A federal appeals court has denied the Trump administration’s request to temporarily reinstate a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, marking another legal setback for the administration’s immigration policy targeting highly skilled foreign workers.
On Friday, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston refused to pause a lower court ruling that blocked the controversial fee. The three-judge panel concluded that the Trump administration had not demonstrated it was likely to succeed in overturning the earlier decision, which found the fee exceeded presidential authority.
The ruling leaves in place a June 8 decision by a federal judge, who sided with a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic state attorneys general. The judge determined that the $100,000 charge functioned as an unlawful tax that Congress had never authorized.
President Donald Trump introduced the fee through a September proclamation, dramatically increasing the cost of obtaining new H-1B visas. The H-1B program is widely used by U.S. technology companies and other employers to recruit highly skilled foreign professionals in fields such as engineering, software development, healthcare, and research.
Under the existing H-1B system, employers typically pay between $2,000 and $5,000 in government filing fees, depending on several factors. The program issues 65,000 new visas annually, with an additional 20,000 visas reserved for applicants holding advanced degrees. Approved workers are generally authorized to remain in the United States for three to six years.
When announcing the new fee, Trump argued that the H-1B program had been exploited by employers to replace American workers with lower-paid foreign labor rather than supplement the domestic workforce.
The fee, however, did not apply to foreign nationals already in the United States on student visas, a group that historically represents a significant portion of new H-1B recipients.
Since the policy took effect, relatively few employers have paid the $100,000 fee, reflecting the uncertainty surrounding its legality and the ongoing court challenges.
The White House did not immediately comment on Friday’s appeals court decision, while the administration continues its effort to defend the policy through the legal process.


Amish Shah Wins Arizona Democratic Primary in Key U.S. House Race
New Mexico AG Accuses DOJ of Delaying Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Investigation
Iran Rejects U.S.-Backed Ceasefire as Trump Escalates Military Threats, Oil Tops $100
Trump Education Department Removes Disparate Impact Rules, Sparking Civil Rights Backlash
Trump Administration Launches AI Cybersecurity Partnership to Protect Critical Infrastructure
Trump Orders Warning Signs Outside Smithsonian Museum Over ‘Anti-American’ Exhibits
Domino’s Weighs Appeal After Australian Court Rules Workers Were Misled on Pay
Trump Says No Decision on Major Iran Strikes as U.S.-Tehran Talks Intensify
Canada Vows Trade Fight as Trump Imposes 50% Tariffs
US Investigates Moonshot Over Alleged Use of Advanced AI Chips and IP Theft
DOJ Subpoenas Major Law Firms in Trump Executive Order Dispute
Trump Orders Section 301 Probe Into EU Tech Fines, Signals New Tariffs
Meta Says States Seek $1.4 Trillion in Penalties Over Teen Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
Trump to Deliver ‘Unifying Yet Vicious’ Speech at White House Correspondents’ Dinner Amid Heightened Security
FCC Moves to Ban Imports of Foreign Military-Grade Drones Over Security Risks
Trump Administration Imposes New Forced Labor Tariffs on 60 Trading Partners 



