Silver Prices Hit Record High as Safe-Haven Demand Surges Amid U.S. Economic Uncertainty 
Shell M&A Chief Exits After BP Takeover Proposal Rejected 
U.S. Stock Futures Edge Higher as Micron Earnings Boost AI Sentiment Ahead of CPI Data 
Wall Street Futures Slip as Tech Stocks Struggle Ahead of Key US Economic Data 
Bank of Japan Poised for Historic Rate Hike as Inflation Pressures Persist 
RBA Unlikely to Cut Interest Rates in 2026 as Inflation Pressures Persist, Says Westpac 
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Plunge on Earnings Warning Amid U.S. and China Weakness 
Instacart Stock Drops After FTC Probes AI-Based Price Discrimination Claims 
Korea Zinc to Build $7.4 Billion Critical Minerals Refinery in Tennessee With U.S. Government Backing 
South Korea Warns Weak Won Could Push Inflation Higher in 2025 
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand 
LG Energy Solution Shares Slide After Ford Cancels EV Battery Supply Deal 
Dollar Holds Firm Ahead of Global Central Bank Decisions as Yen, Sterling and Euro React 
Asian Currencies Trade Sideways as Dollar Weakens Ahead of Key U.S. Data 
Biren Technology Targets Hong Kong IPO to Raise $300 Million Amid China’s AI Chip Push 
FDA Says No Black Box Warning Planned for COVID-19 Vaccines Despite Safety Debate 
Japan PMI Data Signals Manufacturing Stabilization as Services Continue to Drive Growth 
Jack Daniel’s, a well-known brand of Tennessee whiskey produced by the Jack Daniel Distillery, has gone to the Supreme Court in the United States for its trademark complaints against a dog toy and accessory company.
According to Reuters, the Supreme Court heard arguments for Jack Daniel’s trademark case on Wednesday this week. This is said to be a closely watched duel between the whiskey maker and dog toy firm that makes chew toys that bear a resemblance to the distiller's popular black-label whiskey bottle.
At the hearing, it was said that some of the judges threw in sharp questions about Jack Daniel’s request for them to drop a longstanding legal test that hatches the possibility of an early off-ramp from an expensive legal process when spoof items get trademark infringement ultimatums.
Jack Daniel's is owned by Brown-Forman Corp., and this legal spat sets the brand’s trademark rights against legal protections for creative expression. In this dispute, the cause involves VIP Products LLC’s dog toy featuring Jack Daniel's Old No. 7 Tennessee whiskey bottle. The dog accessory company changed the label to "the Old No. 2, on your Tennessee Carpet,” which apparently a parody of Jack Daniel’s whiskey.
It was mentioned that the Supreme Court is hearing the arguments about whether VIP Products should be protected from any liability for alleged damage that its chew toy may do to Jack Daniel's as there is a possibility for customers to be misled. They argued that shoppers might associate the chew toy with Jack Daniel’s, which may lead to harming its trademark.
In any case, Business Inquirer reported that some business groups expressed support for Jack Daniel’s in this case. They said the clash holds extensive stakes for corporate America’s capacity of protecting its brands and reputations.
“This case is no laughing matter,” Distilled Spirits Council’s chief legal officer, Courtney Armour, said in a statement. “While the case involves dog toys, even allegedly ‘humorous’ knock-offs can confuse consumers as to what messaging and products well-known alcohol beverage brands endorse.”
On the other hand, there are also groups that do not agree with Jack Daniel’s. They said that if the whiskey maker wins, the result may lead to a “catastrophic chilling effect” as the creative expression may also trigger litigation.
Photo by: Alex Perez/Unsplash
