A federal appeals court has blocked a Trump administration initiative that would have required hospitals serving low-income Americans to pay full prices upfront for certain high-cost prescription drugs before receiving rebates later, marking a significant development in U.S. healthcare and drug pricing policy.
On Wednesday, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request from President Donald Trump’s administration to pause an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maine. That injunction halted a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) program that would have fundamentally changed how safety-net hospitals purchase some of the most expensive medications covered under Medicare drug price negotiations.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Hospital Association (AHA) along with several healthcare providers, who argued that the new drug pricing model represented a sudden and harmful departure from decades of established policy. Under the long-standing 340B Drug Pricing Program, drugmakers have been required to offer upfront discounts to hospitals that serve vulnerable and low-income populations. The hospitals warned that replacing upfront discounts with a rebate-based system would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs and strain already limited resources.
The blocked policy would have applied to the first 10 medications selected for Medicare price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, passed during President Joe Biden’s administration. These drugs include widely used treatments such as Eliquis, a blood thinner sold by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb; Xarelto, produced by Johnson & Johnson; and Merck & Co.’s diabetes drug Januvia.
HRSA argued that its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, announced in July, was designed to prevent drug manufacturers from providing duplicate discounts, which they are permitted to avoid under the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the pilot, manufacturers could charge hospitals wholesale prices and issue rebates afterward to align with negotiated Medicare prices.
However, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruled that HRSA failed to properly assess the impact of the rebate model on rural and safety-net hospitals, violating the Administrative Procedure Act. His December 29 injunction stopped the program from taking effect on January 1, a decision now upheld by the appeals court.


Baker Hughes Sells Waygate Technologies to Hexagon for $1.45 Billion
RFK Jr. Expands CDC Vaccine Advisory Panel's Scope Amid Legal Battles
Swalwell Drops California Governor Bid Amid Sexual Assault Allegations
Qantas Raises Fuel Cost Forecast Amid Middle East Oil Crisis
Trump Nominates Korean-American Michelle Steel as U.S. Ambassador to South Korea
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute
United Airlines Eyes Merger with American Airlines in Potential Industry-Shaping Deal
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict
Novo Nordisk Warns of Profit Decline as Wegovy Faces U.S. Price Pressure and Rising Competition
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy
DOJ Launches Antitrust Investigation Into the NFL Over Broadcast Restrictions
Spain's Sanchez Visits China to Deepen Trade Ties Amid U.S. Tensions
AI Deradicalization Tools: How Chatbots Could Help Combat Violent Extremism Online
Novartis’ Vanrafia Shows Strong Phase 3 Results in IgA Nephropathy, Paving Way for Full Approval
Viking Therapeutics Sees Growing Strategic Interest in $150 Billion Weight-Loss Drug Market
Vanda Pharmaceuticals (VNDA) Stock Soars After FDA Approves BYSANTI for Bipolar I and Schizophrenia
Annie Altman Amends Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman 



