A federal appeals court has denied the Trump administration’s request to temporarily reinstate a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, marking another legal setback for the administration’s immigration policy targeting highly skilled foreign workers.
On Friday, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston refused to pause a lower court ruling that blocked the controversial fee. The three-judge panel concluded that the Trump administration had not demonstrated it was likely to succeed in overturning the earlier decision, which found the fee exceeded presidential authority.
The ruling leaves in place a June 8 decision by a federal judge, who sided with a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic state attorneys general. The judge determined that the $100,000 charge functioned as an unlawful tax that Congress had never authorized.
President Donald Trump introduced the fee through a September proclamation, dramatically increasing the cost of obtaining new H-1B visas. The H-1B program is widely used by U.S. technology companies and other employers to recruit highly skilled foreign professionals in fields such as engineering, software development, healthcare, and research.
Under the existing H-1B system, employers typically pay between $2,000 and $5,000 in government filing fees, depending on several factors. The program issues 65,000 new visas annually, with an additional 20,000 visas reserved for applicants holding advanced degrees. Approved workers are generally authorized to remain in the United States for three to six years.
When announcing the new fee, Trump argued that the H-1B program had been exploited by employers to replace American workers with lower-paid foreign labor rather than supplement the domestic workforce.
The fee, however, did not apply to foreign nationals already in the United States on student visas, a group that historically represents a significant portion of new H-1B recipients.
Since the policy took effect, relatively few employers have paid the $100,000 fee, reflecting the uncertainty surrounding its legality and the ongoing court challenges.
The White House did not immediately comment on Friday’s appeals court decision, while the administration continues its effort to defend the policy through the legal process.


Maduro Seeks Dismissal of US Drug Trafficking Charges
France Targets Shein, Temu With Fast-Fashion Fees
Judge Rejects Minnesota Bid to Force ICE Agent Extradition
Sun Pharma Wins U.S. Appeal in Pfizer Lipitor Antitrust Case
Trump Touts $5,000 Checks if Republicans Win Congress
US Judge Dismisses Imran Ahmed Deportation Lawsuit
US Bans Canadian Alcohol, Motorcycles as Trade War Escalates
Trump Administration Pauses Visa Appointments Worldwide
China to Push Global Security Vision at Xiangshan Forum
Brazil Court Suspends Sigma Lithium Mine Operations
US Court Approves airBaltic Chapter 11 Restructuring
SEC Sues Former Tricolor Executives Over $1.9 Billion Investor Fraud Scheme
Texas Republicans Turn Against AI Data Centers as Election Backlash Grows
Google Changes EU Spam Policy Amid Antitrust Scrutiny
Ukraine Races to Counter Russia’s Faster Jet-Powered Drones
Sweden Election: Centre-Left Holds Narrow Lead
UK PM Andy Burnham Set for First Trump Meeting in New York 



