The legal disputes between Apple and South Korean rival Samsung have been going on for so long and for so many times, publications are actually losing count. The two companies are once again going to court in order to argue what patent infringements were committed and how much Samsung really needs to pay Apple. It’s surprising that the legal bills have not matched the damage fees yet.
Both companies will be butting heads once they have determined a retrial date, which needs to be decided on Wednesday, Mac Rumors reports. This follows the order of U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh who decided on Sunday that the $399 million previously awarded to Apple is now up for re-determination.
"The Court finds that the jury instructions given at trial did not accurately reflect the law and that the instructions prejudiced Samsung by precluding the jury from considering whether the relevant article of manufacture ... was something other than the entire phone," Judge Koh ordered.
The retrial is actually made possible by the U.S. Supreme Court, which decided last December that the amount was up for reconsideration, CNET reports. This is in support of Samsung’s argument that the amount it owes Apple should be determined by individual components instead of the entire revenue earned with its smartphone.
"This is a historic opportunity to determine how the US Supreme Court's guidance on design patent damages will be implemented in our case and future cases," Samsung’s statement reads.
It’s worth pointing out that there were some patent infringements committed on Samsung’s part, there’s no question about that now. However, the South Korean giant still argued that it only owed Apple part of its revenue, not all of it.
The original asking fee was actually $1 billion, but it was eventually reduced to $399 million. Now, Apple might get even less than that from Samsung.


SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters
U.S. Greenlights Nvidia H200 Chip Exports to China With 25% Fee
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies
Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges
iRobot Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Rising Competition and Tariff Pressures
Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National AI Regulation Standard
China Adds Domestic AI Chips to Government Procurement List as U.S. Considers Easing Nvidia Export Curbs
Adobe Strengthens AI Strategy Ahead of Q4 Earnings, Says Stifel
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand
Australia Enforces World-First Social Media Age Limit as Global Regulation Looms
SK Hynix Labeled “Investment Warning Stock” After Extraordinary 200% Share Surge
Trump Criticizes EU’s €120 Million Fine on Elon Musk’s X Platform
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 



