Matthew Wale Elected Solomon Islands Prime Minister After No-Confidence Vote 
Bolsonaro Discharged After Shoulder Surgery Amid Ongoing Legal Troubles 
Russia Launches Massive Drone Attack on Ukraine, NATO Allies Respond 
Pentagon Halts Planned U.S. Troop Deployment to Poland Amid Europe Force Review 
Japan Considers Extra Budget Aid Amid Rising Fuel and Utility Costs 
RFK Jr. Spokesman Resigns Over Trump Administration’s Flavored E-Cigarette Policy 
Taiwan Independence Debate: China, U.S., and Taipei Tensions Explained 
US Hosts Israel-Lebanon Talks as Ceasefire Deadline Nears 
Judge Rules Use of Military Lawyers in Civilian Prosecutions Is Lawful 
US Plans Imminent Indictment of Cuba’s Raul Castro Over 1996 Plane Shootdown 
Comey Faces Charges Over Instagram Post as Free Speech Debate Intensifies 
Argentina Court Upholds Cristina Kirchner Asset Seizure in Corruption Case 
Judge Delays SEC Settlement With Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Disclosure Case 
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice 
Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang Pleads Guilty in China Foreign Agent Case 
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
Three major federal worker unions have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming that a newly added question in federal job applications violates the U.S. Constitution. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and the National Association of Government Employees (NAGE) jointly sued the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in federal court in Boston, arguing that the question unlawfully tests political loyalty.
The lawsuit targets a hiring reform implemented by OPM following a January executive order by President Donald Trump aimed at “restoring merit” to federal hiring. As part of the change, applicants are asked to respond to four essay questions—one of which the unions say is partisan. The controversial prompt asks: “How would you help advance the President’s Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role?” Applicants must also cite specific executive orders or policies they would support.
Union leaders argue this question forces job seekers to demonstrate political agreement with the president to be considered for employment, undermining the nonpartisan foundation of the federal workforce. AFGE President Everett Kelley condemned the move, calling it “illegal” and warning it could erode opportunities for skilled workers who serve without political bias.
OPM Director Scott Kupor, however, defended the process, stating the essay questions are optional and that political or ideological beliefs are not factors in hiring. He maintained that the hiring plan prohibits ideological tests and preserves the apolitical nature of government service.
The unions’ lawsuit asserts that the OPM’s directive infringes on First Amendment free-speech rights and violates the Privacy Act by conditioning federal employment on political conformity. The outcome could shape future standards for merit-based hiring in the U.S. civil service.
