Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges 
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand 
Biren Technology Targets Hong Kong IPO to Raise $300 Million Amid China’s AI Chip Push 
noyb Files GDPR Complaints Against TikTok, Grindr, and AppsFlyer Over Alleged Illegal Data Tracking. 
iRobot Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Rising Competition and Tariff Pressures 
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns 
Nvidia Weighs Expanding H200 AI Chip Production as China Demand Surges 
MetaX IPO Soars as China’s AI Chip Stocks Ignite Investor Frenzy 
SpaceX Edges Toward Landmark IPO as Elon Musk Confirms Plans 
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies 
Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National AI Regulation Standard 
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation 
Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law 
Oracle Stock Surges After Hours on TikTok Deal Optimism and OpenAI Fundraising Buzz 
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy 
It's probably not surprising at this point, but it’s worth noting anyway that a recent test of an artificial intelligence has confirmed that it is way better than humans in another important area of society: Law. Specifically, the AI was able to perform faster and with more accuracy when reviewing legal documents, handily trouncing its human counterparts.
The company responsible for this new development is LawGeex, a startup that aims to merge law and technology in ways never seen before, Futurism reports. The firm conducted a study that pitted an AI against 20 real lawyers in reviewing non-disclosure agreements, with the goal being to spot risks hidden in the legal jargon.
In terms of how the test was set up, this is basically the kind of event that lawyers deal with on a daily basis, where they look through documents to determine their validity and how the fine print will affect clients. As such, accuracy is immeasurably important in order to avoid problems.
By the end of the study, the AI proved to be 10 percent faster than the human lawyers, and considerably more accurate. This is based on an overall scale, though, and not by individual. As everyone should know, at this point, not all lawyers are the same.
For context, the average performance of the AI was 94 percent accuracy in identifying the risks. In comparison, the lawyers only scored 85 percent on average.
When looking at the extreme end of the spectrum, however, the best performers on the human side got 97 percent. That’s about as high as you could ask for. Then again, the AI did score 100 percent using the same parameters, which is telling in several ways.
In this particular instance, it’s been proven that a machine will outperform a human each and every time. Even more startling is the fact that in common practices, reviewing these kinds of legal documents won’t even be at the top of a lawyer’s to-do list. Having to do other things would reduce their performance considerably. The same can’t be said of an AI.
