UN General Assembly Demands Russia Return Ukrainian Children Amid Ongoing Conflict 
U.S.–Russia Peace Talks Stall as Kremlin Rejects Key Proposals 
Israel Receives Body of Deceased Hostage as Rafah Crossing Reopening Hinges on Final Returns 
U.S. Repatriation Flight Carrying 266 Venezuelan Migrants Lands in Caracas 
Trump Pardons Former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández in Controversial Move 
Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Enforcing New Conditions on DHS Grants 
Senators Warn Trump Against Unauthorized Venezuela Strike, Vow War Powers Push 
Drones Spotted Near Zelenskiy’s Flight Path in Ireland Trigger Security Alert 
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 
Meta Accused of Halting Internal Research on Mental Health Risks of Facebook and Instagram 
Trump and Lula Discuss Trade, Sanctions, and Security in “Productive” Phone Call 
U.S.-Russia Talks Leave Ukraine Peace Efforts Uncertain 
Chicago Rejects New Federal Violence Prevention Grants After Policy Shift 
U.S. Soybean Shipments to China Gain Momentum as Trade Tensions Ease 
Taiwan Signals Openness to Renew Ties with Honduras as Election Unfolds 
Appeals Court Blocks Expansion of Fast-Track Deportations in the U.S. 
Bristol Myers Faces $6.7 Billion Lawsuit After Judge Allows Key Shareholder Claims to Proceed 
A federal judge has dismissed criminal charges against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after determining that the prosecutor who brought the cases was improperly appointed. According to the court documents referenced in the original report, U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled that Lindsey Halligan’s appointment as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia did not meet legal requirements, rendering the indictments invalid.
Halligan, who assumed the role in September following pressure on her predecessor to pursue charges, was the only prosecutor to secure grand jury indictments against both Comey and James. The judge’s decision to dismiss the cases without prejudice means that while the current charges cannot move forward, federal prosecutors could potentially refile them if a lawfully appointed U.S. attorney chooses to revisit the matter.
The ruling marks a notable setback for efforts to prosecute the two high-profile officials, particularly because the cases drew significant national attention due to the political implications surrounding their indictments. Legal analysts note that dismissals based on procedural issues—such as improper appointments—underscore the importance of adhering to federal guidelines when initiating criminal proceedings, especially in politically charged cases.
Although President Donald Trump installed Halligan after her predecessor resigned, the judge found that the circumstances of her appointment did not satisfy statutory guidelines. As a result, the court determined that any actions taken under her authority, including the prosecution of Comey and James, could not stand.
The dismissal leaves open the possibility of future legal action but places the responsibility on a properly appointed U.S. attorney to decide whether the cases merit further pursuit. For now, the ruling resets the legal landscape surrounding the allegations and highlights the ongoing complexities of federal prosecutorial authority.
