SoftBank Shares Drop as OpenAI Losses and Rising Costs Spark Investor Concerns 
Trump Says Anthropic No Longer Seen as National Security Threat 
US Raises Concerns Over Possible ASML EUV Machine Transfer to China 
Apple Signals Product Price Hikes Amid Rising Memory Chip Costs 
US-Iran De-Escalation Shifts Washington’s Focus to AI Regulation and Crypto Legislation 
Kingboard Holdings Shares Surge After HK$11.77 Billion Block Trade to Expand PCB and AI Supply Chain Business 
Baseten Secures $1.5 Billion Funding at $13 Billion Valuation Amid AI Infrastructure Boom 
John Jumper Leaves Google DeepMind for Anthropic Amid Intensifying AI Talent Race 
Chinese Social Media Giant Xiaohongshu Eyes Hong Kong IPO at Over $70 Billion Valuation 
SpaceX Stock Plunges 16% as KeyBanc Warns Valuation May Be Overstretched 
SpaceX Stock Slides After IPO Rally as Valuation Concerns Grow 
Trump’s Quantum Push Lifts IBM Stock as CEO Arvind Krishna Receives White House Praise 
Today’s space race could turn fatal if we don’t agree on new rules 
Oracle Cuts 21,000 Jobs as AI Reshapes Workforce and Cloud Expansion Accelerates 
Trump Administration Delays DeepSeek and CXMT Trade Blacklist Designations Amid U.S.-China Tensions 
It's probably not surprising at this point, but it’s worth noting anyway that a recent test of an artificial intelligence has confirmed that it is way better than humans in another important area of society: Law. Specifically, the AI was able to perform faster and with more accuracy when reviewing legal documents, handily trouncing its human counterparts.
The company responsible for this new development is LawGeex, a startup that aims to merge law and technology in ways never seen before, Futurism reports. The firm conducted a study that pitted an AI against 20 real lawyers in reviewing non-disclosure agreements, with the goal being to spot risks hidden in the legal jargon.
In terms of how the test was set up, this is basically the kind of event that lawyers deal with on a daily basis, where they look through documents to determine their validity and how the fine print will affect clients. As such, accuracy is immeasurably important in order to avoid problems.
By the end of the study, the AI proved to be 10 percent faster than the human lawyers, and considerably more accurate. This is based on an overall scale, though, and not by individual. As everyone should know, at this point, not all lawyers are the same.
For context, the average performance of the AI was 94 percent accuracy in identifying the risks. In comparison, the lawyers only scored 85 percent on average.
When looking at the extreme end of the spectrum, however, the best performers on the human side got 97 percent. That’s about as high as you could ask for. Then again, the AI did score 100 percent using the same parameters, which is telling in several ways.
In this particular instance, it’s been proven that a machine will outperform a human each and every time. Even more startling is the fact that in common practices, reviewing these kinds of legal documents won’t even be at the top of a lawyer’s to-do list. Having to do other things would reduce their performance considerably. The same can’t be said of an AI.
