CK Hutchison Seeks $1.5 Billion From Panama Over Canal Ports 
Rodrigo Duterte Makes First Public Appearance at ICC in 18 Months 
Hyundai Delays In-House ADAS, Turns to Nvidia 
Rosenblatt Starts Nokia at Buy on AI Networking Growth 
Cyber attacks? Bioterrorism? To ‘Pace the Frontier’ of AI effectively, we must improve our anticipatory thinking 
American Airlines Eyes Capacity Cuts as High Fuel Prices Persist 
Z.AI Shares Slide 7% After $5 Billion Fundraising 
LVMH-Hermès Dispute Deepens Over Secret 2002 Share Deal 
29 US states are suing Meta. What might it mean for the rest of the world? 
Qualcomm Gains on $60B Amazon AI Chip Deal 
Sara Duterte Posts Bail Over Grave Threats Case 
Physicists zoom into the birth of cosmic rainstorms with new CERN study 
SK Hynix, Intel Discuss U.S. Memory Chip Production Deal 
SEC Seeks ISS Client Voting Records in Proxy Adviser Probe 
Trump Rejects Calls for Tougher AI Regulation 
France Urges Faster AI Push Despite Safety Risks 
Cathie Wood Backs AI Slowdown as Safety Concerns Grow 
Add as a preferred source on Google
A New Delhi court ruled that Reliance Industries' deal to purchase local rival Future Retail for $3.3 billion should be put on to protect the rights of Amazon, who objected to it last year.
The court ordered all parties involved in the deal to "maintain status quo" pending its final judgment.
Future Retail vowed to take appropriate steps and explore all legal remedies to pursue the Reliance deal.
At stake is strategic access to a network of popular grocery stores and retail shops in India.
Amazon invested in a Future Group entity that gave it a stake of roughly 4.8 percent in Future Retail as of September 30 last year. The deal also gave Amazon a right of first refusal in the sales of Future Retail shares.
According to Amazon, a 2019 deal with the Future Group entity included a non-compete clause, which listed 30 parties with which Future Retail and Future Group could not do business with. The list included Reliance.
The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) emergency arbitrator ordered a temporary halt to the deal last October.
The Future Group questioned the validity of the SIAC arbitration order in India, but the Delhi High Court it "enforceable."
