Former US President Donald Trump is already at the center of several investigations taking place in different states. Democratic Rep. Katie Porter has recently raised awareness of a possible bribery scheme involving the former president and one of his cabinet officials.
Speaking on MSNBC Wednesday, Porter revealed details about a possible bribery scheme involving Trump’s former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and his deputy David Bernhardt with real estate developer Mike Ingram. Porter said that Bernhardt and Ingram had an off-the-record meeting that is believed to have resulted in a kind of quid pro quo.
Porter explained that three incidents happened shortly after the meeting between Bernhardt and Ingram. The Army Corp. of Engineers reportedly announced they are reopening the permit process for an area in Arizona that was previously designated to be environmentally sensitive. At the same time, Ingram and several business acquaintances donated almost $250,000 to the Trump Victory Fund and the Republican National Committee.
After the donation was made, a high-ranking official from Fish and Wildlife received a call telling them that a “high-level politico” wanted them to reverse their decision that the development of the said person was deemed environmentally harmful. Porter said that the instances appear to be a quid pro quo situation as the real estate developer and his associates received favors after they donated to Trump’s Victory Fund.
“New from @RepRaulGrijalva and me: After a real estate developer and his friends made $241,600 in campaign donations, the Trump Administration overruled local environmental experts to green light a development near an endangered river. We’re making a criminal referral for bribery,” tweeted Porter.
Meanwhile, Trump is still under investigation by the New York Attorney General. An appeals court in the state expressed skepticism towards the former president’s efforts to block the enforcement of the subpoena of attorney general Letitia James.
The panel of judges was apparently not convinced by the argument made by Trump’s legal team, citing that the civil probe was improper partly because it would complicate the former president’s right to invoke the 5th Amendment in a parallel criminal probe by the Manhattan District Attorney.
Justice Rolando Acosta apparently questioned whether the state judiciary has the authority to intervene in such an investigation on behalf of the former president.


Syria, Kurds and U.S. Race to Show Progress on SDF Integration Deal
U.S. and China Push for Ceasefire as Thailand–Cambodia Border Clashes Escalate
Jared Isaacman Confirmed as NASA Administrator, Becomes 15th Leader of U.S. Space Agency
Argentina Unions Rally Against Milei’s Labor Reform as Congress Debates Key Bill
Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools
Union-Aligned Investors Question Amazon, Walmart and Alphabet on Trump Immigration Policies
U.S. Initiates $11.1 Billion Arms Sale to Taiwan Amid Rising China Tensions
EU Delays Mercosur Free Trade Agreement Signing Amid Ukraine War Funding Talks
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review
U.S.-Russia Talks in Miami Raise Hopes for Potential Ukraine War Deal
Venezuela Seeks UN Security Council Meeting Over U.S. Oil Tanker Blockade
Dan Bongino to Step Down as FBI Deputy Director After Brief, Controversial Tenure
Trump Announces $1,776 Cash Bonus for U.S. Military Personnel Ahead of Christmas
Federal Appeals Court Allows Trump’s National Guard Deployment in Washington, D.C. to Continue
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy
Fernando Haddad Confirms He Will Not Run for Office in 2025, Signals Possible Exit as Brazil’s Finance Minister
U.S. House Advances GOP Healthcare Bill as ACA Subsidies Near Expiration 



