HiteJinro, a South Korean distiller company that makes soju and beer, is in hot water after it was allegedly caught changing the labels of its soju drink bottles. Local industry officials said that the company is doing this illegal act with the intention of misleading the consumers.
The officials said on Wednesday, Feb. 15, that HiteJinro replaced the labels of its Jinro Soju brand to make it appear that they are the brand's Zero Sugar version. In truth, the alcohol content of the drinks is 16.5% and definitely has some levels of sugar in them.
The Zero Sugar soju is said to be the newer type of clear alcoholic drink and has recently become very popular, especially in restaurants around Seoul. This has 16% of alcohol content, and it is different from the regular Jinro soju because their ingredients are not the same.
Moreover, The Korea Times reported that, unlike the original version, Zero Sugar has no fructose and only contains artificial sweeteners. This was created for drinkers who want to avoid sugar.
It was suggested that due to its rising popularity, the demand for the product is quite high, but the production may be slow. This may have prompted HiteJinro to just change the label to meet the demand and sell more since it has stocks of the original soju.
The publication mentioned that the act of putting on a false label on products is a clear violation of the country's Article 8 of the Act on Labeling and Advertising of Food. Offenders can end up in jail for up to five years or be fined up to KRW50 million or about $38,971.
Meanwhile, HiteJinro issued a statement regarding the allegation and denied it has intentionally changed the labels of its regular soju brand. The company explained that the mislabeling of the bottles was a complete mistake that was committed by its sales personnel who was working part-time.
HiteJinro further said the employee only replaced the front labels, and the back labels remained. This means that the information about ingredients that show sugar content was still displayed despite the error on the front label.
"We intended to change the labels only for sugar-free products as the previous one showed the 'Zero Sugar' phrase too small on the front label," a company official stated. "Our sales personnel didn't do it intentionally. It was a mistake."
Photo by: Javier Esteban/Unsplash


Yen Slides as Japan Election Boosts Fiscal Stimulus Expectations
Innovent Biologics Shares Rally on New Eli Lilly Oncology and Immunology Deal
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge
Asian Currencies Stay Rangebound as Yen Firms on Intervention Talk
Asian Stocks Slip as Tech Rout Deepens, Japan Steadies Ahead of Election
Lee Seung-heon Signals Caution on Rate Hikes, Supports Higher Property Taxes to Cool Korea’s Housing Market
Anta Sports Expands Global Footprint With Strategic Puma Stake
Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
UK Starting Salaries See Strongest Growth in 18 Months as Hiring Sentiment Improves
Russian Stocks End Mixed as MOEX Index Closes Flat Amid Commodity Strength 



