Trump Threatens Aircraft Tariffs as U.S.-Canada Jet Certification Dispute Escalates 
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case 
Tesla Launches New Model Y Variant in the US Starting at $41,990 
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations 
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer 
Oracle Plans $45–$50 Billion Funding Push in 2026 to Expand Cloud and AI Infrastructure 
Jensen Huang Urges Taiwan Suppliers to Boost AI Chip Production Amid Surging Demand 
AI is driving down the price of knowledge – universities have to rethink what they offer 
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors 
Indian Rupee Strengthens Sharply After U.S.-India Trade Deal Announcement 
NRW Holdings Shares Surge After Securing Major Rio Tinto Contract and New Project Wins 
South Korea Factory Activity Hits 18-Month High as Export Demand Surges 
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines 
India Budget 2025 Highlights Manufacturing Push but Falls Short of Market Expectations 
Asian Markets Slide as Silver Volatility, Earnings Season, and Central Bank Meetings Rattle Investors 
SpaceX Seeks FCC Approval for Massive Solar-Powered Satellite Network to Support AI Data Centers 
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
