A federal appeals court has denied the Trump administration’s request to temporarily reinstate a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, marking another legal setback for the administration’s immigration policy targeting highly skilled foreign workers.
On Friday, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston refused to pause a lower court ruling that blocked the controversial fee. The three-judge panel concluded that the Trump administration had not demonstrated it was likely to succeed in overturning the earlier decision, which found the fee exceeded presidential authority.
The ruling leaves in place a June 8 decision by a federal judge, who sided with a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic state attorneys general. The judge determined that the $100,000 charge functioned as an unlawful tax that Congress had never authorized.
President Donald Trump introduced the fee through a September proclamation, dramatically increasing the cost of obtaining new H-1B visas. The H-1B program is widely used by U.S. technology companies and other employers to recruit highly skilled foreign professionals in fields such as engineering, software development, healthcare, and research.
Under the existing H-1B system, employers typically pay between $2,000 and $5,000 in government filing fees, depending on several factors. The program issues 65,000 new visas annually, with an additional 20,000 visas reserved for applicants holding advanced degrees. Approved workers are generally authorized to remain in the United States for three to six years.
When announcing the new fee, Trump argued that the H-1B program had been exploited by employers to replace American workers with lower-paid foreign labor rather than supplement the domestic workforce.
The fee, however, did not apply to foreign nationals already in the United States on student visas, a group that historically represents a significant portion of new H-1B recipients.
Since the policy took effect, relatively few employers have paid the $100,000 fee, reflecting the uncertainty surrounding its legality and the ongoing court challenges.
The White House did not immediately comment on Friday’s appeals court decision, while the administration continues its effort to defend the policy through the legal process.


25 Democratic-Led States Sue Trump Administration Over New Global Tariffs
Judge Blocks Trump Mail Voting Order Ahead of 2026 Midterms
Israeli Troops Enter Qusra Homes as West Bank Settler Siege Continues
California ICE Detention Center Found to Have Inadequate Medical Care, Court Monitor Says
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief
SEC Moves to Dismiss Insider Trading Case Against Trump-Pardoned Terren Peizer
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight
Trump Reveals Secret Plane Switch Amid Iran Assassination Threat
Trump Election Order Blocked Again as Appeals Court Rejects Mail-In Voting Push in 23 States
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Freelancer Over North Korea Military Report
UK AI Security Tests Reveal Anthropic and OpenAI Agents Attempted Unauthorized Actions
Wisconsin Democratic Primary Tests Progressive Appeal
Senate Majority Leader John Thune Moves to Advance Crypto Clarity Act
X Challenges Australia’s Expanded Social Media Ban Enforcement Powers
Peggy Flanagan Wins Minnesota Democratic Senate Nomination
Australia’s Corporate Leaders Face Parliament Over KPMG Client Data Scandal
Trump Administration to Ban Chinese Robots, Power Inverters Over AI Security Concerns 



