The Wall Street Journal recently reported Beijing’s decision to ban the sale of “iPhone 6” units in the city because of design disputes with a local phone manufacturer. This is the latest in a series of harassment practices that China has been directing at “Apple,” which reportedly contributed to the abysmal sales performance of the tech giant.
The issue stemmed from the similarities that two of “Apple’s” “iPhone 6” units shared with that of “100C” smartphone by “Shenzhen Beili” in terms of design. “Shenzhen Beili” is a small smartphone company and has nowhere near the global market share that “Apple” has, but China is known for often favoring local companies whenever a legal dispute arises involving international brands.
However, the Independent reported that the administrative order has been put on hold, which means that “Apple” could still keep selling the “iPhone” units in question. Unfortunately, media coverage of the issue painted the incident with more unsettling implications than what the company thought was warranted, thus leading to consequences pertaining to stock prices and investor confidence.
Chuck Jones over at Forbes covered “Apple’s” investment week and the effects that the issue has had on the company’s performance. As expected, share prices are down by 3.5 percent and performance with both S&P and NASDAQ was poor at 1.2 and 1.9 percent respectively.
The tech giant has been experiencing some difficulty maintaining the level of stability of late that they enjoyed for over a decade thanks to the combination of factors like China’s attitude towards the company, waning user interest, and even intensifying competition. Just last April, billionaire investor Carl Icahn sold his shares in “Apple” because he was afraid of the consequences wrought by China’s aggression.
Even with the staying of the administrative order to halt “iPhone 6” sales after “Apple” filed an appeal, Jones still presses the point that this just another example of how the government agencies in China can toy with the American company whenever they want. The only reason why these agencies are not overtly trying to ban “Apple’s” products altogether is how it will affect Chinese workers as well.


Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Plans China Visit Amid AI Chip Market Uncertainty
California Attorney General Orders xAI to Halt Illegal Grok Deepfake Imagery
Apple China Holiday Sale Offers Discounts Up to 1,000 Yuan on Popular Devices
HKEX’s Permissive IPO Rules Could Open Opportunities for Korea to Strengthen Its Position in International Listings
Ericsson Plans SEK 25 Billion Shareholder Returns as Margins Improve Despite Flat Network Market
TSMC Shares Hit Record High as AI Chip Demand Fuels Strong Q4 Earnings
Microsoft Restores Microsoft 365 Services After Widespread Outage
Baidu Shares Surge After Official Launch of Advanced Ernie 5.0 AI Model
TikTok Expands AI Age-Detection Technology Across Europe Amid Rising Regulatory Pressure
OpenAI Launches Stargate Community Plan to Offset Energy Costs and Support Local Power Infrastructure
Intel Stock Slides Despite Earnings Beat as Weak Q1 Outlook Raises Concerns
Tesla Plans FSD Subscription Price Hikes as Autonomous Capabilities Advance
Morgan Stanley Flags High Volatility Ahead for Tesla Stock on Robotaxi and AI Updates
China Halts Shipments of Nvidia H200 AI Chips, Forcing Suppliers to Pause Production
Global DRAM Chip Shortage Puts Automakers Under New Cost and Supply Pressure 



