A federal appeals court on Monday denied the Trump administration's request to revoke temporary legal protections for nearly 400,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston upheld a lower court’s decision blocking the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from ending a two-year humanitarian parole program originally implemented under President Joe Biden.
The parole program allows certain migrants to live and work legally in the U.S. temporarily. DHS, under Secretary Kristi Noem, had sought to cancel the program without case-by-case review, arguing it retained full discretion and that the court’s order compelled the U.S. to keep "hundreds of thousands of aliens" in the country.
However, the three-judge panel, all appointed by Democratic presidents, ruled that DHS had not demonstrated a strong likelihood of success in its appeal. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani had previously found the administration’s broad cancellation of work permits and legal status unlawful, saying it bypassed individual review and misinterpreted immigration law.
Immigrant advocacy groups, including the Justice Action Center, praised the court’s decision, calling the administration’s move both “reckless and illegal.” The ruling keeps in place protections for migrants who would have otherwise faced sudden deportation.
DHS had issued a Federal Register notice on March 25 announcing the termination of Biden-era humanitarian parole, which had covered migrants fleeing crisis zones. The administration may now appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Despite the legal setback, a DHS spokesperson reaffirmed the administration’s commitment to strict immigration enforcement, stating, “No lawsuit...is going to stop us from restoring the rule of law.”
This case highlights the escalating legal and political battle over U.S. immigration policy ahead of the 2024 election.


U.S.-China Trade Talks Resume in Paris Amid Rising Global Tensions
U.S. Oil Executives Warn Trump Administration of Worsening Energy Crisis Amid Strait of Hormuz Disruptions
Trump Seeks Global Coalition to Reopen Strait of Hormuz Amid U.S.-Israel-Iran Conflict
Anthropic Sues Pentagon Over AI Blacklist, Citing Free Speech Violations
JD Vance Backs Trump's Iran War Strategy Despite Known Anti-War Stance
Estée Lauder Sues Jo Malone Over Trademark Dispute Involving Zara
ICE Arrests Colombian Journalist in Tennessee, Trump Administration Says She Will Receive Due Process
Ukraine Peace Talks Delayed as U.S. Cites Middle East Tensions
SEC Eyes Shift to Semiannual Corporate Reporting, Ending 50-Year Quarterly Mandate
Hamas Urges Iran to Spare Neighboring Countries Amid Regional Escalation
Microsoft Backs Anthropic in Legal Fight Against Pentagon's AI Blacklist
Taiwan Confident U.S. Arms Sale Review Remains on Track Despite Trump's China Trip Delay
Jerome Powell May Stay on Fed Board Amid Criminal Investigation, Court Documents Reveal
Meta Encryption Plan Sparks Child Safety Concerns Amid New Mexico Lawsuit
Federal Judge Blocks Virginia Social Media Age Verification Law Over First Amendment Concerns
California Court Rejects xAI Bid to Block AI Data Transparency Law
Does international law still matter? The strike on the girls’ school in Iran shows why we need it 



