Appeals Court Blocks Expansion of Fast-Track Deportations in the U.S. 
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup 
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 
Dollar Holds Steady as Markets Shift Focus to 2026 Rate Cut Expectations 
Meta Accused of Halting Internal Research on Mental Health Risks of Facebook and Instagram 
Citi Sets Bullish 2026 Target for STOXX 600 as Fiscal Support and Monetary Easing Boost Outlook 
Europe Confronts Rising Competitive Pressure as China Accelerates Export-Led Growth 
IKEA Expands U.S. Manufacturing Amid Rising Tariffs and Supply Chain Strategy Shift 
ExxonMobil to Shut Older Singapore Steam Cracker Amid Global Petrochemical Downturn 
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case 
China Urged to Prioritize Economy Over Territorial Ambitions, Says Taiwan’s President Lai 
CFPB Reaches $1.75 Million Settlement with MoneyLion Over Military Loan Overcharges 
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation 
Oil Prices Rise as Ukraine Targets Russian Energy Infrastructure 
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder 
Why a ‘rip-off’ degree might be worth the money after all – research study 
Netflix Nearing Major Deal to Acquire Warner Bros Discovery Assets 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
