Xiaomi may be allowed to do business again in the U.S. after the country’s federal court stopped the government from prohibiting the Americans from investing in the company. This means that the restrictions against the Chinese smartphone-maker have been lifted.
The root of the ban
Under Donald Trump’s administration, Xiaomi was added to the list of companies that allegedly have ties with the Chinese military. It was the state’s Defense Department that included the tech company in the list, and this resulted in the then-president’s decision to impose financial restrictions on the company.
This prohibited businesses in the U.S. from investing and doing business with Chinese companies, including Xiaomi. This effectively blocked the smartphone manufacturer from selling or supplying its goods to U.S. clients.
Xiaomi wins in its lawsuit
However, on Friday, March 12, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras of Washington temporarily blocked the Defense Department from disallowing U.S. investments in Xiaomi. The judge just canceled the ban and clearly sided with the Chinese company in its lawsuit that aims to have its name removed from the blacklisted firms.
In his decision, Judge Contreras said that the move was “arbitrary and capricious” and visibly stripped Xiaomi of its rights to due process. As per Bloomberg, the judge added that Xiaomi is also most likely to win in the lawsuit and fully reverse the ban so it can start doing business again in the U.S.
The decision was also said to have been placed to prevent the company from suffering from further irreparable harm. This is because when the prohibition was initially announced, Xiaomi was faced with the likelihood of being de-listed from the U.S. stock exchange, which in turn will lead to its removal from global benchmark indexes. When this happens, it will be a big business disaster for the company.
Finally, The Wall Street Journal reported that Judge Contreras pointed out that being a technology company doesn’t suggest a link to the Chinese military. He said that “investment in technology does not necessarily equate to military link.” He further reasoned that the U.S. was not able to convincingly show that there is such a connection between Xiaomi and the Chinese army.
“Xiaomi is a publicly-traded company that produces commercial products for civilian use, is controlled by its independent board and controlling shareholders, and is not effectively controlled or associated with others under the ownership or control of the PRC or its security services,” he said.


Tokyo Electric Power Attracts Major Investors Amid Billion-Dollar Restructuring Push
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles
U.S. Automakers Push Back Against EU Rules Blocking American Trucks from European Market
OpenAI Addresses Security Vulnerability in macOS App Certification Process
TSMC Posts Strong Q1 2025 Revenue, Riding AI Chip Demand Wave
San Francisco Suspect Arrested After Molotov Cocktail Attack on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's Home
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis
MATCH Act: How New U.S. Chip Legislation Could Freeze China's Semiconductor Ambitions
Rio Tinto's California Boron Assets Attract Over a Dozen Bidders, Valued at Up to $2 Billion
Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization
Chinese Cars in Europe: Consumer Trust Is Shifting Fast
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit
FedEx Pilots and Union Reach Tentative Agreement on 40% Pay Increase
Goldman Sachs, ANZ Cut Oil Forecasts Amid U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Hopes 



