Xiaomi may be allowed to do business again in the U.S. after the country’s federal court stopped the government from prohibiting the Americans from investing in the company. This means that the restrictions against the Chinese smartphone-maker have been lifted.
The root of the ban
Under Donald Trump’s administration, Xiaomi was added to the list of companies that allegedly have ties with the Chinese military. It was the state’s Defense Department that included the tech company in the list, and this resulted in the then-president’s decision to impose financial restrictions on the company.
This prohibited businesses in the U.S. from investing and doing business with Chinese companies, including Xiaomi. This effectively blocked the smartphone manufacturer from selling or supplying its goods to U.S. clients.
Xiaomi wins in its lawsuit
However, on Friday, March 12, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras of Washington temporarily blocked the Defense Department from disallowing U.S. investments in Xiaomi. The judge just canceled the ban and clearly sided with the Chinese company in its lawsuit that aims to have its name removed from the blacklisted firms.
In his decision, Judge Contreras said that the move was “arbitrary and capricious” and visibly stripped Xiaomi of its rights to due process. As per Bloomberg, the judge added that Xiaomi is also most likely to win in the lawsuit and fully reverse the ban so it can start doing business again in the U.S.
The decision was also said to have been placed to prevent the company from suffering from further irreparable harm. This is because when the prohibition was initially announced, Xiaomi was faced with the likelihood of being de-listed from the U.S. stock exchange, which in turn will lead to its removal from global benchmark indexes. When this happens, it will be a big business disaster for the company.
Finally, The Wall Street Journal reported that Judge Contreras pointed out that being a technology company doesn’t suggest a link to the Chinese military. He said that “investment in technology does not necessarily equate to military link.” He further reasoned that the U.S. was not able to convincingly show that there is such a connection between Xiaomi and the Chinese army.
“Xiaomi is a publicly-traded company that produces commercial products for civilian use, is controlled by its independent board and controlling shareholders, and is not effectively controlled or associated with others under the ownership or control of the PRC or its security services,” he said.


ASX Faces Legal Action Over Failed Blockchain CHESS Project
Sanrio Shares Plunge as Q1 Profit Miss Overshadows Strong Sales
Pandora Shares Rise as Q2 Results Beat Forecasts, 2026 Outlook Raised
Natura Q2 Profit Plunges 92% as Financial Expenses Weigh on Earnings
ANZ Home Loan Applications Drop 12% After Australia Property Tax Changes
SpaceX Shares Surge as Wall Street Backs AI Growth Potential
Google Pushes Gemini AI Overhaul as Sergey Brin Targets Model Supremacy
Super Micro Stock Jumps 19% as AI Server Demand Drives Strong 2027 Outlook
JPMorgan Plans More Asia-Pacific Hiring in 2027 as Corporate Banking Revenue Surges
Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for Austal US Business
CBA Posts Record A$10.98B Profit Despite Cautious Outlook
Airbus Joins Air India A320 Altitude Drop Probe
Hims & Hers Shares Fall as GLP-1 Costs Widen Q2 Loss
Cisco Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Growth as AI Networking Demand Surges
ADNOC Gas Targets Up to $4B Profit in 2026
Nvidia Secures $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Push With Wall Street Giants
Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Returns to Netflix With Major New Stake 



