TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Gold and Silver Prices Slide as Dollar Strength and Easing Tensions Weigh on Metals 
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure 
U.S. Stock Futures Edge Higher as Tech Rout Deepens on AI Concerns and Earnings 
Thailand Inflation Remains Negative for 10th Straight Month in January 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling 
Oil Prices Slip as U.S.–Iran Talks Ease Supply Disruption Fears 
Supreme Court Signals Doubts Over Trump’s Bid to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook 
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record 
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
Nvidia Nears $20 Billion OpenAI Investment as AI Funding Race Intensifies 
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns 
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors 
Dollar Steadies Ahead of ECB and BoE Decisions as Markets Turn Risk-Off 
The Seoul Central District Court ruled against customers who filed a lawsuit against the local unit of U.S. electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc., demanding reparations of 10 million won per person.
The plaintiffs claim that they incurred losses as Tesla did not inform them that there would soon be a specifications upgrade at the time of their purchase.
The customers insist that Tesla's specifications upgrade was equivalent to the release of a new car and that the company should have notified them of such a plan.
The customers bought Tesla EVs in March 2019, a month before the carmaker announced the specifications upgrade.
The court, however, ruled that there was no evidence that Tesla explicitly said that it would not be releasing a new car.
The court added that the cars purchased had long been in the market, and there was media and consumer speculation of an upgrade in the works.
