A federal appeals court has blocked a Trump administration initiative that would have required hospitals serving low-income Americans to pay full prices upfront for certain high-cost prescription drugs before receiving rebates later, marking a significant development in U.S. healthcare and drug pricing policy.
On Wednesday, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request from President Donald Trump’s administration to pause an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maine. That injunction halted a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) program that would have fundamentally changed how safety-net hospitals purchase some of the most expensive medications covered under Medicare drug price negotiations.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Hospital Association (AHA) along with several healthcare providers, who argued that the new drug pricing model represented a sudden and harmful departure from decades of established policy. Under the long-standing 340B Drug Pricing Program, drugmakers have been required to offer upfront discounts to hospitals that serve vulnerable and low-income populations. The hospitals warned that replacing upfront discounts with a rebate-based system would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs and strain already limited resources.
The blocked policy would have applied to the first 10 medications selected for Medicare price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, passed during President Joe Biden’s administration. These drugs include widely used treatments such as Eliquis, a blood thinner sold by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb; Xarelto, produced by Johnson & Johnson; and Merck & Co.’s diabetes drug Januvia.
HRSA argued that its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, announced in July, was designed to prevent drug manufacturers from providing duplicate discounts, which they are permitted to avoid under the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the pilot, manufacturers could charge hospitals wholesale prices and issue rebates afterward to align with negotiated Medicare prices.
However, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruled that HRSA failed to properly assess the impact of the rebate model on rural and safety-net hospitals, violating the Administrative Procedure Act. His December 29 injunction stopped the program from taking effect on January 1, a decision now upheld by the appeals court.


Meta Encryption Plan Sparks Child Safety Concerns Amid New Mexico Lawsuit
FedEx Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Tariff Refunds After Supreme Court Ruling
Denver Mayor Orders Police to Protect Protesters, Restricts ICE Access to City Property
RFK Jr. Overhauls Federal Autism Panel, Sparking Medical Community Backlash
Trump Floats “Friendly Takeover” of Cuba as Rubio Reportedly Engages in Talks
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s $600 Million Public Health Funding Cuts to Democratic-Led States
Panama Cancels CK Hutchison Port Contracts, Grants Temporary Control to Maersk and MSC
Merck Raises Growth Outlook, Targets $70 Billion Revenue From New Drugs by Mid-2030s
Sanofi to Acquire Dynavax in $2.2 Billion Deal to Strengthen Vaccines Portfolio
Nintendo Share Sale: MUFG and Bank of Kyoto to Sell Stakes in Strategic Unwinding
Argentina Senate Approves Bill to Lower Age of Criminal Responsibility to 14
Pentagon to Halt Ivy League Programs for U.S. Military Officers Starting 2026
Trump Orders Federal Agencies to Halt Use of Anthropic AI Technology
Toyota Plans $19 Billion Share Sale in Major Corporate Governance Reform Move
Hyundai Motor Group to Invest $6.26 Billion in AI Data Center, Robotics and Renewable Energy Projects in South Korea
Novo Nordisk Shares Tumble After CagriSema Misses Key Trial Endpoint
Dominican Republic Unveils Massive Rare Earth Deposits to Boost High-Tech and Energy Sectors 



