Xiaomi may be allowed to do business again in the U.S. after the country’s federal court stopped the government from prohibiting the Americans from investing in the company. This means that the restrictions against the Chinese smartphone-maker have been lifted.
The root of the ban
Under Donald Trump’s administration, Xiaomi was added to the list of companies that allegedly have ties with the Chinese military. It was the state’s Defense Department that included the tech company in the list, and this resulted in the then-president’s decision to impose financial restrictions on the company.
This prohibited businesses in the U.S. from investing and doing business with Chinese companies, including Xiaomi. This effectively blocked the smartphone manufacturer from selling or supplying its goods to U.S. clients.
Xiaomi wins in its lawsuit
However, on Friday, March 12, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras of Washington temporarily blocked the Defense Department from disallowing U.S. investments in Xiaomi. The judge just canceled the ban and clearly sided with the Chinese company in its lawsuit that aims to have its name removed from the blacklisted firms.
In his decision, Judge Contreras said that the move was “arbitrary and capricious” and visibly stripped Xiaomi of its rights to due process. As per Bloomberg, the judge added that Xiaomi is also most likely to win in the lawsuit and fully reverse the ban so it can start doing business again in the U.S.
The decision was also said to have been placed to prevent the company from suffering from further irreparable harm. This is because when the prohibition was initially announced, Xiaomi was faced with the likelihood of being de-listed from the U.S. stock exchange, which in turn will lead to its removal from global benchmark indexes. When this happens, it will be a big business disaster for the company.
Finally, The Wall Street Journal reported that Judge Contreras pointed out that being a technology company doesn’t suggest a link to the Chinese military. He said that “investment in technology does not necessarily equate to military link.” He further reasoned that the U.S. was not able to convincingly show that there is such a connection between Xiaomi and the Chinese army.
“Xiaomi is a publicly-traded company that produces commercial products for civilian use, is controlled by its independent board and controlling shareholders, and is not effectively controlled or associated with others under the ownership or control of the PRC or its security services,” he said.


San Francisco Suspect Arrested After Molotov Cocktail Attack on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's Home
BHP's Incoming CEO Visits China Amid Pricing Dispute with CMRG
MATCH Act: How New U.S. Chip Legislation Could Freeze China's Semiconductor Ambitions
Pony.ai, Uber, and Verne Launch Europe's First Commercial Robotaxi Service in Zagreb
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy
OpenAI Addresses Security Vulnerability in macOS App Certification Process
Chinese Cars in Europe: Consumer Trust Is Shifting Fast
FedEx Pilots and Union Reach Tentative Agreement on 40% Pay Increase
Kia Cuts EV Sales Target for 2030 Amid Slowing Demand and U.S. Policy Shifts
U.S. Automakers Push Back Against EU Rules Blocking American Trucks from European Market
Bank of America Identifies Top Asia-Pacific Semiconductor Stocks Poised for AI-Driven Growth
Lumentum Holdings Rides AI Wave With Order Book Filled Through 2028
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization
Rio Tinto's California Boron Assets Attract Over a Dozen Bidders, Valued at Up to $2 Billion 



