The Wall Street Journal recently reported Beijing’s decision to ban the sale of “iPhone 6” units in the city because of design disputes with a local phone manufacturer. This is the latest in a series of harassment practices that China has been directing at “Apple,” which reportedly contributed to the abysmal sales performance of the tech giant.
The issue stemmed from the similarities that two of “Apple’s” “iPhone 6” units shared with that of “100C” smartphone by “Shenzhen Beili” in terms of design. “Shenzhen Beili” is a small smartphone company and has nowhere near the global market share that “Apple” has, but China is known for often favoring local companies whenever a legal dispute arises involving international brands.
However, the Independent reported that the administrative order has been put on hold, which means that “Apple” could still keep selling the “iPhone” units in question. Unfortunately, media coverage of the issue painted the incident with more unsettling implications than what the company thought was warranted, thus leading to consequences pertaining to stock prices and investor confidence.
Chuck Jones over at Forbes covered “Apple’s” investment week and the effects that the issue has had on the company’s performance. As expected, share prices are down by 3.5 percent and performance with both S&P and NASDAQ was poor at 1.2 and 1.9 percent respectively.
The tech giant has been experiencing some difficulty maintaining the level of stability of late that they enjoyed for over a decade thanks to the combination of factors like China’s attitude towards the company, waning user interest, and even intensifying competition. Just last April, billionaire investor Carl Icahn sold his shares in “Apple” because he was afraid of the consequences wrought by China’s aggression.
Even with the staying of the administrative order to halt “iPhone 6” sales after “Apple” filed an appeal, Jones still presses the point that this just another example of how the government agencies in China can toy with the American company whenever they want. The only reason why these agencies are not overtly trying to ban “Apple’s” products altogether is how it will affect Chinese workers as well.


OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge
Elon Musk’s SpaceX Acquires xAI in Historic Deal Uniting Space and Artificial Intelligence
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links
Elon Musk’s Empire: SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI Merger Talks Spark Investor Debate
Palantir Stock Jumps After Strong Q4 Earnings Beat and Upbeat 2026 Revenue Forecast
Oracle Plans $45–$50 Billion Funding Push in 2026 to Expand Cloud and AI Infrastructure
SoftBank and Intel Partner to Develop Next-Generation Memory Chips for AI Data Centers
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 



