A federal appeals court has blocked a Trump administration initiative that would have required hospitals serving low-income Americans to pay full prices upfront for certain high-cost prescription drugs before receiving rebates later, marking a significant development in U.S. healthcare and drug pricing policy.
On Wednesday, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request from President Donald Trump’s administration to pause an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maine. That injunction halted a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) program that would have fundamentally changed how safety-net hospitals purchase some of the most expensive medications covered under Medicare drug price negotiations.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Hospital Association (AHA) along with several healthcare providers, who argued that the new drug pricing model represented a sudden and harmful departure from decades of established policy. Under the long-standing 340B Drug Pricing Program, drugmakers have been required to offer upfront discounts to hospitals that serve vulnerable and low-income populations. The hospitals warned that replacing upfront discounts with a rebate-based system would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs and strain already limited resources.
The blocked policy would have applied to the first 10 medications selected for Medicare price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, passed during President Joe Biden’s administration. These drugs include widely used treatments such as Eliquis, a blood thinner sold by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb; Xarelto, produced by Johnson & Johnson; and Merck & Co.’s diabetes drug Januvia.
HRSA argued that its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, announced in July, was designed to prevent drug manufacturers from providing duplicate discounts, which they are permitted to avoid under the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the pilot, manufacturers could charge hospitals wholesale prices and issue rebates afterward to align with negotiated Medicare prices.
However, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruled that HRSA failed to properly assess the impact of the rebate model on rural and safety-net hospitals, violating the Administrative Procedure Act. His December 29 injunction stopped the program from taking effect on January 1, a decision now upheld by the appeals court.


Trump and IRS in Settlement Talks Over $10 Billion Tax Return Leak Lawsuit
EU Approves New Sanctions on Israeli Settlers and Hamas Leaders
OpenAI-Microsoft Deal Sets $38 Billion Revenue-Sharing Cap Ahead of Potential IPO
Delcy Rodriguez Appears at ICJ Hearing Over Venezuela-Guyana Esequibo Dispute
Judge Rules DOGE Humanities Grant Cuts Unconstitutional
Justice Jackson Slams Supreme Court's Growing Use of Shadow Docket
Organon Stock Surges After Reports of $13 Billion Buyout Bid by Sun Pharma
Trump Administration Seeks Court Pause to Reinstate 10% Global Tariffs
Trump-Xi China Summit 2026: Trade Tensions, Taiwan, and Iran Take Center Stage
Democratic Attorneys General Sue Trump Administration Over CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule Changes
Judge Orders Release of Family After Longest ICE Detention Under Trump Administration
Malaysia Unveils Energy Security Plan Amid Iran Conflict and Rising Oil Costs
FDA Biologics Chief Vinay Prasad to Leave Agency in April Amid Policy Disputes
Supreme Court Asked to Reinstate Mail-Order Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone
Ibiden Stock Surges as AI Chip Demand Boosts Profit Outlook
US, Japan Reaffirm Strong Currency Coordination Amid Yen Volatility
Aung San Suu Kyi Moved to House Arrest Amid Myanmar Political Crisis 



