Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages 
Time to buy local: war fuel price shocks reveal the folly of a long food supply chain 
Will a new border deal with the US open a backdoor into Kiwis’ personal data? 
Uranium Bull Market Gains Momentum Amid Supply Deficits and Geopolitical Tensions 
Oil Prices Slip as U.S.-Iran Tensions and Ceasefire Uncertainty Weigh on Markets 
SK Hynix Launches 192GB SOCAMM2 Memory for Nvidia’s Next-Gen AI Chips 
Glastonbury is as popular than ever, but complaints about the lineup reveal its generational challenge 
Why a ‘rip-off’ degree might be worth the money after all – research study 
This fuel crisis could last for a while. It’s time for a new approach to fuel use - end it 
USMCA Talks Set to Resume as Mexico Signals New Round of Trade Negotiations 
Oil Prices Surge Amid Middle East Tensions as Global Markets React Cautiously 
Trump Pardon Clears Juan Orlando Hernández as U.S. Court Dismisses Drug Conviction Appeal 
Why financial hardship is more likely if you’re disabled or sick 
Want to cut your energy bills? Here’s how five experts are doing it 
Rising Jet Fuel Costs from Iran Conflict Push Airfare Higher Across Europe 
KOSPI Hits Record High as AI Chip Demand Lifts SK Hynix and Samsung Stocks 
Google promotes ‘teacher approved’ apps for kids. Here’s what parents should know 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
