IBM Nears $11 Billion Deal to Acquire Confluent in Major AI and Data Push 
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform 
SK Hynix Labeled “Investment Warning Stock” After Extraordinary 200% Share Surge 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
EssilorLuxottica Bets on AI-Powered Smart Glasses as Competition Intensifies 
Microsoft Unveils Massive Global AI Investments, Prioritizing India’s Rapidly Growing Digital Market 
SpaceX Edges Toward Landmark IPO as Elon Musk Confirms Plans 
Australia Enforces World-First Social Media Age Limit as Global Regulation Looms 
US Charges Two Men in Alleged Nvidia Chip Smuggling Scheme to China 
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies 
U.S. Greenlights Nvidia H200 Chip Exports to China With 25% Fee 
SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters 
Trump Criticizes EU’s €120 Million Fine on Elon Musk’s X Platform 
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand 
Nvidia Weighs Expanding H200 AI Chip Production as China Demand Surges 
Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges 
Fans of the Fallout series have their favorite installments, but many consider Fallout: New Vegas to be the best. The developer behind that particular game is Obsidian and in a recent interview, they revealed that the PlayStation 3 and the Xbox 360 limited the title in ways the PC would not have. What’s more, it seems the many bugs found in the game were due to how expensive they were to fix.
Obsidian made the confession when the developers spoke with interviewers from PCGamesN, with lead world builder Scott Everts saying that it would have been much better if it was made only for the PC. Apparently, the release of New Vegas for consoles forced the developers to scrap many of their original ideas in order to cram whatever stuff they could into the limited hardware.
Everts’ comments mirrored much of what many hardcore New Vegas fans noticed in the game, where the towns and bases were somewhat decentralized. It was almost as if the developers merely placed everything in odd locations at random. Apparently, this is not what the developers had in mind.
“We had a lot of plans early on. Like, ‘Here’s where the water is stored, here’s where the farms are, here’s where the government is centralised’. We had it all planned out - it wasn’t just a bunch of random stuff,” he said.
Even though Obsidian clearly had to make huge compromises, the game still came out great, at least when considering what they had to work with. However, Everts stresses that it could have been so much better. While Bethesda properties are known for the virulent presence of bugs, Comicbook.com noted, it could have apparently been so much less pronounced in New Vegas.
“We would have had fewer performance issues. We did break it up a bit, but from my point of view it was a performance-related game and we had to fix things,” he said.
Despite these complaints, however, it’s clear that the developers had fun creating the game. In fact, they had repeatedly said that they would relish another opportunity to work on a Fallout game.
