breach Affecting 33 Million Users
oOh!media Takeover Battle Intensifies as Bain Capital Joins Competing Bids
Meta Partners With Reliance to Launch First AI-Powered Data Center in India
Wizz Air Beats Profit Forecast as Cost Controls Offset Industry Challenges
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions
Frasers Group Launches €2 Billion Hugo Boss Takeover Offer Amid Control Speculation
Meta AI Strategy Faces Challenges as Zuckerberg Admits Mistakes in Internal Memo
Exxon Mobil Set to Appoint Alex Volkov as Global Trading Chief
SpaceX IPO Set for Explosive Debut as Valuation Tops $2.2 Trillion
Woodside Energy Acquires PetroChina’s Browse Stake, Expands Position in Major Australian Gas Project
GSK Reportedly Nears $9 Billion Acquisition of Cancer Drug Developer Nuvalent
Roku Explores Sale Options as Interest Grows in Streaming and Ad Business 



