The pandemic is still disrupting young people’s careers 
DOJ Backs Jeanine Pirro-Led Investigation Into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell 
Booked to travel through the Middle East? Here’s why you shouldn’t cancel your flight 
Anthropic Sues Pentagon Over AI Blacklist, Citing Free Speech Violations 
Columbia Student Mahmoud Khalil Fights Arrest as Deportation Case Moves to New Jersey 
Brazil Meat Exports Weather Iran War Disruptions With Rerouted Shipments 
Britain has almost 1 million young people not in work or education – here’s what evidence shows can change that 
Bank of America's $72.5M Epstein Settlement: What You Need to Know 
Goldman Sachs Sees Value in European Real Estate Stocks Despite Sharp Selloff 
Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages 
NAB Plans to Cut 170 Jobs While Expanding Offshore Operations 
Microsoft Backs Anthropic in Legal Fight Against Pentagon's AI Blacklist 
WTO Digital Trade Moratorium Expires Amid Stalled Negotiations 
Ukrainian Drones and the #MadeByHousewives Movement: Kyiv Fires Back at Rheinmetall CEO 
The ghost of Robodebt – Federal Court rules billions of dollars in welfare debts must be recalculated 
Asian Currencies Hold Steady Amid U.S.-Israel-Iran Tensions and BOJ Signals 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
